教育法典编纂的现实意义与实现路径

  • 王大泉
展开
  • 教育部政策法规司,北京 100816

录用日期: 2022-01-06

  网络出版日期: 2022-04-27

The Practical Significance and Realization Path of Codification of Education

  • Daquan Wang
Expand
  • Department of Policies and Regulations, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100816, China

Accepted date: 2022-01-06

  Online published: 2022-04-27

摘要

教育法典编纂工作已被列入立法规划。编纂法典是一个领域法律制度成熟完备的标志。教育领域法律体系较为健全,条文的数量和质量都能满足要求,而且法律规范之间有内在的逻辑,制度成熟度较高,立法机关和主管部门也形成了工作共识,基本具备了法典编纂的现实基础。编纂教育法典无论是对于教育法学理论研究,还是对于教育法治实践,都具有重要意义,有助于以法治方式深入推进教育制度的改革创新。编纂法典要面对填补法律空白、教育转型、程序不清、理论准备不足等困难,需要优先填补教育法律空白,同时通过系统化、有组织研究的路径,以系统整合教育法律规范加局部创新的实质性编纂模式加以推进。

本文引用格式

王大泉 . 教育法典编纂的现实意义与实现路径[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022 , 40(5) : 1 -7 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.05.001

Abstract

The codification of education code has been included in the legislative programme.Codification is a sign of the maturity of a legal system in a field.The legal system in the field of education is relatively sound, and the quantity and quality of provisions can meet the requirements. Moreover, there is internal logic between legal norms, and the system is relatively mature. The legislative organ and the competent department have also formed a working consensus, which has a realistic basis for codification. The compilation of educational code is of great significance not only for the theoretical study of educational law but also for the practice of educational rule of law. It can promote the reform and innovation of educational system deeply by rule of law. Codification is faced with difficulties such as filling legal gaps, educational transformation, unclear procedures and insufficient theoretical preparation. It is necessary to give priority to filling educational legal gaps, and at the same time carry out systematic and organized research, and promote the codification through systematic integration of educational legal norms and partial innovation of substantive codification mode.

参考文献

1 安东尼?塞尔登, 奥拉迪梅吉?阿比多耶. (2019). 第四次教育革命. 北京: 机械工业出版社.
2 本书编写组. (2019). 中共中央关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定. 北京: 人民出版社.
3 关保英. (2021). 论治理体系现代化视野下的教育法治. 复旦教育论坛, (4), 20- 29.
4 郝德永. (2020). 教育治理的国家逻辑及其方法论原则. 教育研究, (12), 4- 13.
5 马怀德、李红勃. (2021). 关于编纂教育法典的立法建议.
6 马怀德、周洪宇、湛中乐、孙霄兵、王敬波、程雁雷、关保英、马雷军. (2021). 关于实现教育法法典化的讨论. 民主与法制, (47), 42—50.
7 孙霄兵、刘兰兰. (2021). 《民法典》背景下我国教育法的法典化. 复旦教育论坛, (1), 31- 37.
8 习近平. (2020). 论坚持全面依法治国. 北京: 中央文献出版社.
9 新华社记者. (2020?11?10). 发展公平而有质量的教育——党的十八届三中全会以来教育领域综合改革综述. 人民日报.
10 湛中乐. (2021). 论教育法典的地位与形态. 东方法学, (6), 111- 122.
11 中共中央宣传部、中央全面依法治国委员会办公室. (2021). 习近平法治思想学习纲要. 北京: 人民出版社, 学习出版社.
12 周洪宇、方皛. (2021). 学习习近平法治思想 加快编纂教育法典. 国家教育行政学院学报, (3), 16- 25.
13 朱永新. (2019). 未来学校: 重新定义教育. 北京: 中信出版集团.
文章导航

/