专题

杜威与孔子的对话:1919—2019

展开
  • 杭州师范大学教育学院, 杭州 311121

网络出版日期: 2019-03-21

John Dewey and Confucius in Dialogue: 1919-2019

Expand
  • School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China

Online published: 2019-03-21

摘要

当杜威于1919年抵达中国的时候,在他的哲学立场和儒家传统之间进行公正平等对话的时机尚未成熟。彼时,杜威声名鹊起,而儒家传统却急剧衰落。杜威受到了当时领军学者的热烈欢迎,而同时"打倒孔家店"的口号也正流行。与过去不同,今天的中国已经是世界大国,儒家传统也再次复兴。杜威和孔子对话的时代已经到来。儒家的道德自我修养理论可以补充杜威的教育方案,而杜威的积极学习策略则可以填充儒家与科学和技术教育之间的鸿沟。杜威在中国的系列演讲中就曾经涉及中国的科学和技术教育问题。

本文引用格式

伦纳德·瓦克斯 . 杜威与孔子的对话:1919—2019[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019 , 37(2) : 45 -52 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.005

Abstract

In 1919, when Dewey arrived in China, the time was not ripe for a dialogue on equal terms between his ideas and those from Confucian tradition. Dewey's reputation was on the rise; Confucianism was in sharp decline. Dewey was welcomed with open arms by China's leading intellectuals, while a popular slogan of the day proclaimed " Down with Confucius!" Today, by contrast, China is a great world power, and the Confucian tradition is once again ascending. It is now time to place Dewey and Confucius in dialogue, and to investigate how each can contribute to educational revitalization. In this paper I argue that the Confucian ideal of moral self-cultivation can supplement Dewey's educational program, while Dewey's active learning strategies can fill a gap in Confucian learning in science and technology, fields that occupied Dewey in his lectures in China.

参考文献

Allen, B. (2017). "Pragmatism and Confucian Empiricism", proceedings of the Conference, Fudan University.
Bary, W. T. D. (2007). "Confucian Education and the Point of Democracy", In W. T. De Bary. (Eds.). Confucian Tradition and Global Education, New York: Columbia University Press.
Boydston, J. A. (Eds.). (1967-1991). The Collected Works of John Dewey, 1882-1953. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bresciani, U. (2001). Reinventing Confucianism: The New Confucian Movement. Taipei: Taipei Ricci Institute.
Clopton, R. W. & Ou, T. C. (1975). John Dewey, Lectures in China, 1919-1920. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
Elliott, J. & Tsai, C. T. (2008). What Might Confucius Have to Say about Action Research? Educational Action Research, 16, 569–578.
Hall, D. L. & Ames, R. T. (1987). Thinking through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ho, H. C. & Schneider, A. (2009). Confucianism and Modern Society. Conference Paper. Leiden, The Netherlands, 28-29 May.
Sigurdsson, G. (2015). Confucian Propriety and Ritual Learning. Albany: SUNY Press.
Tan, S. H. (2004). Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Tan, S. H. (2012). The Pragmatic Confucian Approach to Tradition in Modernizing China, History and Theory, Theme Issue 51, 23-44.
Van Norden, B. (2014). Wang Yangming. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wang-yangming/.
Waks, L. (2018). Thinking in Dewey’s Experimentalist Education: The Contribution of the Internet and Digital Tools. ECNU Review of Education, 1 (2), 1–2.
Wang, J. C. S. (2007). John Dewey in China: To Teach and to Learn. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Yang, J. (2016). When Confucius "Encounters" John Dewey: A Historical and Philosophical Analysis of Dewey’s Visit to China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Zou, Z.H. (2010). The "Dewey Fever" in Jiangsu and Zhejiang during the May Fourth Movement and Its Relation to the Cultural Tradition in Jiangnan. Chinese Studies in History,vol. 43, 43–62.
文章导航

/