美国STEAM教育的框架、特点及启示

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.04.004

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 40-46+134+135.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.04.004

• 专题:STEAM教育研究 • 上一篇下一篇

美国STEAM教育的框架、特点及启示

魏晓东, 于冰, 于海波

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地东北师范大学中国农村教育发展研究院, 吉林长春 130024

出版日期:2017-08-20 发布日期:2017-07-07
基金资助:
教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目2016年度课题"农村学校办学形态与品质提升"（16JJD880015）。

STEAM Education in America: Framework, Characteristic and Implication

WEI Xiaodong, YU Bing, YU Haibo

Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Universities of Ministry of Education, China Institute of Rural Education Development in Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China

Online:2017-08-20 Published:2017-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来，美国在推进基础教育改革的过程中，不断提高对STEAM教育的重视程度，甚至将其视为一种国家战略。通过STEAM教育，可以培养学生以学科整合的方式认识世界，运用跨学科的思维解决现实问题，提升他们的逻辑思维能力和问题解决能力，使其成为具有STEAM素养的高质量人才。STEAM教育在世界范围内迅速展开，必将推动基础教育的重大变革。梳理STEAM教育的产生背景，分析STEAM教育的框架，总结STEAM教育的特点可以为我国基础教育改革带来有益启示。

关键词: STEAM教育, 项目学习, 基础教育

Abstract: In recent years, to promote basic education reform, the United States has given high priority to its STEAM education, which has become a national strategy. It's widely accepted that STEAM education helps students to understand the world in an integrated way, to use interdisciplinary thinking to solve practical problems, develop their logical thinking and problem solving skills, and cultivate high quality STEAM talents. With the worldwide spread of STEAM education, it will certainly bring about major changes in basic education. This article looks at the background of STEAM education, analyzes its framework and summarize the characteristics of STEAM education, so as to offer some lessons for the reform of basic education in China.

Key words: STEAM Education, project based learning, basic education

魏晓东, 于冰, 于海波. 美国STEAM教育的框架、特点及启示[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(4): 40-46+134+135.

WEI Xiaodong, YU Bing, YU Haibo. STEAM Education in America: Framework, Characteristic and Implication[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2017, 35(4): 40-46+134+135.

参考文献

赵慧臣, 陆晓婷. (2016). 开展STEAM教育,提高学生创新能力——访美国STEAM教育知名学者格雷特·亚克门教授. 开放教育研究, 22(5),5-6.
赵建华, 李克东.(2000). 协作学习及其协作学习模式. 中国电化教育, (10), 5-6.
L.约翰逊, S.亚当斯贝克尔, V.埃斯特拉达, A.弗里曼, 张铁道, & 白晓晶等. (2015). 新媒体联盟地平线报告(2015基础教育版). 北京广播电视大学学报(s1), 1-18.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education?. Science, 329(5995), 996-996.
Chung, C. C. J. (2014). Integrated STEAM education through global robotics art festival (GRAF). In Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 2014 IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Fantauzzacoffin, J., Rogers, J. D., & Bolter, J. D. (2012). From STEAM research to education:An integrated art and engineering course at Georgia Tech. In Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 2012 IEEE 2nd (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. (2015). Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education. Springer.Berlin,Germany:SpringerPress.
Hamner, E., & Cross, J. (2013). Arts & Bots:Techniques for distributing a STEAM robotics program through K-12 classrooms. In Proceedings of the Third IEEE Integrated STEMEducation Conference, Princeton, NJ, USA.
National Science Board.(1986).Undergraduate graduate Science,Mathematics and Engineering Education. Retrieved from:http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/1986/nsb0386.pdf
National Science Board (US).(2007) A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the US science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system.Retrieved from:http://esdstem.pbworks.com/f/National%20STEM%20Action%20Plan.pdf
PLTW Launch Curriculum(2016). Retrieved from:Https://www.pltw.org/our-programs/pltw-launch
Rabalais, M. E. (2014). Steam:a national study of the integration of the arts into stem instruction and its impact on student achievement. Dissertations & Theses-Gradworks,28, 208-212
STEM Education Resource Center.(2016).Retrieved from:http://www.pbs.org/teachers/stem/Sousa, D. A., &Pilecki, T. (2013). From STEM to STEAM:Using brain-compatible strategies to integrate the arts. Corwin Press.
STEAM Education Educators.(2016). Retrieved from:http://steamedu.com/about-us/educators/
STEAM Education FAQ.(2016).Retrieved from:http://steamedu.com/about-us/faqs/
USNews(2014).Retrievedfromhttp://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/02/04/5-more-unive-rsities-will-create-stem-teacher-training-programs
Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the US asa practical educational framework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 1072-1086.
Yakman, G. (2010). What is the point of STE@M?-A Brief Overview. Steam:A Frameworkfor Teaching Across the Disciplines. STEAM Education, 7, 3-7.

[1]	李政涛. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能对基础教育之“基础”的颠覆与重置[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 47-55.
[2]	柏宏权, 王姣阳, 沈书生. 区域教育管理者对在线教学融入常态教学的意愿及其影响因素研究——江苏省中小学在线教学调查研究报告之五[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(4): 77-89.
[3]	时晨晨. 美国基础教育项目效果评估经验何在？——基于25项高质量评估研究的主题文本分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(1): 43-59.
[4]	耿乐乐. 中国基础教育生均经费支出的公平性研究——基于Gini系数和Theil指数的测算[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(1): 60-73.
[5]	李刚, 辛涛. 基础教育质量的内涵与监测评价理论模型[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(4): 15-29.
[6]	张佳慧, 李峰, 辛涛. 基础教育质量指数构建的模式与途径[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(4): 30-41.
[7]	陈慧娟, 辛涛. 我国基础教育质量监测与评价体系的演进与未来走向[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(4): 42-52.
[8]	[德]安德烈亚斯·施莱希尔（Andreas Schleicher）. 教育面向学生的未来，而不是我们的过去[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(5): 1-21.
[9]	魏易. 校内还是校外：中国基础教育阶段家庭教育支出现状研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(5): 103-116.
[10]	项贤明. 七十年来我国两轮“减负”教育改革的历史透视[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(5): 67-79.
[11]	陈纯槿, 顾小清. 义务教育年限延长与基础教育发展——基于PISA 2015数据的实证研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(5): 71-82+167+168.
[12]	胡卫平, 首新, 陈勇刚. 中小学STEAM教育体系的建构与实践[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(4): 31-39+134.
[13]	高云峰, 师保国. 跨学科创新视角下创客教育与STEAM教育的融合[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(4): 47-53+135.
[14]	大卫·安德森, 季娇. 从STEM教育到STEAM教育——大卫·安德森与季娇关于博物馆教育的对话[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(4): 122-129+139.
[15]	文军, 顾楚丹. 基础教育资源分配的城乡差异及其社会后果——基于中国教育统计数据的分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(2): 33-42+117.

美国STEAM教育的框架、特点及启示

STEAM Education in America: Framework, Characteristic and Implication

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价