专题:中国大学生学情研究

大学生自我报告的学习投入可靠吗——大学生群体的社会称许性反应及对自陈式问卷调查的影响

  • 郭菲 ,
  • 赵琳 ,
  • 连志鑫
展开
  • 清华大学教育研究院, 北京 100084

网络出版日期: 2018-07-05

基金资助

教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"双一流建设背景下我国高校评价体系改革研究"(项目号:17JZD056)。

Reliability of Self-reported Data in College Student Engagement Surveys: Social Desirability Bias in Self-reported Survey

  • GUO Fei ,
  • ZHAO Lin ,
  • LIAN Zhixin
Expand
  • Tsinghua University, Institute of Education, Beijing 100084, China

Online published: 2018-07-05

摘要

以"学"为中心的高等教育质量评价理念,推动了国内大学生学情调查的广泛开展。此类调查使用自陈式问卷进行,其数据质量可能受填答者社会称许性反应的影响。使用清华大学2014-2016年"中国大学生学习与发展追踪研究"的数据研究发现:有关学习行为和主观感受的自陈性指标存在5-10%的社会称许性反应偏误,但自我汇报的客观情况(如学习成绩)偏误较小;学生的社会称许性水平越高,自陈性指标中的偏误越大;指标内容与社会称许性反应偏误的大小有一定关系。上述发现对大学生学情调查的科学性和工具开发的有效性具有方法论的意义。

本文引用格式

郭菲 , 赵琳 , 连志鑫 . 大学生自我报告的学习投入可靠吗——大学生群体的社会称许性反应及对自陈式问卷调查的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018 , 36(4) : 53 -61+163 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.04.005

Abstract

Inspired by learner-centered and evidence-based evaluation in higher education quality assur-ance, investigations on college student experience and engagement become increasingly popular in China. However, with self-reported survey as a major instrument, the quality of data collected in such investigations is vulnerable to bias caused by socially desirable responses. Using data from the China College Student Survey (CCSS) in 2014-2016, the authors found that indicators constructed from student self-reported data on learn-ing activities and perceptions are subject to a social desirability response bias of 5-10%, while the bias in ob-jective information reported in the survey (such as GPA) is negligible. What's more, the higher the students' social desirability level, the larger the bias. It's also found that the size of social desirability bias shows its correlation with the content of the question items and indicators. These findings have methodological signifi-cance for quantitative investigations in social sciences. Further, implications for survey instrument develop-ment are discussed.

参考文献

韩振华,任剑峰. (2002). 社会调查研究中的社会称许性偏见效应. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 16(3), 47-50.
蒋华林, 邢全超, 吴芳,朱晓华. (2014). "社会称许性"影响大学生学情调查的实证研究. 大学教育科学, 6(6), 105-111.
李强, 徐晟, 李凌, 黄艳,徐旻. (2012). 心理健康素质测评系统·中国成年人多维社会赞许性量表的编制. 心理与行为研究, 10(4), 255-261.
刘萃侠. (2001). 马洛-克罗恩社会赞许性量表对中国被试适用性之初步验证.社会学研究, (2), 49-57.
吴燕. (2008). 人格测验中社会赞许性反应的测定与控制. 陕西师范大学.
徐晟, 李强, 李凌, 尹艺璇,梁栋. (2014). 心理健康素质测评系统·中国成年人社会赞许性全国常模的制定. 心理与行为研究, 12(6), 748-755.
赵丹. (2011). 马洛-克罗恩社会赞许性量表的修订及相关研究. 浙江师范大学.
赵琳,王传毅. (2015). 以"学"为中心:研究生教育质量评价与保障的新趋势. 学位与研究生教育, (3), 11-14.
赵志裕, 邹智敏,林升栋. (2010). 文化与社会赞许反应:社会个人互动的观点. 心理学报, 42(1), 48-55.
甄育玲. (2011). 社会赞许性反应量表的修订. 湖南师范大学.
Bowman, N. A., & Hill, P. L. (2011). Measuring how college affects students:Social desirability and other potential biases in college student self-reported gains. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(150), 73-85.
Cowen, E. L., & Tongas, P. N. (1959). The social desirability of trait descriptive terms:Applications to a self-concept inventory. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23(4), 361-365.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349-354.
Damarin, F., & Messick, S. (1965). Response styles as personality variables:A theoretical integration of multivariate research. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1965(1), 1-116.
Edwards, A. L. (1953). The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(2), 90-93.
Edwards, A. L., & Horst, P. (1953). Social Desirability as a Variable in 2 Technique Studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13(4), 620-625.
Fordyce, W. E. (1956). Social desirability in the MMPI. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20(3), 171-175.
Marlow, D., & Crowne, D. P. (1961). Social desirability and response to perceived situational demands. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25(2), 109-115.
Miller, A. L. (2012). Investigating social desirability bias in student self-report surveys. Association for Institutional Research, 36(1), 30-47.
NSSE. (2012). Are NSSE scores influenced by a desire to respond in a socially desirable manner? Retrieved August 23, 2017, from http://nsse.indiana.edu/pdf/psychometric_portfolio/2010 social desirability_formated.pdf.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598-609.
Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-Deception and Impression Management in Test Responses. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality Assessment via Questionnaires (pp. 143-165). Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding:The evolution of a construct. In I. Brown, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and education measurement (pp. 49-69). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
Sackeim, H. A., & Gur, R. C. (1978). Self-Deception, Self-Confrontation, and Consciousness. Springer US.
Saunders, D. G. (1991). Procedures for adjusting self-reports of violence for social desirability bias. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(3), 336-344.
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O.-S., Chan, K.-Y., Lee, W.-C., & Drasgow, F. (2001). Effects of the testing situation on item responding:Cause for concern. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 943-953.
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., de Jong, M. G., & Baumgartner, H. (2010). Socially Desirable Response Tendencies in Survey Research. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 199-214.
Wiggins, J. S. (1959). Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instruction. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23(5), 419-427.
Zerbe, W. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (1987). Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior:A Reconception. The Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 250-264.
文章导航

/