华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 78-89.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.02.007

• 基本理论与基本问题 • 上一篇    下一篇

交叉学科导向的现代家庭教育知识生产

吴重涵1, 朱重旺1, 王茜2   

  1. 1. 江西师范大学教育学院,南昌 330000
    2. 广州大学教育学院,广州 510000
  • 出版日期:2025-02-01 发布日期:2025-01-18

Interdisciplinarity Approach to Knowledge Production for Modern Family Education

Chonghan Wu1, Chongwang Zhu1, Xi Wang2   

  1. 1. School of Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330000, China
    2. School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • Online:2025-02-01 Published:2025-01-18

摘要:

家庭教育学历史上以学校教育学为理论原型,(发展)心理学占据统治地位,事实上成为较为微观和狭义的“父母教养学”,这与现代家庭教育的真实图景并不相符。采用“儿童在家庭是如何改变的”问题域的视角,我们看到家庭教育正在形成多学科交叉并可能形成交叉学科的景观,改变着家庭教育学科的走向、重心,形成了开放的家庭教育研究版图。家庭教育主要是“事物的教育”,是家庭生活中儿童的体验性改变,父母的教养作为“人的教育”包含其中;家庭教育是社会机制和心理机制的统一,其中社会机制更具有决定性意义。研究家庭中儿童改变的社会机制的社会科学,正在形成以社会学视角为核心,经济学、家庭史和儿童史等为重要视角的新的社会学科交叉群落;研究心理机制则以发展心理学和社会学习理论为核心,脑科学和生理学等为重要视角形成另一个学科交叉领域。两者构成解释性家庭教育知识体系的“双核心”学科交叉态势,并可以按照新的知识生产模式形成“现代家庭教育学”交叉学科。在此基础上,本文讨论并指出了社会学以学科分支和整体理论结构的形式“存在”于家庭教育问题域研究中,为交叉学科导向的“双核心”现代家庭教育知识生产模式提供重要支撑。

关键词: 家庭教育, 交叉学科, 社会学, 知识生产

Abstract:

Historically, family education has been based on school pedagogy as a theoretical prototype, in which (developmental) psychology has dominated. Family education has in fact become “parenting” in a micro and narrow sense, which does not correspond to the real image of modern family education. Through the lens of the “how children change in the family” problem domain, we see that family education is forming an interdisciplinary and potentially cross-disciplinary landscape, changing the direction and center of gravity of the discipline of family education and creating an open landscape for family education research. Family education is the “education of things”, the experiential change of children in family life, and the unification of social and psychological mechanisms, of which the social mechanism is the most crucial. A new interdisciplinary cluster of social disciplines is being formed through the study of how children in the family change social mechanisms, with a sociological perspective at its core and important perspectives from economics, family history, and children’s history, etc.; relevant studies of psychological mechanisms form another interdisciplinary area, with developmental psychology at its core, and important perspectives from brain science and physiology. Both constitute a “dual-core” cross-disciplinary situation that explains the body of knowledge on family education and can form a cross-discipline of “modern family education” according to a new model of knowledge production. On this basis, we discuss and demonstrate that sociology exists in the domain of family education through its various branches and general theoretical framework. This effectively supports the ‘dual-core’ interdisciplinarity approach to family education knowledge production.

Key words: family education, interdisciplinary, sociology, knowledge production