The Types of Parental Involvement and Secondary School Students’ Subject Literacy: A Latent Class Analysis Based on the Data of Hong Kong and Macao in PISA 2018

  • Shenghua Huang ,
  • Hongbiao Yin ,
  • Yule Jin
Expand
  • 1. Faculty of Education, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    2. Faculty of Education, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China

Online published: 2022-12-29

Abstract

It is both theoretically and practically important to investigate the types and features of parental involvement and their relationships with secondary school students’ subject literacy. Using the data of Hong Kong and Macao in PISA 2018, this study conducted a latent class analysis (LCA) to identify four different latent classes of parental involvement. We then used the robust three step method (R3STEP)and BCH respectively to test how covariates such as region, student gender, and grade contributed to the classification of parental involvement and how different classes of parental involvement were related to students’ mathematics literacy, reading literacy, science literacy, and global competence. The results showed that (a) region, student gender, grade, family ESCS, and parents’ expectation of their child’s educational level were significantly related to, while the gender of parents/guardians who filled the questionnaire was not significantly related to the classification of parental involvement; (b) students of different parental involvement classes were in general found to be significantly different from each other in terms of their subject literacy. Specifically, students of Class 1 (Low Involvement Class, C1, 39.1%) were found to have the highest average scores in mathematics literacy, reading literacy, and science literacy, but not in global competence. Students of Class 2 (Busy and High Involvement Class, C2, 33.3%) were found to have slightly higher average scores in reading literacy than those of class 3 (Comprehensive and High Involvement Class, C3, 23.1%), but have lower performance in mathematics literacy, science literacy, and global competence than those of Class 3. Students of Class 4 (Limited and Moderate Involvement Class, C4, 4.5%) were found to have the lowest average scores in mathematics literacy, reading literacy, and science literacy, but have better performance in global competence.

Cite this article

Shenghua Huang , Hongbiao Yin , Yule Jin . The Types of Parental Involvement and Secondary School Students’ Subject Literacy: A Latent Class Analysis Based on the Data of Hong Kong and Macao in PISA 2018[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023 , 41(1) : 50 -59 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.01.005

References

null 李佳哲, 胡咏梅. (2021). 家长学习参与和中小学生学业成绩的关系研究——基于亲子关系和学习自信心的有中介的调节模型分析. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (7), 72- 83.
null 梁文艳, 孙冉, 叶晓梅. (2018). 核心素养视角下家长参与如何影响儿童的学业发展? ——基于城乡户籍和区域流动状况的差异分析. 教育经济评论, (3), 40- 60.
null 刘保中, 张月云, 李建新. (2015). 家庭社会经济地位与青少年教育期望: 父母参与的中介作用. 北京大学教育评论, (3), 158- 176+192.
null 罗良, 吴艺方, 韦唯. (2014). 高质量父母教育卷入的特征. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 53- 60.
null 王孟成, 毕向阳. (2018). 回归混合模型: 方法进展与软件实现. 心理科学进展, (12), 2272- 2280.
null 温忠麟, 谢晋艳, 王惠惠. (2023). 潜在类别模型的原理、步骤及程序. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 41 (1), 1-15.
null 夏媛. (2020). 家庭社会经济地位、父母教育期望、父母教育卷入对初中生数学学习投入影响的研究. 西南大学硕士学位论文.
null Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B.. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes, 21 (2), 1- 22.
null Bauer, D. J., & Shanahan, M. J. (2007). Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, N. A. Card (Eds. ), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 255−283). Routledge.
null Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H. J., Ritzen, H., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10- 30.
null Borgonovi, F., & Montt, G. (2012). Parental involvement in selected PISA countries and economies. OECD Education Working Papers (No. 73). OECD Publishing.
null Fan, X. , & Chen, M.. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (1), 1- 22.
null Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Holbein, M. F. D. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17 (2), 99- 123.
null Jeynes, W. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35 (2), 202- 218.
null Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2017). Mplus users’ guide (Version 8). Muthén & Muthén.
null Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte-Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14 (4), 535- 569.
null OECD (2017). PISA 2015 technical report. OECD Publishing.
null Pilgrim, C. C., Schulenberg, J. E., O’malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (2006). Mediators and moderators of parental involvement on substance use: A national study of adolescents. Prevention Science, 7 (1), 75- 89.
null Takashiro, N.. (2017). A multilevel analysis of Japanese middle school student and school socioeconomic status influence on mathematics achievement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29 (3), 247- 267.
null Wang, Y., Deng, C., & Yang, X. (2016). Family economic status and parental involvement: Influences of parental expectation and perceived barriers. School Psychology International, 37 (5), 536- 553.
Outlines

/