网络出版日期: 2022-03-01
基金资助
全国教育科学“十三五”规划国家一般项目“人工智能背景下教育的技术逻辑研究”(BAA190233)
Can Educational Robots Improve Student Creativity: An Meta-analysis Based on 48 Experimental and Quasi-experimental Studies
Online published: 2022-03-01
培养创新型人才已经成为我国建设科技强国、突破“卡脖子”技术难题的基本路径。迎合智能时代的教育变革潮流,利用机器人技术提升学生创造力体现出更丰富的实践价值和时代意义。本研究采用Meta分析法对国内外48项实验研究、6057条样本量进行编码处理,研究得出:1)教育机器人对学生创造力的整体影响效应为0.576,达到中等以上的影响水平,其中对学生创新实践能力的促进作用最为明显,对创新人格品质的影响程度一般;2)从学段来看,教育机器人对初中、小学的学生创造力影响效果较为明显;3)学科方面,机器人课程对学生创造力影响效果最好;4)教学主题中,原型创造对学生创造力影响程度达到中等以上水平;5)教学方式选择方面,探究式教学更能激发学生的创造力;6)相比普通教室,实验室环境对于学生创造力发展更为乐观。结合实地调研,提出以下实践建议:推广实施人工智能相关课程,兼顾教学过程中学生的创新人格及思维培养;注重低学段学生创造力培养,大力提倡软件编程教学;建构适用于机器人教学的创客教育模式,完善相关学科教师的培训体系及激励机制;促进实验室硬件、软件环境设计,多方面筹措教育机器人经费投入。
侯浩翔 , 张先义 , 王旦 . 教育机器人可以提升学生创造力吗?——基于48项实验与准实验研究的Meta分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022 , 40(3) : 99 -111 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.03.009
Cultivating innovative talents has become a basic path for our country to build a strong country in science and technology and solve the “stuck neck” technical problems.Catering to the trend of educational reform in the intelligent age, the use of robotics to enhance students’ creativity shows richer practical value and contemporary significance.In this study, 48 domestic and foreign experimental studies and 6, 057 sample sizes were coded using the meta-analysis method, and the findings show that, first, the overall effect of educational robots on students’ creativity was 0.576, reaching a medium or above level of influence. Among them, the effect of promoting students’ innovative practical ability was the most obvious, and the degree of influence on the quality of innovative personality was average. Second, from the perspective of the academic stage, the effect of educational robot on the creativity of students in junior middle school and primary school was more obvious; Third, in terms of disciplines, software programming had the best impact on students’ creativity, followed by information technology. Fourth, among teaching topics, prototype creation had the most impact on students’ creativity and the level was above the intermediate level. Fifth, in terms of the choice of teaching methods, inquiry teaching can better stimulate students’ creativity. Finally, compared with ordinary classrooms, the laboratory environment was more optimistic for the development of students’ creativity. Combined with field research, four practical suggestions are put forward. We need to promote the implementation of artificial intelligence-related courses, taking into account the cultivation of students’ innovative personality and thinking in the teaching process. Schools should focus on the cultivation of low-level students’ creativity, and vigorously promote software programming teaching. Also, schools need to create robots Maker education model, improve the training system and incentive mechanism for teachers of related subjects; schools should promote the design of laboratory hardware and software environment, and raise funds for educational robots in various aspects.
null | 邓静. (2013). 机器人课堂教学对小学生创新能力培养的研究. 成都: 四川师范大学, 47?48. |
null | 董翠敏, 刘永强 以机器人教育为平台培养大学生创新意识和能力 实验室研究与探索 2011 09 257 258+334 董翠敏, 刘永强. (2011). 以机器人教育为平台培养大学生创新意识和能力. 实验室研究与探索,(09),257—258+334. |
null | 甘秋玲 等 创新素养: 21 世纪核心素养 5C 模型之三 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版) 2020 2 57 70 甘秋玲 等. (2020). 创新素养: 21 世纪核心素养 5C 模型之三. 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版),(2),57—70. |
null | 侯浩翔 智能时代高校创新人才培养的实然困境与应然转向 中国电化教育 2019 06 21 28 侯浩翔. (2019). 智能时代高校创新人才培养的实然困境与应然转向. 中国电化教育,(06),21—28. |
null | 林崇德 创造性人才·创造性教育·创造性学习 中国教育学刊 2000 1 5 8 林崇德. (2000). 创造性人才·创造性教育·创造性学习. 中国教育学刊,(1),5—8. |
null | 林崇德. (2009). 创新人才与教育创新研究. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2; 121?132. |
null | 罗杰, 冷卫东. (2013). 系统评价: Meta分析理论与实践. 北京: 军事医学科学出版社, 196?201. |
null | 王小根, 张爽 面向创客教育的中小学机器人教学研究 现代教育技术 2016 26 8 116 121 王小根, 张爽. (2016). 面向创客教育的中小学机器人教学研究. 现代教育技术,26(8),116—121. |
null | 谢幼如, 刘嘉欣, 孙宁蔚, 等 智慧学习环境下学生科学探究心智技能的培养 开放教育研究 2016 02 106 114 谢幼如, 刘嘉欣, 孙宁蔚, 等. (2016). 智慧学习环境下学生科学探究心智技能的培养. 开放教育研究,(02),106—114. |
null | 辛倩倩. (2019). 基于mBlock图形化编程软件的教学应用研究. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 42?43. |
null | 朱丽彬, 金炳尧 Scratch程序设计课教学实践研究——基于体验学习圈的视角 现代教育技术 2013 23 7 30 33 朱丽彬, 金炳尧. (2013). Scratch程序设计课教学实践研究—基于体验学习圈的视角. 现代教育技术,23(7),30—33. |
null | Amabile T M A model of creativity and innovation in organizations Research in organizational behavior 1988 10 1 123 167 Amabile T M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123—167. |
null | Banerjee, Banny, and Theo Gibbs(2016). Teaching the Innovation Methodology at the Stanford d. school. Creating Innovation Leaders. Springer, Cham. 163?174. |
null | Benitti, F. B. V. Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review Computers & Education 2012 58 3 978 988 Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978—988. |
null | Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., et al Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum Computers & Education 2014 72 145 157 Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., et al. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145—157. |
null | Cavas, B., Kesercioglu, T., Holbrook, J., et al(2012). The effects of robotics club on the students’ performance on science process & scientific creativity skills and perceptions on robots, human and society[C]. Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop teaching robotics, teaching with robotics integrating robotics in school curriculum. 40?50. |
null | Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1999). Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. Handbook of Creativity. UK: Cambridge University Press, 313?335. |
null | Eguchi, A.(2016). RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education, 21st century skills, and technological advancement through robotics competition. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75: 692?699. |
null | Guildford, J. P The nature of human intelligence American Educational Research Journal 1967 5 2 249 256 Guildford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. American Educational Research Journal, 5(2), 249—256. |
null | Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings Sage Publications 2004 396 Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage Publications, 396. |
null | James, R. Morgan, April M., Moon, Luciana,R.(2013). Barroso, Engineering BetterProjects, Chapter, STEM Project-Based Learning. Sense Publishers, 30?33. |
null | Jonassen, D. H. Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model Educational Technology 1994 34 34 37 Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model. Educational Technology, 34, 34—37. |
null | Kahn, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., et al(2016). Human creativity can be facilitated through interacting with a social robot. 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 173?180. |
null | Kolb, D. A. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development New Jersey: FT press 2014 21 25 Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: FT press, 21—25. |
null | Kozbelt, B. A., Beghetto, R. A. &Runco, M. A(2010). Theories of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 321?447. |
null | Lindh, J., Holgersson, T.(2007). Does lego training stimulate pupils’ ability to solve logical problems?Computers & education, 49(4): 1097?1111. |
null | Masril, M., Hendrik, B., Fikri, H. T., et al The Effect of Lego Mindstorms as an Innovative Educational Tool to Develop Students’ Creativity Skills for a Creative Society Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing 2019 1339 1 1 9 Masril, M., Hendrik, B., Fikri, H. T., et al. (2019). The Effect of Lego Mindstorms as an Innovative Educational Tool to Develop Students’ Creativity Skills for a Creative Society. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 1339(1), 1—9. |
null | Nemiro, J., Larriva, C., Jawaharlal, M. Developing creative behavior in elementary school students with robotics The Journal of Creative Behavior 2017 51 1 70 90 Nemiro, J., Larriva, C., Jawaharlal, M. (2017). Developing creative behavior in elementary school students with robotics. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(1), 70—90. |
null | Park, I., Kim, D., Oh, J., et al Learning effects of pedagogical robots with programming in elementary school environments in Korea Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2015 8 26 1 5 Park, I., Kim, D., Oh, J., et al. (2015). Learning effects of pedagogical robots with programming in elementary school environments in Korea. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(26), 1—5. |
null | Sternberg, Robert, J. Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence CUP Archive 1985 45 68 Sternberg, Robert, J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. CUP Archive, 45—68. |
null | Sullivan, F. R. Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2008 45 3 373 394 Sullivan, F. R. (2008). Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373—394. |
null | Torrance, E. P.(1993). Understanding creativity: Where to start?Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 232?234. |
null | Urban, K. K. On the development of creativity in children Creativity Research Journal 1991 4 2 177 191 Urban, K. K. (1991). On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 177—191. |
null | Williams, D. C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., et al Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp Journal of research on Technology in Education 2007 40 2 201 216 Williams, D. C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., et al. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201—216. |
null | Yang, Y. T. C., Chang, C. H. Empowering students through digital game authorship: Enhancing concentration, critical thinking, and academic achievement Computers & Education 2013 68 334 344 Yang, Y. T. C., Chang, C. H. (2013). Empowering students through digital game authorship: Enhancing concentration, critical thinking, and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 68, 334—344. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |