华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 84-93.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.04.008

• 基本理论与基本问题 • 上一篇    下一篇

“更高水平的人才培养体系”需要怎样的质量评价观?——基于排行性评价视角的哲学省思

张学文   

  1. 新华文摘杂志社, 北京 100706
  • 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-07-22

Quality Evaluation Needed for “The Higher-level Talent-cultivating System”: A Philosophical Reflection Based on Ranking Evaluation

Zhang Xuewen   

  1. Xinhua Wenzhai Periodical Office, Beijing 100706, China
  • Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-07-22

摘要: 最近十年,有关高等教育质量的各种排行性评价层出不穷,引发了诸多争议。排行榜作为全球高等教育质量评价一个重要的热门指标,既有其便捷合理的一面,存在的问题同样显而易见。在哲学方法论上,有关高等教育质量评价的种种论争深受具有自然主义倾向的实证主义与具有人文主义倾向的反实证思潮的影响。20世纪中期西方世界著名的"两种文化"的交锋就基本反映出这两种学术文化的强烈互动。要正确认识并引导好高等教育评价的导向问题,最终还需要深入了解高等教育的基本功能与核心理念,研究和理解现代大学有关知识的创新、传播与转移之间的本质关系,掌握现代研究型大学中"科研-教学-学习连接体"双螺旋群体的作用机制,并借此契机探索构建合乎中国国情学情的科学的高等教育质量评价和更高水平的人才培养体系。

关键词: 高等教育质量评价, 科研-教学-学习连接体, 双螺旋群体, 人才培养体系

Abstract: In the last decade, various ranking evaluation of higher education quality has emerged, causing a lot of controversy. In philosophy methodology, the controversy over the evaluation of higher education quality is influenced by the naturalistic positivism and the humanistic anti-positivism. The confrontation of the popular "two cultures" in the west in the middle of the 20th century basically reflects the interaction between the two academic cultures. In order to understand and guide the evaluation of higher education correctly, it's essential to understand the basic functions and core concepts of higher education, and study the relationship between knowledge innovation, dissemination and transfer in modern universities. In addition, it's important to master the mechanism of "the research-teaching-study nexus" as a double helix group in modern research universities, and seek to build a higher-level talent-cultivating system, together with a scientific evaluation of higher education quality with Chinese characteristics.

Key words: evaluation of the higher education quality, the research-teaching-study nexus, double helix group, talent-cultivating system