网络出版日期: 2021-08-04
基金资助
国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2020年度教育学一般课题“中学生责任伦理教育内容建构及实施途径研究”(BEA200114)
Can School Education Balance Equity and Quality?
Online published: 2021-08-04
教育公平与提升教育质量是各国教育政策的目标,我国政府始也终将发展公平而有质量的教育作为教育工作的重点。本研究采用分层线性模型,基于中国教育追踪调查追访数据,探究我国初中阶段学校教育公平与质量之间的关系。研究发现:从质量维度来看,在剥离了学生背景因素、学校构成因素的影响后,各学校对学生认知能力发展的促进作用具有显著差异;从公平维度来看,各学校对不同认知能力基础、不同性别学生群体认知能力发展的促进作用存在显著差异;从质量维度与公平维度之间的关系来看,部分学校在促进学生认知能力发展方面具有高效能,且在缩小认知能力基础或性别等因素对于学生认知能力发展的影响方面也具有高效能,证明了学校教育可以兼顾公平与质量。
魏晓宇 , 苏娜 . 学校教育可以兼顾公平与质量吗?[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021 , 39(8) : 116 -126 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.08.010
Achieving equity and quality is the goal of education policies in various countries. Governments at all levels in China always focus on the development of equity and quality in terms of education. Based on the data of China Education Panel Survey (CEPS), the study uses a hierarchical linear model to explore the relationship between the equity and quality of school education in junior middle school. The results indicate that: from the perspective of quality, after removing the influence of students’ background factors and school composition factors, the promotion effect of each school on the development of students’ cognitive ability is significantly different; from the perspective of fairness, the promotion effect of each school on the development of students of different genders and cognitive ability bases is different; from the perspective of relationship between the quality dimension and the fairness dimension, some schools not only has high performance in promoting the development of cognitive ability of students but also excels at reducing the cognitive gap between students of different gender or cognitive ability.This demonstrates that school education could balance equity and quality.
null | 边玉芳, 林志红 增值评价: 一种绿色升学率理念下的学校评价模式 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版) 2007 06 11 18 边玉芳, 林志红. (2007). 增值评价: 一种绿色升学率理念下的学校评价模式. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),(06),11—18. |
null | 程红艳 教育公平与教育质量关系之辩 南京社会科学 2014 11 116 123 程红艳. (2014). 教育公平与教育质量关系之辩. 南京社会科学,(11),116—123. |
null | 侯玉娜, 沈爱祥 学校资源对上海基础教育质量与公平的影响——基于国际学生评估项目(PISA2009)数据的实证研究 教育学术月刊 2014 09 38 45 侯玉娜, 沈爱祥. (2014). 学校资源对上海基础教育质量与公平的影响—基于国际学生评估项目(PISA2009)数据的实证研究. 教育学术月刊,(09),38—45. |
null | 贾群生 公平而有质量的教育:一种教育社会学的诠释 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版) 2019 02 58 69 贾群生. (2019). 公平而有质量的教育:一种教育社会学的诠释. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版),(02),58—69. |
null | 陆璟 上海基础教育公平的实证研究 教育研究 2013 34 02 77 84 陆璟. (2013). 上海基础教育公平的实证研究. 教育研究,34(02),77—84. |
null | 陆璟 上海基础教育公平评价的新发展——基于PISA 2012数据的分析 教育发展研究 2014 33 04 1 8 陆璟. (2014). 上海基础教育公平评价的新发展—基于PISA 2012数据的分析. 教育发展研究,33(04),1—8. |
null | 马晓强, 彭文蓉, 托马斯 学校效能的增值评价——对河北省保定市普通高中学校的实证研究 教育研究 2006 10 77 84 马晓强, 彭文蓉, 托马斯. (2006). 学校效能的增值评价—对河北省保定市普通高中学校的实证研究. 教育研究,(10),77—84. |
null | 祁翔, 陈丽媛 民营化对教育质量与公平的影响——以上海民办普通初中为例 北京大学教育评论 2019 17 01 105 122+190 祁翔, 陈丽媛. (2019). 民营化对教育质量与公平的影响—以上海民办普通初中为例. 北京大学教育评论,17(01),105—122+190. |
null | 陶西平, 顾海良, 张力, 杨东平, 谢小庆, 赵中建, 庞维国 《每一个学生都成功法》七人谈 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2016 34 02 1 15 陶西平, 顾海良, 张力, 杨东平, 谢小庆, 赵中建, 庞维国. (2016). 《每一个学生都成功法》七人谈. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),34(02),1—15. |
null | 托马斯, 彭文蓉 运用“增值”评量指标评估学校表现 教育研究 2005 09 20 27 托马斯, 彭文蓉. (2005). 运用“增值”评量指标评估学校表现. 教育研究,(09),20—27. |
null | 张煜 学校效能评价——一种对学校进行综合评价与质量监控的理论与方法 中小学管理 1997 Z1 62 63 张煜. (1997). 学校效能评价—一种对学校进行综合评价与质量监控的理论与方法. 中小学管理,(Z1),62—63. |
null | 宗晓华, 杨素红, 秦玉友 追求公平而有质量的教育:新时期城乡义务教育质量差距的影响因素与均衡策略 清华大学教育研究 2018 39 06 47 57 宗晓华, 杨素红, 秦玉友. (2018). 追求公平而有质量的教育:新时期城乡义务教育质量差距的影响因素与均衡策略. 清华大学教育研究,39(06),47—57. |
null | Bosker, R., & Witziers, B. (1995). School effects: Problems, solutions, and a meta-analysis. In Proceedings of the International Congress on School Effectiveness and School Improvement. |
null | Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge. |
null | European Commission. (2020). Strategic framework for education and training. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework/index_en.htm |
null | Jesson, D. & Gray, J Slants on slopes: using multi-level models to investigate differential school effectiveness and its impact on pupils’ examination results School Effectiveness and School Improvement 1991 2 230 271 Jesson, D. & Gray, J. (1991). Slants on slopes: using multi-level models to investigate differential school effectiveness and its impact on pupils’ examination results. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2, 230—271. |
null | Kelly, Α Measuring “equity” and “equitability” in school effectiveness research British Educational Research Journal 2012 38 6 977 1002 Kelly, Α. (2012). Measuring “equity” and “equitability” in school effectiveness research. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 977—1002. |
null | Kelly, Α Measuring equity in educational effectiveness research: The properties and possibilities of quantitative indicators International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2015 38 2 115 136 Kelly, Α. (2015). Measuring equity in educational effectiveness research: The properties and possibilities of quantitative indicators. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(2), 115—136. |
null | Konu, A. I., Lintonen, T. P., & Autio, V. J Evaluation of well-being in schools: A multilevel analysis of general subjective well-being School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2002 13 187 200 Konu, A. I., Lintonen, T. P., & Autio, V. J. (2002). Evaluation of well-being in schools: A multilevel analysis of general subjective well-being. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 187—200. |
null | Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P Can schools achieve both quality and equity? Investigating the two dimensions of educational effectiveness Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 2011 16 4 237 254 Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. (2011). Can schools achieve both quality and equity? Investigating the two dimensions of educational effectiveness. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 16(4), 237—254. |
null | Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P., & Charalambous, E Searching for differential teacher and school effectiveness in terms of student socioeconomic status and gender: Implications for promoting equity School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2019 30 3 286 308 Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P., & Charalambous, E. (2019). Searching for differential teacher and school effectiveness in terms of student socioeconomic status and gender: Implications for promoting equity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(3), 286—308. |
null | Nuttall, D., Goldstein, H., Prosser, R., & Rasbash, J Differential school effectiveness International Journal of Educational Research 1989 13 769 776 Nuttall, D., Goldstein, H., Prosser, R., & Rasbash, J. (1989). Differential school effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 769—776. |
null | Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Jerrim, J. P., Guo, J., & Dicke, T Inequity and excellence in academic performance: Evidence from 27 countries American Educational Research Journal 2018 55 4 836 858 Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Jerrim, J. P., Guo, J., & Dicke, T. (2018). Inequity and excellence in academic performance: Evidence from 27 countries. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 836—858. |
null | Sammons, P., Nuttall, D. & Cuttance, P Differential school effectiveness: results from a reanalysis of the Inner London Education Authority’s Junior School Project Data British Educational Research Journal 1993 19 381 405 Sammons, P., Nuttall, D. & Cuttance, P. (1993). Differential school effectiveness: results from a reanalysis of the Inner London Education Authority’s Junior School Project Data. British Educational Research Journal, 19, 381—405. |
null | Strand, S Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness by ethnicity, gender, poverty and prior attainment School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2010 21 3 289 314 Strand, S. (2010). Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness by ethnicity, gender, poverty and prior attainment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 289—314. |
null | Strand, S Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness revisited Review of Education 2016 4 2 107 144 Strand, S. (2016). Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness revisited. Review of Education, 4(2), 107—144. |
null | Thomas, S., Sammons, P., Mortimore, P., & Smees, R Differential secondary school effectiveness: Comparing the performance of different pupil groups British Educational Research Journal 1997 23 4 489 512 Thomas, S., Sammons, P., Mortimore, P., & Smees, R. (1997). Differential secondary school effectiveness: Comparing the performance of different pupil groups. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 489—512. |
null | Van de gaer, E., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., De Munter, A., & Onghena, P School effects on the development of motivation toward learning tasks and the development of academic selfconcept in secondary school School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2009 20 235 253 Van de gaer, E., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., De Munter, A., & Onghena, P. (2009). School effects on the development of motivation toward learning tasks and the development of academic selfconcept in secondary school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 235—253. |
null | Van Damme, J., & Bellens, K. (2017). Countries strive towards more quality and equity in education: Do they show success or failure? Evidence from TIMSS 2003 and 2011, for Grade 4. In Cognitive Abilities and Educational Outcomes(pp. 127−148). Springer, Cham. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |