与注重关键少数的"简化范式"不同,综合素质是关系性思维的产物,主要是指人身心、知行、文理等多方面协调发展,广泛适应现实生活中各种变化与挑战所必须具备的能力和品质。其中,身心关系范畴最广,知行次之,文理复次之。在应对变动不居的未来世界的挑战中,综合素质更为有效。当然,核心素养体系对综合素质中的关键性要素做了具体的刻画、描述,有助于我们对综合素质的认识,特别是对不同层次、不同方面素质关系的把握变得更加清晰,两者关系是互补性的,而非取代与被取代的关系。
From different perspectives and methodologies, both key competency and comprehensive quality seek to answer the fundamental question of"What kind of person do we want to cultivate?" On the one hand, it's believed that key competency emphasizes on the key elements out of the numerous, following a simplified paradigm of scientific analysis used in the western academic community. On the other hand, comprehensive quality is closely related to the systematic, relational and generative thinking and value orientations, which emphasizes more on the balance and harmony of human development, including the relationships between body and mind, knowing and doing, humanity and science. Further research on comprehensive quality needs to examine not only what the constituent qualities are, but also what relationships there are between them that have defined the implications of the conception, as it is such relationships that have constituted the"hard core" of the conception.#br#The term quality in the Chinese context is not limited to the inborn traits from the perspective of physiological anatomy, but the harmony of body and mind, the combination of nature and nurture, as well as their interdependence. It also means the unity of knowing and doing, as the true knowing is the authentic experience from doing, while effective doing involves prospective and reflective thinking. Besides, it is the accommodation of humanity and science, which allows wise decisions and actions to happen in certain circumstance based on the comprehensive consideration of appropriate information.#br#Future is beyond our imagination. Compared with key competency, which stresses the"key" and"few", the conception of comprehensive quality, which is rooted in the Chinese culture and stresses more on the extensive adaptability, has its own advantages, and thus could be an effective strategy responding to the ever-changing future. There is no denying that key competency describes the key elements of comprehensive quality, which helps deepen our understanding of comprehensive quality, especially the relationships between different layers and aspects. In other words, the relationship between key competency and comprehensive quality is complementary, rather than substituted.
埃德加·莫兰,陈一壮译. (2001).复杂思想:自觉的科学.北京:北京大学出版社.
爱德华·威尔逊,梁锦玺译. (2016).知识大融通.北京:中信出版社.
薄一波(1991). 若干重大决策与事件的回顾.北京:中共中央党校出版社.
北京师范大学课题组. (2016).中国学生发展核心素养(内部资料).(北京).
邓小平. 把教育工作认真抓起来,邓小平文选(第三卷)(1993).北京:人民出版社.
马特·里德利,黄菁菁译.(2015).先天后天——基因、经验及什么使我们成为人.北京:机械工业出版社.
弗兰克·R·威尔逊,刑锡范译.(2008).手的奥妙.沈阳:辽宁出版社.
韩毓海.(2011).五百年来谁著史.北京:九州出版社.
教育部.(2012).义务教育体育与健康课程标准(2011年版).北京:北师大出版社.
经济合作与发展组织,周加仙等译.(2014)理解脑.北京:教育科学出版社.
课程教材研究所.( 2001).20世纪中国中小学课程标准、教学大纲汇编·思想政治卷.北京:人民教育出版社.
课程教材研究所.(2001).20世纪中国中小学课程标准、教学大纲·生物卷.北京:人民教育出版社.
课程教材研究所.(2001).20世纪中国中小学课程标准、教学大纲汇编·课程(教学)计划卷).人民教育出版社.
理查德· M·勒纳,张文新主译.(2011).人类发展的概念与理论.北京:北京大学出版社.
柳夕浪.(2014).从"素质"到"核心素养"——关于"培养什么样的人"的进一步追问.教育科学研究,(3).
鲁洁.( 2014).回望八十年. 北京:教育科学出版社.
钱俊瑞.当前教育建设的方针. 人民教育第一卷第二期(1950年6月1日).
秦春华.(2015).美国考试机构在做什么.中国教育报.12月9日第11版。
素质教育调研组.(2006). 共同的关注——素质教育系统调查.北京:教育科学出版社.
韦政通.(2009).中国哲学辞典。长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司.
吴军.(2016).智能时代.北京:中信出版社.
赵勇.(2014).就业?创业?北京:教育科学出版社.
中共中央文献编辑委员会.(1991).毛泽东选集(第1卷).北京:人民出版社.