变革型领导力与教师组织承诺的关系研究——教师自我效能感的中介效应分析

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.07.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究校长变革型领导力对教师组织承诺的直接影响，以及教师自我效能感在影响机制中的中介效应，本论文以多省市520名教师为对象，设计了校长变革型领导力、教师自我效能感、教师组织承诺三个量表，运用Amos23.0构建结构方程模型探索变量间作用机制，结合Bootstrap引入教师自我效能感这一中介变量进行验证分析。结果表明：校长变革型领导力、教师自我效能感对教师组织承诺都具有显著的积极影响；变革型领导力对教师自我效能感具有显著的积极影响；教师自我效能感在校长变革型领导力对教师组织承诺的影响关系中起到中介作用，即校长的变革型领导力部分通过教师的自我效能感对教师的组织承诺产生影响。

关键词: 变革型领导力, 组织承诺, 自我效能感, 影响机制, 中介效应

Abstract: In order to study the direct impact of the transformational leadership of the principal on the organizational commitment level of teachers and the mediating effect of teachers’ self-efficacy in the impact mechanism, the transformational leadership and teacher self-efficacy were designed for 520 high school teachers from many provinces and cities. By using AMOS 23.0,we construct a structural equation model to explore the mechanism of interaction between variables, combined with Bootstrap to introduce the teacher self-efficacy as a mediator variable for the empirical analysis. The analysis results show that the principal’s transformational leadership and teacher’s self-efficacy have a significant positive impact on teacher’s organizational commitment; teacher’s self-efficacy plays a partial intermediary role in the relationship between the principal’s transformational leadership and the teacher’s organizational commitment. The principal's transformational leadership influences teachers’ organizational commitment by affecting teachers’ self-efficacy.

Key words: transformational leadership, organizational commitment, self-efficacy, influence mechanism, mediation

刘莉莉, 孔曼. 变革型领导力与教师组织承诺的关系研究——教师自我效能感的中介效应分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(7): 97-105.

Liu Lili, Kong Man. The Relationship Research of Transformational Leadership and School Teachers’ Organizational Commitment:A Mediating Effect of Teachers’ Self-efficacy[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(7): 97-105.

参考文献

陈文晶, 时勘. (2007). 变革型领导和交易型领导的回顾与展望. 管理评论,(09),22-29
库泽斯、波斯纳、戴启思等. (2014). 领导力: 如何在组织中成就卓越(亚洲版)（陈文芳等译）, 北京：电子工业出版社.
李超平, 时勘. (2005). 变革型领导的结构与测量. 心理学报,37(6),803-811
凌文栓, 张治灿, 方俐洛. (2000). 中国职工组织承诺的结构模型研究. 管理科学学报,3(2),76-80
庞丽娟, 洪秀敏. (2005). 教师自我效能感: 教师自主发展的重要内在动力机制. 教师教育研究,(04),43-46
时晨晨. (2019). 校长该如何进行教学领导?. 人民教育,(8),8
宋爱红, 蔡永红. (2005). 教师组织承诺结构的验证性因素分析. 心理发展与教育,21(2),48-51
托马斯·J.萨乔万尼. (2002). 道德领导抵及学校改善的核心（冯大鸣译）. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
吴量, 詹浩洋. (2017). 中文版教师自我效能感量表(TSE)(简版)的信度和效度研究. 心理技术与应用,5(11),672-679
辛涛, 申继亮, 林崇德. (1994). 教师自我效能感与学校因素关系的研究. 教育研究,(10),16-20
Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5, 1-43
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1996). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, , 121-126
Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of transformational leadership redux. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 463-478
Burns J M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
Guskey, T. R. (1987). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. The Journal of educational research, 81(1), 41-47
Jing, L., & Zhang, D. (2014). The mediation of performance in the relationship of organizational commitment to university faculty’s effectiveness. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(1), 141-153
Leithwood, K. A. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8-12
Leithwood, K., Begley, P. T., & Cousins, J. B. (1994). Developing Expert Leadership for Future Schools, (11): 331.
Leithwood, K., & Others, A. (1993). Secondary school teachers’ commitment to change: the contributions of transformational leadership., 62(62), 66-74.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89
Mohammed S. I., Simin G. S., Saedah Siraj M. K. (2014). Can transformational leadership influence on teachers’commitment towards organization, teaching profession, and students learning? A quantitative analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(2), 177-190
Newmann, F. M., Rutter, R. A., & Smith, M. S. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations. Sociology of education, , 221-238
Silins H, Mulford B. (2002). Leadership and School Results: Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Berlin: Springer Netherlands, (02), 561-612
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805

[1]	宁德鹏, 何彤彤, 邓君雪, 曾雪. 创新创业教育对创业行为的影响机理研究——以创业能力和创业意愿为中介的大样本实证考察[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(2): 93-105.
[2]	李一杉, 刘金松. 举贤不避亲：内部人特征降低了学术论文的质量和影响力吗？——以中国大陆教育学术期刊发表的923901篇论文为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(10): 77-102.
[3]	薛海平, 赵阳. 高中生参加课外补习有助于考大学吗？[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(5): 93-102.
[4]	黄雨恒, 史静寰. 教育、出身与政策:少数民族大学生入学机会的分配机制研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(4): 62-70+163+164.
[5]	陈秋珠. 初中生学业拖延与学业自我效能感关系研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2016, 34(3): 100-106.
[6]	黄攸立,饶繁繁,周宏. 国外领导自我效能感研究现状与展望[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(1): 62-70.
[7]	王强. 民办民工子女学校教师自我效能感实证分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2012, 30(2): 42-47.
[8]	吴湘萍, 徐福缘, 周勇. 高校教师工作绩效的影响因素分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2006, 24(1): 30-37.