华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) >

2018 , Vol. 36 >Issue 4: 18 - 27+162

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.04.002

特稿

以学为本,提高质量,内涵发展:中国大学生学情研究的学术涵义与政策价值

  • 史静寰 ,
  • 王文
展开
  • 清华大学教育研究院, 北京 100084

网络出版日期: 2018-07-05

基金资助

教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"双一流建设背景下我国高校评价体系改革研究"（项目号：17JZD056）。

收起

Learner-Centered Education for Sustainable Development: The Academic and Policy Implication of Research on China College Student Learning

  • SHI Jinghuan ,
  • WANG Wen
Expand
  • Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Online published: 2018-07-05

Fold

摘要

注重以"学"（学生、学习、学校）为本，提高人才培养质量，是实现高等教育内涵发展的核心要义。本研究通过梳理国内外有关大学生学习研究的主要理论和成果，总结清华大学"中国大学生学习与发展追踪研究"（China College Student Survey，CCSS）十年来在学术研究和实践改革中积累的经验与思考，结合新时代中国高等教育发展的需要与前景，提出具有中国特色的大学生学情研究的整体分析框架，并阐释大学生学情研究的学术涵义与政策价值。

关键词： 大学生学情研究; 大学生学习投入; 高等教育内涵式发展; 中国大学生学习与发展追踪研究(CCSS)

本文引用格式

史静寰 , 王文 . 以学为本,提高质量,内涵发展:中国大学生学情研究的学术涵义与政策价值[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018 , 36(4) : 18 -27+162 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.04.002

Abstract

Quality improvement through learner-centered education is the core of the sustainable develop-ment in higher education. This study is based on a review of some related theories and researches on college student learning and the experience of China College Student Survey (CCSS) over the past decade in educa-tional research and practice. Additionally, a holistic analytical framework of student learning with Chinese characteristics is developed and the policy and academic implications of the study have been discussed in the paper.

Key words： research on college student learning and development; college student engagement; sustain-able development of higher education; China College Student Survey (CCSS)

参考文献

傅承哲. (2012). 本土化学生学习调查工具的开发初探. 复旦教育论坛, 10(3), 43-47.
龚放,吕林海. (2012). 中美研究型大学本科生学习参与差异的研究——基于南京大学和加州大学伯克利分校的问卷调查. 高等教育研究, 33(9), 90-100.
贵州大学. (2016-11-24). 贵州大学2015 年度本科教学质量报告. 2018-01-12.取自http://www.gzu.edu.cn/picture/article/2/63/5f/0f427c6148deb4fdce89ba5d7d9a/c0d46a2c-d552-4b6d-adcc-37dfcad1f33e.pdf.
华东师范大学学报教育科学版. (2018-03-10). "交叉融合的教育科学基础研究暨自然科学基金项目研讨会"举行. 2018-03-11.取自http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/buWr0PtcsVBzMIXJ9Y-J8Q.
林惠青.(2017-11-13).努力开创高等教育发展新局面. 中国教育报, 001版, 1-2.
陆根书, 胡文静, 闫妮. (2013). 大学生学习经历:概念模型与基本特征——基于西安交通大学本科生学习经历的调查分析. 高等教育研究, 34(8), 53-61.
罗燕, 海蒂·罗斯,岑逾豪. (2009). 国际比较视野中的高等教育测量——NSSE-China工具的开发:文化适应与信度、效度报告. 复旦教育论坛, 7(5), 12-18.
罗燕, 史静寰,涂冬波. (2009). 清华大学本科教育学情调查报告2009——与美国顶尖研究型大学的比较. 清华大学教育研究, 5, 1-13.
吕林海,张红霞. (2015). 中国研究型大学本科生学习参与的特征分析——基于12所中外研究型大学调查资料的比较. 教育研究, 9, 51-63.
吕林海. (2016). 大学生学习参与的理论缘起、概念延展及测量方法争议. 教育发展研究, 21, 70-77.
南京理工大学课题组. (2016-01-08). 学情调查数据在实践中的应用. CCSS 2015年度数据分析研讨会上的发言, 北京.
清华大学. (2013-09-27). 清华大学第24次教育工作讨论会开幕. 2018-03-29.取自http://news.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9948/2013/20130927173455499728551/20130927173455499728551_.html.
清华大学. (2018-03-29). 清华大学第25次教育工作讨论会开幕. 2018-03-29.取自http://news.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9648/2018/20180329192748224920128/20180329192748224920128_.html.
瞿振元. (2013). 高等教育内涵式发展的实现途径. 中国高等教育, 2, 12-13, 21.
上海师范大学高等教育研究所项目组. (2016). 大学生学习性投入的理论与实践. 上海:上海教育出版社.
史静寰. (2016). 走向质量治理:中国大学生学情调查的现状与发展. 中国高教研究, 2, 37-41.
史秋衡,郭建鹏. (2012). 我国大学生学情状态与影响机制的实证分析. 教育研究, 2, 109-121.
涂冬波, 史静寰,郭芳芳. (2013). 中国大学生学习性投入调查问卷的测量学研究. 复旦教育论坛, 1, 55-62.
汪雅霜. (2013). 大学生学习投入度的实证研究——基于2012年"国家大学生学习情况调查"数据分析. 中国高教研究, 1, 32-36.
王文, 张清,史静寰. (2014). 基于学习过程的基础学科拔尖人才培养研究——以山东大学泰山学堂为例. 大学教育科学, 2, 58-64.
王战军. (2013). 推进内涵式发展 提高高等教育质量. 北京联合大学学报, 27(2), 1-5.
魏署光,陈敏. (2016). 本科生学习效果影响机制研究——基于华中科技大学SSLD的分析. 高等工程教育研究, 2, 167-173.
文雯,管浏斯. (2012). 自主招生学生大学学习过程初探——以九所"985"、"211"高校自主招生群体为例的实证研究. 清华大学教育研究, 33(3), 98-104.
新华网. (2018-03-11). 刘伟:高等教育自信是文化自信的有机组成部分. 2018-03-29.取自http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018lh/2018-03/11/c_129827408.htm.
吴岩. (2014). 高等教育公共治理与"五位一体"评估制度创新. 中国高教研究, 12, 14-18.
徐波. (2013). 高校学生投入:从理论到实践. 教育研究, 7, 147-154.
杨立军,韩晓玲. (2014). 基于NSSE-CHINA问卷的大学生学习投入结构研究. 复旦教育论坛, 12(3), 83-90.
杨钋,许申. (2010). 本专科学生能力发展的对比研究——基于"2008年首都高校学生发展状况调查"相关数据的分析. 教育发展研究, 5, 17-22.
尹弘飚. (2016). 大学生学习投入的研究路径及其转型. 高等教育研究, 11, 70-76.
曾家延. (2017). 指向大规模测量建构的学生参与研究评析. 比较教育研究, 4, 46-53.
张娜. (2012). 国内外学习投入及其学校影响因素研究综述. 心理研究, 5(2), 83-92.
中国高等教育学会专题研究组.(2017).走向2030:中国高等教育现代化建设之路.中国高教研究, 5, 1-14.
中国青年网. (2018-03-08). 全国政协委员张炜:高等教育既要重数量也要重质量. 2018-03-29.取自http://news.youth.cn/2018qglhyc/201803/t20180308_11480538.htm.
中青在线. (2018-03-05). 吕建代表:追求内涵式发展的高等教育没有休止符. 2018-03-29.取自http://news.cyol.com/content/2018-03/05/content_16992553.htm.
赵炬明. (2018). 聚焦设计:实践与方法——美国以学生为中心的本科教学改革研究之三(下), 高等工程教育研究, 3. 2018-04-03.取自http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/EP1SGM5ETmNAdSNm-dYO8g.
周廷勇, 周作宇,杜瑞军. (2016). 大学生发展的影响因素模型:一个理论构想. 教育学报. 12(5), 68-80.
周廷勇,周作宇. (2012). 高校学生发展影响因素的探索性研究. 复旦教育论坛, 10(3), 48-55, 86.
朱红. (2010). 高校学生参与度及其成长的影响机制——十年首都大学生发展数据分析. 清华大学教育研究, 31(6), 35-43, 63.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement:Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44,427-445.
Arnett, J. J. (1997). Young people's conceptions of the transition to adulthood. Youth & Society, 29(1):2-23.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood:A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5):469-480.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement:A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed.). Bethesda, MD:National Association of School Psychologists.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics.
Finn, J. D. (2006). The adult lives of at-risk students:The roles of attainment and engagement in high school (NCES 2006-328). Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement:Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
Fryer, L., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Student Learning in Higher Education:Where We Are and Paths Forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 199-203.
Hu, S. & Kuh, G.D. (2003). Diversity Experiences and College Student Learning and Development. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 320-334.
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758-773.
Kezar, A., & J. Kinzie. (2006). Examining the ways institutions create student engagement:The role of mission. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 149-172.
Khan, P. E. (2014). Theorising student engagement in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 40, 1005-1018.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement:Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5-20.
Luo, Y. (2015). Learning ants:A portrait of Chinese college students in mass higher education. In J. C. Shin, G. A. Postiglione, & F. Huang (Eds.), Mass higher education development in East Asia:Strategy, quality, and challenges (pp. 177-188). Cham:Springer International Publishing.
McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2013). Student engagement:Bridging research and practice to improve the quality of undergraduate education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education:Handbook of theory and research, (Vol. 28, pp. 47-92). Dordrecht:Springer.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2018). About NSSE. 2018-01-10.取自http://nsse.indiana.edu/html/about.cfm.
Newmann, F.M., Wehlage, G. G., & S. Lamborn. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools, ed. F.M. Newmann, (pp. 11-39). New York:Teachers College Press.
Pace, C. R. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10-16.
Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences. An account of the development and use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. Los Angeles:Higher Education Research Institute.
Pascarella, E.T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development:A critical review and synthesis. In:Smart, J.C. (ed.) Higher education:Handbook of theory and research. (pp. 1-62). New York:Agathon.
Pike, G. R. & Kuh, G. D. (2005). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 2, 285-209.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2004). Methodological Issues in Questionnaire-Based Research on Student Learning in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 347-358.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College:Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning:Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 359-384.
Yazzie-Mintz, E., & McCormick, K. (2012). Finding the humanity in the data:Understanding, measuring and strengthening student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. (pp. 743-761). New York:Springer.
Wang, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement:A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
Zepke, N. (2014). Student engagement research in higher education:Questioning an academic orthodoxy. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 697-708.
Zepke, N. (2015). Student engagement research thinking beyond the mainstream. Higher Education Research and Development, 34, 1311-1323.
Zusho, A. (2017). Toward an Integrated Model of Student Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 301-324.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉