学科课程标准是人才培养规格学科化的表述，是国家教学指导性文件，是教师实施教学的重要依据。教师实施课程标准的测量是评估课程改革的效果、分析课程实施影响因素、揭示教学过程质量的必然要求。教师实施课程标准的测量分为理解与动机、行动与策略、结果与反思三个维度，每个维度再分为具体的子维度，然后按照子维度编制大规模调查的问卷。经过严格抽样，获取试测数据，并将试测数据进行非旋转主成分分析、探索性因素分析、效度分析和信度分析，最后形成信效度较好的教师实施课程标准调查问卷。
The curriculum standard is a discipline-specific articulation of talent cultivation, offering a na-tional guideline for teaching as well as an important basis for teachers' teaching. The measurement of teach-ers' implementation of curriculum standards is an evitable requirement for examining the impact of curriculum reforms, analyzing factors of curriculum implementation, and assessing the quality of teaching. It can be di-vided into three dimensions:understanding and motivation, action and strategy, outcome and reflection. Each dimension is subdivided into specific sub-dimensions. Based on the sub-dimensions, a large-scale question-naire is developed. After rigorous sampling, we conducted a set of analyses, including non-rotating principal component analysis, exploratory factor analysis, validity analysis and reliability analysis. The analyses lead to a final questionnaire with strong reliability and validity.
陈霞. (2004). 基于课程标准的教育改革——美国的行动与启示.上海:华东师范大学.
陈侠. (1989).课程论.北京:人民教育出版社.
崔允漷.(2009). 课程实施的新取向:基于课程标准的教学. 教育研究,(1),74-79.
崔允漷,夏雪梅.(2013).论互动视野下的教师课程实施:基于40年文献的建构.全球教育展望,(10),3-12.
黄甫全.(2000).大课程论初探——兼论课程(论)与教学(论)的关系.课程·教材·教法,(5),1-7.
霍尔,霍德. (2004). 实施变革:模式、原则与困境(吴晓玲译). 杭州:浙江教育出版社.
李子建,尹弘飚.(2005). 教师对课程变革的认同感和关注. 教育研究与发展,(1),107-128.
马云鹏. (2001). 课程实施及其在课程改革中的作用. 课程·教材·教法,(9), 18-23.
施良方.(1996).课程理论:课程的基础、原理与问题.北京:教育科学出版社.
夏雪梅.(2009).教师课程实施程度的评估:一种整合架构.教育发展研究,(22),19-24.
夏雪梅.(2010). 课程标准的实施:我们需要检测什么?.课程·教材·教法,(8),10-14.
郑蕾.(2013). 美国SEC教师课程实施行为检测工具评析.全球教育展望,(10),13-19.
Brophy, J. E.(1982). How Teachers Influence What is Taught and Learned in Classroom. The Elementary School Journal, (1),1-13.
Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning:A guide to nominal group and Delphi process. Glenview, IL:Scott, Forseman.
Fullan, M.,& Pomfret, A.(1977).Research on Curriculum and Instruction Implementation.Review of Educational Research, 47(2),335-397.
Goodlad, J. I., Klein, M. F. & Tye, K. A.(1979).The Domains of Curriculum and Their Study.In J. I. Goodlad(Eds.).Curriculum Inquiry:The Study of Curriculum Practice. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Hamilton, Laura S., et al.(2016).What Supports Do Teachers Need to Help Students Meet Common Core State Standards for Mathematics? Findings from the American Teacher and American School Leader Panels. Santa Monica, Calif.:RAND Corporation.
Norman L. Webb.(1997).Determining Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education.Nise Brief, (2),1-8.
Waugh, R. F. & Godfrey, J.(1995).Understanding Teachers' Receptivity to System-wide Educational Change.Journal of Educational Administration, (3),38-54.
O'Day, J. A., & M. S. Smith.(1993).Systemic Reform and Educational Opportunity.In S. Fuhrman(ed.). Designing Coherent Education Policy:Improving the System, San Francisco, Calif.:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Opfer, V. D, Kaufman, J. H & Thompson, L.E.(2017).Implementing of K-12 State Standard for Mathematics and English Language Art and Literacy. Santa Monica:RAND Corporation.
Polikoff, M. S. (2015). How well aligned are textbooks to the common core standards in mathematics?American Educational Research Journal, 52(6),1185-1211.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
中国人文社会科学核心期刊