教师队伍建设

效率还是价值:高校教师评价制度的逻辑困境及其张力调适

  • 苏强 ,
  • 蔡晓卫
展开
  • 1. 杭州电子科技大学 浙江高等教育研究院,杭州 310018
    2. 浙江大学 马克思主义学院,浙江大学马克思主义理论创新与传播研究中心 ,杭州 310058

网络出版日期: 2023-05-30

基金资助

2019年国家社科基金专项“习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想进教材进课堂进头脑传播效果研究”(19VSZ010)

Efficiency or Value: Logic Dilemmas and Tension Adjustments of University Faculty Evaluation System

  • Qiang Su ,
  • Xiaowei Cai
Expand
  • 1. Zhejiang Institute of Higher Education, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    2. School of Marxism Zhejiang University, Research Center for Marxism Theory Innovation and Communication of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Online published: 2023-05-30

摘要

近些年来盛行的国内高校教师评价活动,科研导向、定量方式、绩效至上始终占据着主导地位,反映出只重事实层面的合理性而轻价值层面正当性的现象。高校教师评价取向与标准主要非来自理论逻辑的自洽,而是现实中外部力量对高校学术生态的强力介入及其与高校博弈的结果,进而形塑了教师的工作生活方式以及学术信念与行动偏好。因此,从价值层面对时下评价制度的结果逻辑、计数逻辑与绩效逻辑予以全面检思,继而调适教师评价目的性与工具性价值间的张力尤为必要。

本文引用格式

苏强 , 蔡晓卫 . 效率还是价值:高校教师评价制度的逻辑困境及其张力调适[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023 , 41(6) : 133 -141 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.06.011

Abstract

In recent years, the prevalent evaluation activities in university faculties have always been dominated by scientific research orientation, quantitative method, and performance orientation, reflecting the phenomenon that only emphasizes the rationalities at the factual level and ignores the legitimacy at the value level. The evaluation orientation and standards of university faculties are not mainly derived from the self-consistent theoretical logic, but from the strong interventions of external forces in the academic ecology of universities and the results of competitions among universities in reality, which in turn shapes faculties work life styles, academic beliefs, and action preferences. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively reflect on the result logic, counting logic, and performance logic of the current evaluation system at the value level, so as to adjust the tension between the purpose value and instrumental value of faculty evaluation.

参考文献

null 操太圣 “五唯”问题: 高校教师评价的后果、根源及解困路向 大学教育科学 2019 1 27 32 操太圣. (2019). “五唯”问题: 高校教师评价的后果、根源及解困路向. 大学教育科学,(1),27—32.
null 董彦邦, 刘莉 高校医学院本部教师最认同什么样的科研评价制度?——基于对我国18所高校医学院本部教师的调查 复旦教育论坛 2021 19 5 105 112 董彦邦, 刘莉. (2021). 高校医学院本部教师最认同什么样的科研评价制度?—基于对我国18所高校医学院本部教师的调查. 复旦教育论坛,19(5),105—112.
null 赖鼎铭 量化指标并非学术评鉴的万灵丹: 以国外几种代表性的学术评鉴为例 图书馆学与资讯科学 2005 31 1 14 33 赖鼎铭. (2005). 量化指标并非学术评鉴的万灵丹: 以国外几种代表性的学术评鉴为例. 图书馆学与资讯科学,31(1),14—33.
null 李文平 大学教师对教师评价制度的满意度调查分析 高校教育管理 2017 3 95 104 李文平. (2017). 大学教师对教师评价制度的满意度调查分析. 高校教育管理,(3),95—104.
null 刘莉, 朱莉, 刘念才 目标群体视角下高校教师科研评价政策认同研究——基于20所“双一流”建设高校的问卷调查 清华大学教育研究 2020 41 4 73 82 刘莉, 朱莉, 刘念才. (2020). 目标群体视角下高校教师科研评价政策认同研究—基于20所“双一流”建设高校的问卷调查. 清华大学教育研究,41(4),73—82.
null 秦琳. (2019-10-24). 如何破解高校“唯论文”顽疾. 光明日报, (14).
null 苏锦丽, 黄曙东 美国大学教师评鉴制度之探讨 教育政策论坛 2009 2 1 44 苏锦丽, 黄曙东. (2009). 美国大学教师评鉴制度之探讨. 教育政策论坛,(2),1—44.
null 习近平. (2020). 习近平谈治国理政. 北京: 外文出版社.
null 阎光才, 岳英 高校学术评价过程中的认可机制及其合理性——以经济学领域为个案的实证研究 教育研究 2012 10 75 83 阎光才, 岳英. (2012). 高校学术评价过程中的认可机制及其合理性—以经济学领域为个案的实证研究. 教育研究,(10),75—83.
null 阎光才 高水平大学教师本科教学投入及其影响因素分析 中国高教研究 2018 11 22 27 阎光才. (2018). 高水平大学教师本科教学投入及其影响因素分析. 中国高教研究,(11),22—27.
null Amaranti, M Uso de Resultados de la Evaluación Docente para Mejorar la Calidad de la Docencia Universitaria Congreso Universidad 2017 6 1 91 114 Amaranti, M. (2017). Uso de Resultados de la Evaluación Docente para Mejorar la Calidad de la Docencia Universitaria. Congreso Universidad, 6(1), 91—114.
null Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
null Erickson, M., Hanna, P., & Walker, C The UK Higher Education Senior Management Survey: A Statactivist Response to Managerialist Governance Studies in Higher Education 2021 46 11 2134 2151 Erickson, M., Hanna, P., & Walker, C. (2021). The UK Higher Education Senior Management Survey: A Statactivist Response to Managerialist Governance. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2134—2151.
null Hill, H. C Fixing Teacher Professional Development Phi Delta Kappan 2009 90 7 470 477 Hill, H. C. (2009). Fixing Teacher Professional Development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 470—477.
null Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E Portfolios for Learning, Assessment and Professional Development in Higher Education Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2006 31 3 267 286 Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for Learning, Assessment and Professional Development in Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 267—286.
null Laudel, G., & Glaser, J Tensions Between Evaluations and Communications Practices Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 2006 28 3 289 295 Laudel, G., & Glaser, J. (2006). Tensions Between Evaluations and Communications Practices. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3), 289—295.
null Lu, H., & Zhang, X. R. (2021). Emotional Responses Toward a New Research Policy Among Academics in a Chinese University. Front Psychol, 12(11).
null Meng, Q., & Wang, G A Research on Sources of University Faculty Occupational Stress: A Chinese Case Study Psychology Research and Behaviour Management Journal 2018 11 597 605 Meng, Q., & Wang, G. (2018). A Research on Sources of University Faculty Occupational Stress: A Chinese Case Study. Psychology Research and Behaviour Management Journal, 11, 597—605.
null Prodegers, S. B Toward Systematic Faculty Evaluation Regional Spotlight 1980 13 2 1 19 Prodegers, S. B. (1980). Toward Systematic Faculty Evaluation. Regional Spotlight, 13(2), 1—19.
null Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L The Effect of Different Teaching, Research, and Service Emphases on Individual and Organizational Outcomes in Higher Education Institutions Journal of Education for Business 2009 84 3 169 176 Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L. (2009). The Effect of Different Teaching, Research, and Service Emphases on Individual and Organizational Outcomes in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(3), 169—176.
文章导航

/