教师队伍建设

教师具有“以学为中心”的专业眼光吗:基于视频俱乐部的分析

  • 夏雪梅 ,
  • 方超群 ,
  • 刘潇
展开
  • 1. 上海市教育科学研究院,上海 200032;
    2. 华东师范大学课程与教学研究所,上海 200062;
    3. 上海学习素养课程研究所,上海 200032

网络出版日期: 2020-11-16

基金资助

国家社科基金全国教育科学“十三五”规划2019年度国家一般项目“项目化学习的中国建构与质量评估研究”(BHA190155)

Do Teachers Truly have a “Learning-centered” Professional Vision: An Analysis Based on Video Clubs

  • Xia Xuemei ,
  • Fang Chaoqun ,
  • Liu Xiao
Expand
  • 1. Shanghai Academy of Educational Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China;
    2. Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
    3. Shanghai Research Institute of Competency and Curriculum, Shanghai 200032, China

Online published: 2020-11-16

摘要

众多学校和教师都宣称关注学生的学习,在课堂中进行从教到学的转型。那么教师是否具有以学为中心的专业眼光,怎样的视频能够促进教师专业眼光的发展?本研究用视频俱乐部的方法对上述问题进行研究。研究结果表明,在视频的选择阶段,教师的专业眼光水平有一定的差异,大多数视频停留在表面的活动和学习形式上,而对营造安全氛围、设计挑战性任务、引发高阶思维、同伴论争、关注个体差异等关键维度的识别不高。在视频讨论阶段,教师们关于学生学习的观点推理体现了他们的专业眼光的差异。进一步的数据分析表明,争议性较大的视频,更能促进教师专业眼光的形成。

本文引用格式

夏雪梅 , 方超群 , 刘潇 . 教师具有“以学为中心”的专业眼光吗:基于视频俱乐部的分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020 , 38(11) : 90 -100 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.11.007

Abstract

Many schools and teachers claim that they stress students’ learning and endeavor to achieve the transitioning from teaching-centeredness to learning-centeredness in the classroom. So do teachers truly have a learning-centered professional vision? How can videos be used to promote the development of teachers’ professional vision? This study uses the video club approach to explore answers to the above questions. The results show that professional vision of teachers studied are more oriented towards superficial learning activities, and less oriented towards such key dimensions as creating a safe learning environment, designing challenging tasks, triggering higher-order thinking and peer arguments, and paying attention to individual differences. By analyzing three groups videos of varying degrees of learning-centeredness, it is also found that the average scores of the “focus on student” criteria and the “shared understanding” criteria are significantly different, while those of the “substantive discussion” criteria show no significant difference.

参考文献

崔允漷. (2015). 新课程改变了中小学课型了吗?——基于证据的初中课堂教学形态分析. 全球教育展望,44(01),15-24
邓玉梅, 何先友. (2004). 学习理论的社会文化观与建构观的本体论比较. 外国教育研究, (09),37-39+52
罗丽芳. (2017). 教师信念与实践不一致性: 影响因素、启示及展望. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版),39(02),60-64
雷浩.(2017).为学而教: 学习中心教学的研究.上海: 华东师范大学博士学位论文.
田兰,张志祯. (2015). 教师专业眼光的内涵与发展途径. 当代教师教育,8(01),35-40
杨帆,钟启旸. (2017). 教师建构主义教学能力的培养及其效果——基于TALIS 2013上海教师数据. 教育发展研究,37(18),50-57
张民选. (2019). PISA、TALIS与上海基础教育发展. 外国中小学教育, (04),1-9
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3−14). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group/Groupe Canadien d’étude En Didactique des Mathématiques.
Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359
Bernack-Schüler C., Leuders T., Holzäpfel L. (2015). Understanding Pre-Service Teachers’ Belief Change during a Problem Solving Course. In: Bernack-Schüler C., Erens R., Leuders T., Eichler A. (Eds.) Views and Beliefs in Mathematics Education. Freiburger Empirische Forschung in der Mathematikdidaktik. Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden
Borko et al. (2017). The role of video-based discussion in model for preparing professional development leaders.International Journal of STEM Education. doi:10.1186/s40594 -017-0090-3.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a Tool for Fostering Productive Discussions in Mathematics Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417-436
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R.(Eds.). (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: Natl Academy Press.
Chamberlin, M. T. (2005). Teacher discussions of students’ thinking: Meeting the challenge of attending to students’ thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(2), 141-170
Chieu, V.M., Herbst, P., Weiss, M. (2011). Effect of an animated classroom story embedded in online discussion on helping mathematics teachers learn to notice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(4), 589-624
Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4-15
Cohen, S. (2004). Teachersprofessional development and the elementary mathematics classroom: Bringing understandings to light. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Daniels, D. H., Kalkman, D. L., & McCombs, B. L. (2001). Young children’s perspectives on learning and teacher practices in different classroom contexts: implications for motication. Early Education and Development, 12(2), 253-273
Derry, J. S. (2007). Video research in classroom and teacher learning. In Ricki Goldman, Roy Pea, Brigid Barron, Sharon J. Derry. Video Research in the Learning Sciences (pp. 305-321). New York: Routledge.
Flook, L. Repetti, R. L., & Ullman, J. B. (2005). Classroom social experiences as predictors of academic performance. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 319-327
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633
Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS Video Study. Elementary School Journal, 101, 3-20
McCombs, B. L.(1997).Self-assessment and reflection:tools or promoting teacher changers toward learner-Centered practices. Nassp bulletin,81(587),1-14.
McCombs, B. L., Daniels, D. H., & Perry, K. E. (2008). Children's and Teachers' Perceptions of Learner-Centered Practices, and Student Motivation: Implications for Early Schooling. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 16-35
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15
Seidel, T. & and Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and Measuring the Structure of Professional Vision in Preservice Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739-771
Sherin. M. G. & Van Es., E. A. (2005). Using Video to Support Teachers' Ability to Notice Classroom Interactions. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 13, 475-491
Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. PEA, B. Barron, S. Derry. Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sherin. M. G., Linsenmeier, K. A. & van Es., E. A. (2009). Selecting Video Clips to Promote Mathematics Teachers' Discussion of Student Thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 213-230
Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276
Van Es, E.A. & Sherin, M.G. J. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155-176
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson(Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 173−209). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
文章导航

/