华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 1-17.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.001

• 特稿 •    下一篇

兴趣的限度:基于杜威困惑的讨论

刘云杉   

  1. 北京大学教育学院, 北京 100871
  • 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-03-21

The Limitation of Interest: Discussion Based on John Dewey's Perplexity

Liu Yunshan   

  1. Graduate School of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-03-21

摘要: 兴趣论题是杜威与实用主义力求在旧教育的刻板教条与新教育的浪漫随意之间持守中道,将客观与主观、实践与思考、潜力与现实两方面融会在一起培养孩子品格的"居间"之道。然而进步主义教育的实践陷入社会改良方法论上的"内在否定主义"。如何将抽象的二元对立的原则变为简易可行的教育,这不仅是杜威的困惑,也是此后教育改革的困惑。本研究将杜威的文本置放在其学术脉络和进步主义教育思想的渊源及其实践的来龙去脉之中,结合社会变革的背景进行仔细的考察辨析,挖掘呈现教育理论与教育实践、社会改良之间错综复杂的关系,讨论思想批判、科学实验、社会改造及其落实于教育之中的可能与限度。

关键词: 兴趣, 杜威, 进步主义教育, 教育与社会

Abstract: The issue of interest is the major concern that Dewey and pragmatism strived to maintain in between of the stereotyped dogmatism and the romance of the new education, which combined objective and subjective, practice and thinking, potential and reality to cultivate children's character. However, the practice of progressivism education fell into the "internal negativism" of social improvement. How can the abstract dualistic principles be transformed into simple and feasible education? This is not only Dewey's perplexity but also the problem with education reform ever since. In this study, the author placed Dewey's text in the academic context, the ideological source of progressive education and the development of practice. Also, in the context of social reforms, the author analyzed the intricate relationship between educational theory and educational practice, social improvement, discussed ideological criticism, scientific experiments, social reformations, and explored the possibility and limitation of its implementation in education.

Key words: interest, John Dewey, progressivism education, education and society