国际对话

交叉学科研究的机遇与陷阱——张丹与苏珊•罗伯森的对话

  • 张丹 ,
  • [英]苏珊?罗伯森
展开
  • 1. 华东师范大学国际与比较教育研究所,上海 200062
    2. 剑桥大学教育学院,英格兰剑桥 CB28PQ

网络出版日期: 2024-06-06

基金资助

国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2019年度教育学一般课题“法国创建世界一流大学的国际化战略研究:以法国高师集团为例”(BDA190070)。

The Possibilities and Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Research

  • Dan Zhang ,
  • Susan Robertson
Expand
  • 1. Institute of International and Comparative Education, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    2. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB28PQ, England

Online published: 2024-06-06

摘要

新时期国家大力提倡学科交叉,加快“双一流”建设目标,着重打破传统学科间壁垒,探索跨院系、跨学科、跨专业交叉培养拔尖创新人才,加快学科协同交叉融合,这对提出并解决交叉学科难题具有重要意义。然而,真正的多学科、交叉学科及跨学科方法并不可能通过制度性的强制要求而孵化产生,且在现有实践中很难实现真正的交叉学科。那么,交叉学科研究是否必要?如何促进交叉学科发展,存在哪些机遇与挑战,在学科交叉发展中又存在哪些制度性发展陷阱?针对以上问题,华东师范大学国际与比较教育研究所张丹副教授与剑桥大学教育学院苏珊?罗伯森教授,以对话的方式共同探讨交叉学科研究发展的机遇与陷阱。

本文引用格式

张丹 , [英]苏珊?罗伯森 . 交叉学科研究的机遇与陷阱——张丹与苏珊•罗伯森的对话[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024 , 42(7) : 114 -126 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.07.010

Abstract

In the new era, China is vigorously advocating for interdisciplinary research, expediting the goal of establishing world-class universities with a specific focus on dismantling traditional disciplinary barriers. The emphasis is on exploring the cultivation of exceptional, innovative talents through cross-departmental, interdisciplinary, and cross-professional approaches, expediting the integration of disciplines and proposing solutions to interdisciplinary scientific challenges, which holds significant importance. However, genuine multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary methods cannot be engendered through institutional coercion, and achieving authentic interdisciplinary studies proves challenging in current practices. Consequently, questions arise: Is interdisciplinary research imperative? How can the development of interdisciplinary studies be advanced? What opportunities and challenges exist? And what institutional pitfalls hinder interdisciplinary development? Addressing these queries, Professor Zhang Dan from East China Normal University's Institute of International and Comparative Education and Professor Susan Robertson from the Department of Education at the University of Cambridge engage in a dialogue to collectively explore the opportunities and pitfalls in the development of interdisciplinary research.

参考文献

null 龚怡祖. 学科的内在建构路径与知识运行机制 教育研究 2013 34 9 12 24 龚怡祖. (2013). 学科的内在建构路径与知识运行机制. 教育研究,34(9),12—24.
null 张丹, 姚婷洁.. 法国交叉学科研究机构评估的制度变迁与指标体系 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 2023 31 5 100 118 张丹, 姚婷洁. (2023). 法国交叉学科研究机构评估的制度变迁与指标体系. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),31(5),100—118.
null Boix Mansilla, V., Lamont, M., & Sato, K. (2016). Shared Cognitive–Emotional–Interactional Platforms: Markers and Conditions for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaborations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(4), 571—612.
null Guntau, M., and H. Laitoko. (1991). On the Origins and Nature of Scientific Disciplines. In World Views and Scientific Discipline Formation: Science Studies in the German Democratic Republic, edited by W. R. Woodward, and R. S. Cohen, 17—28. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
null Gibbons, Michael; Nowotny, Helga; Schwartzman, Simon; Scott, Peter; Trow, Martin A. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE Publications.
null Klein, J T (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne state university press.
null K?nig, B., K. Diehl, K. Tscherning, and K. Helming. (2013). “A Framework for Structuring Interdisciplinary Research Management. ” Research Policy. 42 (1), 261—272.
null Leydesdorff, Loet (2012). “The Knowledge-Based Economy and the Triple Helix Model”. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Communications Research. arXiv: 1—54.
null Pfrman, S., & Martin, P. (2017). Facilitating interdisciplinary scholars. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, R. dos Santos Pacheco (Eds. ), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed. ) (pp. 586—600). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
null Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the 21st Century, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
null Robertson, S. L. (2009) ‘Producing’ the Global Knowledge Economy: the World Bank, the KAM, Education and Development, in M. Simons, M. Olssen and M. Peters (eds) Re-reading Education Policies: Studying the Policy Agenda of the 21st Century, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
null Silliman, R. H. “Fresnel and the Emergence of Physics as a Discipline” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 1974 4 137 162. Silliman, R. H. (1974). “Fresnel and the Emergence of Physics as a Discipline”. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, ,4, ,137—162.
null Tomas Hellstro?m, Erik Brattstro?m and Leila Jabrane. (2018). Governing interdisciplinary cooperation in Centers of Excellence. Studies in Higher Education. 43(10), 1763—1777.
null Thomas Piketty. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century: a multidimensional approach to the history of capital and social classes. The British Journal of Sociology. 65(4), 736—747.
null Wallerstein, I. (1991). Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-century Paradigms, Cambridge: Polity Press.
null Whitley, R. (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
文章导航

/