网络出版日期: 2022-12-29
基金资助
国家社会科学基金“十四五”规划教育学重点课题“我国义务教育学业负担综合治理研究”(AHA210009);深圳市教育科学 “十四五”规划重点资助课题“青少年社会情绪能力发展现状与多维提升机制研究”(ZDZZ21001)
The Types of Parental Involvement and Secondary School Students’ Subject Literacy: A Latent Class Analysis Based on the Data of Hong Kong and Macao in PISA 2018
Online published: 2022-12-29
分析家长教育卷入的类型特征及其与中学生学科素养之间的关系具有重要意义。基于PISA 2018中国香港和澳门的数据,本研究采用潜在类别分析(LCA)识别出家长教育卷入类型的四个潜在类别,并探讨人口学变量对潜在类别的影响、潜在类别与中学生学科素养(数学、阅读、科学和跨文化素养)的关系。结果表明,地区、学生性别、年级、家庭经济社会文化地位和家长对孩子的学业期望对潜在类别有不同程度的显著影响;不同潜在类别的中学生学科素养表现存在显著差异。家长低度卷入组(C1, 39.1%)的数学、阅读、科学素养优于其他组别,但跨文化素养表现一般。家长繁忙高度卷入组(C2, 33.3%)的阅读素养略优于家长广泛高度卷入组(C3, 23.1%),但其他三方面的素养均弱于家长广泛高度卷入组。家长限制中度卷入组(C4, 4.5%)的数学、阅读、科学素养弱于其他组别,但跨文化素养表现较好。这些发现为我们理解家长教育卷入的作用及改善中学生学科素养提供了启示。
黄声华 , 尹弘飚 , 靳玉乐 . 家长教育卷入类型与中学生学科素养:基于PISA 2018中国香港及澳门数据的潜在类别分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023 , 41(1) : 50 -59 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.01.005
It is both theoretically and practically important to investigate the types and features of parental involvement and their relationships with secondary school students’ subject literacy. Using the data of Hong Kong and Macao in PISA 2018, this study conducted a latent class analysis (LCA) to identify four different latent classes of parental involvement. We then used the robust three step method (R3STEP)and BCH respectively to test how covariates such as region, student gender, and grade contributed to the classification of parental involvement and how different classes of parental involvement were related to students’ mathematics literacy, reading literacy, science literacy, and global competence. The results showed that (a) region, student gender, grade, family ESCS, and parents’ expectation of their child’s educational level were significantly related to, while the gender of parents/guardians who filled the questionnaire was not significantly related to the classification of parental involvement; (b) students of different parental involvement classes were in general found to be significantly different from each other in terms of their subject literacy. Specifically, students of Class 1 (Low Involvement Class, C1, 39.1%) were found to have the highest average scores in mathematics literacy, reading literacy, and science literacy, but not in global competence. Students of Class 2 (Busy and High Involvement Class, C2, 33.3%) were found to have slightly higher average scores in reading literacy than those of class 3 (Comprehensive and High Involvement Class, C3, 23.1%), but have lower performance in mathematics literacy, science literacy, and global competence than those of Class 3. Students of Class 4 (Limited and Moderate Involvement Class, C4, 4.5%) were found to have the lowest average scores in mathematics literacy, reading literacy, and science literacy, but have better performance in global competence.
Key words: parental involvement; latent class analysis; PISA; subject literacy
null | 李佳哲, 胡咏梅. (2021). 家长学习参与和中小学生学业成绩的关系研究——基于亲子关系和学习自信心的有中介的调节模型分析. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (7), 72- 83. |
null | 梁文艳, 孙冉, 叶晓梅. (2018). 核心素养视角下家长参与如何影响儿童的学业发展? ——基于城乡户籍和区域流动状况的差异分析. 教育经济评论, (3), 40- 60. |
null | 刘保中, 张月云, 李建新. (2015). 家庭社会经济地位与青少年教育期望: 父母参与的中介作用. 北京大学教育评论, (3), 158- 176+192. |
null | 罗良, 吴艺方, 韦唯. (2014). 高质量父母教育卷入的特征. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 53- 60. |
null | 王孟成, 毕向阳. (2018). 回归混合模型: 方法进展与软件实现. 心理科学进展, (12), 2272- 2280. |
null | 温忠麟, 谢晋艳, 王惠惠. (2023). 潜在类别模型的原理、步骤及程序. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 41 (1), 1-15. |
null | 夏媛. (2020). 家庭社会经济地位、父母教育期望、父母教育卷入对初中生数学学习投入影响的研究. 西南大学硕士学位论文. |
null | Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B.. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes, 21 (2), 1- 22. |
null | Bauer, D. J., & Shanahan, M. J. (2007). Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, N. A. Card (Eds. ), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 255−283). Routledge. |
null | Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H. J., Ritzen, H., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10- 30. |
null | Borgonovi, F., & Montt, G. (2012). Parental involvement in selected PISA countries and economies. OECD Education Working Papers (No. 73). OECD Publishing. |
null | Fan, X. , & Chen, M.. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (1), 1- 22. |
null | Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Holbein, M. F. D. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17 (2), 99- 123. |
null | Jeynes, W. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35 (2), 202- 218. |
null | Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2017). Mplus users’ guide (Version 8). Muthén & Muthén. |
null | Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte-Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14 (4), 535- 569. |
null | OECD (2017). PISA 2015 technical report. OECD Publishing. |
null | Pilgrim, C. C., Schulenberg, J. E., O’malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (2006). Mediators and moderators of parental involvement on substance use: A national study of adolescents. Prevention Science, 7 (1), 75- 89. |
null | Takashiro, N.. (2017). A multilevel analysis of Japanese middle school student and school socioeconomic status influence on mathematics achievement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29 (3), 247- 267. |
null | Wang, Y., Deng, C., & Yang, X. (2016). Family economic status and parental involvement: Influences of parental expectation and perceived barriers. School Psychology International, 37 (5), 536- 553. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |