本文依据皮亚杰的经典理论,对某些旨在否定皮亚杰理论的实验及其解释作了深刻的反思和批评,从而表明皮亚杰理论仍然具有很强的生命力。
弗内歇 . [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2000 , 18(3) : 47 -52 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2000.03.006
| null | R. Baillargeon, E. S. Spelke & S. Wasserman (1985). Object Permnanence in Five Month-0ld Infants. Coguition, 20, pp.191- 208. |
| null | M. Bovet & J. Vonèche (1977). Is Child Stimulation Effective? In A. Oliverio (Ed.) Genetics, Environment and Intelligence. Amsterdam: Elsevier/ North Holland Biomedical press. |
| null | T.C. R. Bower (1967). The Development of Object-Permanence: Some Studies of Existence Constancy. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, pp.411 -418. |
| null | T.C. R. Bower & J. G. Wishart (1972). The Fffeet of Mother Skills on Object Pemanence. Cognition, 1, pp.165-172. |
| null | M. Donaldson (1978). Children's Minds. Clasgow: W. Collins Sons and Co. |
| null | J. Fodor (1972). Some Reflections on L. S. Vygotsky's Thought and Language. Cognition, 1, pp.83- 95. |
| null | R. Gelman (1991). Epigenetic Foundations of Knowledge Structures: Initial and Transcendent Constructions. In R. Celman & S. Carey (Eds.) The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum. |
| null | B. lnhelder & G. Cellérier (1992). Le cheminement des découvertes de l'enfant. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niesule. |
| null | B. Inhelder & J. Piaget (1955). De la logique de l'enfant à la logique de l'adolescent: essai sur la construction des strutures opératoires formelles. Paris: P.U.F. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
中国人文社会科学核心期刊