在探讨教育人性化时,学术界多从教育反人性化视角透视教育中存在的问题。忽略对教育反人性化概念本身的深层次剖析,混淆其与教育非人性化和教育弱人性化之间的关系。通过目的-手段范畴揭示、澄清三者之内涵、界限与关系,结果表明,教育反人性化的本质是“驯化”的教育,即背离人性的教育;教育非人性化的本质是“物化”的教育,即脱离人性的教育;教育弱人性化的本质是“异化”的教育,即偏离人性的教育。故此,教育要走向本真、圆融和自由,亦即:脱离“驯化”的羁绊,逃避“物化”的罗网,摆脱“异化”的藩篱。
In exploring humanized education, researchers tend to look at education problems from the perspective of anti-humanization, without a further analysis of the concept of anti-humanized education. The difference among anti-humanization, dehumanization and weak humanization in education is obscure. Using the category of purpose–means, we seek to reveal and clarify the connotation of the three, their boundaries and interrelationships. We argue that the core of the anti-humanized education is domestication of education,which violates humanity; while the core of dehumanized education is the materialization of education, which is separate from humanity; and the core of weak humanization is alienation of education, which deviates from humanity. Therefore, education should develop towards truth–breaking away from the fetters of domestication, towards harmony–evading the snare of materialization, and towards freedom –getting rid of the fence of alienation.