The Tension between Humanism and Instrumental Rationality: Value Orientation and Policy Practice of International Organization in Global Educational Governance

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.011

Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 95-102+168+169.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.011

Previous Articles Next Articles

The Tension between Humanism and Instrumental Rationality: Value Orientation and Policy Practice of International Organization in Global Educational Governance

SHEN Wei

Institute of International and Comparative Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-01-22

Abstract

Abstract: International organizations play an increasingly important role in global educational governance. It is necessary to clarify the path, content and rationale some main international organizations take in educational governance to achieve Education 2030. International organizations seem to be multilateral collaboration reinforced by international dialogues, communication and cooperation. And there is always the tension between humanism and instrumental rationality in its operation. Thus, in global educational governance, international organizations should be based on systemic design and implementation, and motivate local government to promote human development.

Key words: international organization, global governance in education, instrumental rationality, humanism

SHEN Wei. The Tension between Humanism and Instrumental Rationality: Value Orientation and Policy Practice of International Organization in Global Educational Governance[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2019, 37(1): 95-102+168+169.

References

《教育2030行动框架》起草委员会.(2016). 迈向全纳、公平、有质量的教育和全民终身学习——《教育2030行动框架》之实施方式(熊建辉,臧日霞,杜晓敏译). 世界教育信息. (4),16-24.
联合国教科文组织.(2005). 全民教育:提高质量势在必行. 巴黎:联合国教育科学及文化组织出版.
联合国教科文组织.(2015). 反思教育:向"全球共同利益"的理念转变? 巴黎:联合国教育科学及文化组织出版.
联合国教科文组织.(2016). 迈向全纳、公平、有质量的教育和全民终身学习——《教育2030行动框架》之前言、愿景、理念与原则(国家教育发展研究中心专题组译). 世界教育信息,(1),7-11.
森.(2002).以自由看待发展(任赜,于真译). 北京:中国人民大学出版社.
Alexander, N.(2001). Paying for education:How the World Bank and the international Monetary Fund influence education in developing countries. Peabody Journal of Education, (76), 285-338.
Bonal, X. (2004). Is the World Bank education policy adequate for fighting poverty? Some evidence from Latin American. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 649-666.
Brock-Utne, B. (2000).Whose education for all? The recolonization of the African mind. New York:Falmer Press.
Mundy, K., 2007. Education for all:Paradoxes and prospects of a global promise. In David, B. & Alexander, W. Education for all:Global promises, National challenges. Amsterdam. et.al:Elsevier JAI.
Elfert, M. (2015). Unesco, the Faure report, the Delors report, and the political utopia of lifelong learning. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 88-100.
Heyneman,S. P.(2003). Education, Social cohesion, And the future role of international organization. Peabody Journal of Education. 78(3), 25-38.
OECD.(2005). Progress and output results of the programme of work 2002 to 2006, Meeting of OECD education Chief Executives. September 23, Copenhagen.
UN.(2015). Goal4:Ensure inclusive and quality education for all and promote lifelong learning. Retrieved from:http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/
The World Bank Group. (2015). Public opinion research group. Retrieved from:http://countrysurveys.worldbank.org.
World Bank. (2002).Achieving education for all by 2015:Simulation results for 47 low income countries. Washington, DC:World Bank.

The Tension between Humanism and Instrumental Rationality: Value Orientation and Policy Practice of International Organization in Global Educational Governance

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments