科学教育

科学教育中科学家的角色与功能

  • 朱晶 ,
  • 姜雪峰
展开
  • 1. 华东师范大学海南研究院,海南三亚 572025
    2. 华东师范大学哲学系,上海 200241
    3. 华东师范大学化学与分子工程学院,上海 200062

录用日期: 2024-04-15

  网络出版日期: 2024-07-23

基金资助

国家杰出青年科学基金项目(22125103),中央高校基本科研业务费项目华东师范大学人文社会科学青年跨学科学术创新团队项目(2022QKT003)。

The Roles and Functions of Scientists Engaging in Science Education

  • Jing Zhu ,
  • Xuefeng Jiang
Expand
  • 1. Hainan Institute of East China Normal University, Sanya 572025, China
    2. Department of Philosophy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
    3. School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Accepted date: 2024-04-15

  Online published: 2024-07-23

摘要

部分科学家参与科学教育的专业实践以及与此相关的研究,是发展高质量科学教育的关键要素。科学家为何以及应该如何深度参与到其他专业群体之中,即科学教育中科学家的角色定位和功能发挥问题,尚缺乏适当的分析框架。互动型专长这一概念框架,强调科学研究中的默会规范,以及外行沉浸于科学研究活动与科学群体之中的重要性,适用于分析当前科学教育如何实现实践转向。当下的科学实践存在着社会?认知上的层级迁移、更强的默会程度和交叉性等特征,科学发展的动态性和科学探索的复杂性给科学教育变革带来了新挑战。科学教育在将科学认知实践的真实过程、与认知实践相关的社会维度等转化为教育资源时,衔接不足。通过参与校内外科学教育,科学家能够促进科学外行的互动型专长,自身也能获得一定的社会?认知受益。科学家深度参与科学教育有多重角色,是促进学生参与和理解真实的科学认知实践的衔接者和资源提供者、科学教育领域的合作研究者。通过传递真实的科学研究过程、澄清学科交叉中的多重概念与推理、促进理解科学模型、促进有科学证据的科学教育研究,科学家能够发挥的功能可以是:提升课程质量、影响教学实践、提升基础教育科学教师的培养层次,助力学生成为认知实践的主体,培养科技人才、促进有科学证据的科学教育。

本文引用格式

朱晶 , 姜雪峰 . 科学教育中科学家的角色与功能[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024 , 42(8) : 50 -63 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.08.005

Abstract

It is an increasing discourse that scientists should engage in professional science education addressing the general public both in formal and informal education settings. However, we lack well-developed frameworks to analyze how (some) scientists engage in science education and what roles their engagement plays in scientific and other communities. Based on the framework of acquiring interactional expertise, this paper analyses the varied expertise levels, tacit norms and interdisciplinarity for doing and understanding contemporary science challenges in science education. It is difficult for science teachers to represent the real epistemic practice of the whole scientific process in science education settings and learning environments, and then to promote the learners to reflectively participate in epistemic practice. Building on the work of interactional expertise, this paper discusses why some scientists should engage in the practice and research on science education, how they engage, and the socio-epistemic benefits for engagement. It then concludes scientists’ roles and functions in science education.

参考文献

null 裴新宁, 郑太年. 国际科学教育发展的对比研究——理念、主题与实践的革新 中国科学院院刊 2021 36 7 771 778 裴新宁, 郑太年. (2021). 国际科学教育发展的对比研究——理念、主题与实践的革新. 中国科学院院刊,36(7),771—778.
null 孙慧芳, 王钦忠, 黄瑄, 周玉芝. 小学科学教师队伍专业发展现状及提升策略——基于对北京市2222名小学科学教师的调研分析 中小学管理 2023 06 34 37 孙慧芳, 王钦忠, 黄瑄, 周玉芝. (2023). 小学科学教师队伍专业发展现状及提升策略——基于对北京市2222名小学科学教师的调研分析. 中小学管理,06,34—37.
null 杨玉良. 构建中国特色世界水平的科学教育体系 中国教育学刊 2022 10 卷首语 杨玉良. (2022). 构建中国特色世界水平的科学教育体系. 中国教育学刊, 10, 卷首语.
null 郁振华. 论三种智慧 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 2020 52 05 53 67 郁振华. (2020). 论三种智慧. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 52(05), 53—67.
null 袁振国. 教育数字化转型: 转什么, 怎么转 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2023 41 03 1 11 袁振国. (2023). 教育数字化转型: 转什么, 怎么转. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 41(03), 1—11.
null 郑永和, 杨宣洋, 袁正, 卢阳旭. 高质量科学教育体系: 内涵和框架 中国教育学刊 2022 10 12 18 郑永和, 杨宣洋, 袁正, 卢阳旭. (2022). 高质量科学教育体系: 内涵和框架. 中国教育学刊,10,12—18.
null 郑永和, 杨宣洋, 王晶莹, 李佳, 卢阳旭, 李书惠, 杨玉静, 张晓琳. 我国小学科学教师队伍现状、影响与建议: 基于31个省份的大规模调研 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2023 41 04 1 21 郑永和, 杨宣洋, 王晶莹, 李佳, 卢阳旭, 李书惠, 杨玉静, 张晓琳. (2023). 我国小学科学教师队伍现状、影响与建议: 基于31个省份的大规模调研. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),41(04),1—21.
null 朱晶, 姜雪峰. 跨越认知价值鸿沟——交叉科学何以深度交叉 探索与争鸣 2023a 02 45 54 朱晶, 姜雪峰. (2023a). 跨越认知价值鸿沟——交叉科学何以深度交叉. 探索与争鸣,02,45—54.
null 朱晶, 姜雪峰. 合成化学中的逻辑推演理论: 科里的逆向思维与计算机辅助 化学教育 2023b 44 14 1 6 朱晶, 姜雪峰. (2023b). 合成化学中的逻辑推演理论: 科里的逆向思维与计算机辅助. 化学教育,44(14),1—6.
null Alberts, B. (2022). Why science education is more important than most scientists think. FEBS Letters. 596(2), 149—159.
null Atias, O., Kali, Y., Shavit, A., & Baram-Tsabari, A. Meaningful participation of schools in scientific research through contributory citizen science projects Science Education 2023 107 5 1163 1192 Atias, O., Kali, Y., Shavit, A., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2023). Meaningful participation of schools in scientific research through contributory citizen science projects. Science Education, 107(5), 1163—1192.
null Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2016 53 7 1082 1112 Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082—1112.
null Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. Evolving roles of scientists as change agents in science education over a decade: SFES roles beyond discipline-based education research Science Advances 2019 5 eaav6403 Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2019). Evolving roles of scientists as change agents in science education over a decade: SFES roles beyond discipline-based education research. Science Advances, 5, eaav6403.
null Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. Disciplinary bias, money matters, and persistence: Deans’ perspectives on science faculty with education specialties (SFES) CBE-Life Science Education 2020 19 3 1 13 Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2020). Disciplinary bias, money matters, and persistence: Deans’ perspectives on science faculty with education specialties (SFES). CBE-Life Science Education, 19(3), 1—13.
null Chandrasekharan, S., & Nersessian, N. J. Building cognition: The construction of computational representations for scientific discovery Cognitive Science 2014 39 8 1727 1763 Chandrasekharan, S., & Nersessian, N. J. (2014). Building cognition: The construction of computational representations for scientific discovery. Cognitive Science, 39(8), 1727—1763.
null Collins, H. , & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
null Collins, H., & Evans, R. Expertise revisited, part I—Interactional expertise Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2015 54 113 123 Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2015). Expertise revisited, part I—Interactional expertise. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 54, 113—123.
null Dance, A. A passion for pedagogy Nature 2023 613 7942 203 205 Dance, A. (2023). A passion for pedagogy. Nature, 613(7942), 203—205.
null de Regt, H. W. (2017). Understanding Scientific Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 27.
null Denning, P. J. , & Tedre, M. (2019). Computational Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
null Donovan, M. S. Generating improvement through research and development in education systems Science 2013 340 6130 317 319 Donovan, M. S. (2013). Generating improvement through research and development in education systems. Science, 340(6130), 317—319.
null Eidin, E, Bielik, T, Touitou, I, Bowers, J, McIntyre, C, Damelin, D, & Krajcik, J. Thinking in terms of change over time: Opportunities and challenges of using system dynamics models Journal of Science Education and Technology 2024 33 1 1 28 Eidin, E, Bielik, T, Touitou, I, Bowers, J, McIntyre, C, Damelin, D, & Krajcik, J. (2024). Thinking in terms of change over time: Opportunities and challenges of using system dynamics models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(1), 1—28.
null Ferreira, L. M, Weiss, J. P., & Lambach, M. Disparities and conceptual connections regarding the concept of substance in general chemistry textbook glossaries Foundations of Chemistry 2022 24 2 171 187 Ferreira, L. M, Weiss, J. P., & Lambach, M. (2022). Disparities and conceptual connections regarding the concept of substance in general chemistry textbook glossaries. Foundations of Chemistry, 24(2), 171—187.
null llchin, D., & Zemplen, G. A. Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and whole science Science Education 2020 104 5 907 933 llchin, D., & Zemplen, G. A. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and whole science. Science Education, 104(5), 907—933.
null Jacobson, W., & Cole, R. Motivations and obstacles influencing faculty engagement in adopting teaching innovations To Improve the Academy:A Journal of Educational Development 2020 39 1 137 159 Jacobson, W., & Cole, R. (2020). Motivations and obstacles influencing faculty engagement in adopting teaching innovations. To Improve the Academy:A Journal of Educational Development, 39(1), 137—159.
null Lau, M., & Sikorski, T-R. Dimensions of Science promoted in museum experiences for teachers Journal of Science Teacher Education 2018 29 7 578 599 Lau, M., & Sikorski, T-R. (2018). Dimensions of Science promoted in museum experiences for teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(7), 578—599.
null Lieber, L. S., Ilbraj, K., Caspari-Gnann, I., & Graulich, N. Closing the gap of organic chemistry students’ performance with an adaptive scaffold for argumentation patterns Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2022 23 811 828 Lieber, L. S., Ilbraj, K., Caspari-Gnann, I., & Graulich, N. (2022). Closing the gap of organic chemistry students’ performance with an adaptive scaffold for argumentation patterns. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23, 811—828.
null Love, A. C. Interdisciplinary lessons for the teaching of biology from the practice of evo-devo Science & Education 2013 22 2 255 278 Love, A. C. (2013). Interdisciplinary lessons for the teaching of biology from the practice of evo-devo. Science & Education, 22(2), 255—278.
null Maass, K., Zehetmeier, S., Weihberger, A., & Flosser, K. Analysing mathematical modelling tasks in light of citizenship education using the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study ZDM-Mathematics Education 2023 55 1 133 145 Maass, K., Zehetmeier, S., Weihberger, A., & Flosser, K. (2023). Analysing mathematical modelling tasks in light of citizenship education using the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 55(1), 133—145.
null Manz, E., & Georgen, C. Interlocking models in classroom science Science & Education 2023 107 6 1399 1434 Manz, E., & Georgen, C. (2023). Interlocking models in classroom science. Science & Education, 107(6), 1399—1434.
null Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D. & Berland, L. Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2018 55 7 1053 1075 Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D. & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053—1075.
null National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Science and Engineering in Preschool Through Elementary Grades: The Brilliance of Children and the Strengths of Educators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
null National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2021). Call to Action for Science Education: Building Opportunity for the Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
null Nersessian, N. (2022). Interdisciplinarity in the Making: Models and Methods in Frontier Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
null Oreskes, N. (2021). Why Trust Science? Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
null Plaisance, K. S. The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2020 83 53 62 Plaisance, K. S. (2020). The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 83, 53—62.
null Price, J. The landing zone——Ground for model transfer in chemistry Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2019 77 21 28 Price, J. (2019). The landing zone——Ground for model transfer in chemistry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 77, 21—28.
null Ramberg, P. J. What is an element? A collection of essays by chemists, philosophers, historians, and educators Foundations of Chemistry 2021 23 3 465 473 Ramberg, P. J. (2021). What is an element? A collection of essays by chemists, philosophers, historians, and educators. Foundations of Chemistry, 23(3), 465—473.
null Shtulman, A., & Young, A. G. Learning evolution by collaboration Bioscience 2021 71 10 1091 1102 Shtulman, A., & Young, A. G. (2021). Learning evolution by collaboration. Bioscience, 71(10), 1091—1102.
null Slater, L. Instruments and rules: R.B. Woodward and the tools of Twentieth-Century organic chemistry Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2002 33 1 33 Slater, L. (2002). Instruments and rules: R.B. Woodward and the tools of Twentieth-Century organic chemistry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 1—33.
null Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C. E., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions Science 2009 323 122 124 Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C. E., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323, 122—124.
null Wieman, C. (2017). Improving How Universities Teach Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
文章导航

/