Principles of Student Placement in Elementary School: Beyond Teaching in Accordance with Learners' Aptitude

  • LU Xiaodong
Expand
  • Institute of Economics of Education, Graduate School of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Online published: 2018-01-12

Abstract

Teaching students in accordance with their aptitude is a classical education principle in China. Despite its advantages, there exist such problems as studentstereotypes by their teachers or classmates over the 6-year fixed placement in the same elementary school. Therefore, it's necessary to break up the fixed placement of students beyond the principle of teaching students in accordance with their aptitude. This may introduce new values in schools from eight aspects. First, the entrance examination and interview for kindergarten children to enter the elementary school would be useless and harmful. Second, the Chinese metaphor of Never lose at the starting line could be semantically and practically dispelled. Third, there would be little chance for teachers to label certain students underachievers. Fourth,more authentic, frequent changes could take place in primaryschools, which could enable students to learn in a changing world. Fifth, it is possible for students to get out of the small fixed circle of friends into a large circle of friends in schools.Sixth, teaching resources could be allocated more impartially. Seventh, breaking up the fixed placement of students could liberate the students, who would otherwise be the hostage of their teachers. Finally,parents would have no intention of class choice on their children's behalf.

Cite this article

LU Xiaodong . Principles of Student Placement in Elementary School: Beyond Teaching in Accordance with Learners' Aptitude[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2018 , 36(1) : 64 -76+162 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.01.008

References

包利民.(2003). 怀疑论与希腊哲学的特质.玉溪师范学院学报,(7),1-8.
蔡连玉.(2014). 教育起跑线:理论澄清与实践选择.教育理论与实践,(2),3-5.
赫尔巴特.(1989).普通教育学·教育学讲授纲要(李其龙译).北京:人民教育出版社.
克尔凯郭尔.(2012).哲学片段(翁绍军译).北京:商务印书馆.
李袁媛.(2014).论小学班主任对"后进生"的转化研究.才智,(17),155-155.
贾正银.(2011). 小学班主任对"后进生"的转化研究. 中国科教创新导刊,(27),213-213.
刘彭芝.(2011-11-07). 对拔尖创新人才要早发现早培养. 光明日报,(16).
卢晓东.(2014).超越因材施教.教育学术月刊,(10),3-17.
卢晓东.(2010).本科专业划分的逻辑与跨学科专业类的建立.中国大学教学,(9),10-15.
山东胜采小学.(2016) "阳光分班"方案.取自:http://www.xuezizhai.com/fanwen/81705.html.
芜湖市三山中心小学.(2016)."阳关分班"实施方案.取自:http://www.xuezizhai.com/fanwen/81705.html.
许双成,张立昌.(2015). 教育公平之殇——分层分班教学.西北民族大学学报:哲学社会科学版,(4),184-188.
薛海平,王蓉.(2016).义务教育教师绩效奖金、教师激励与学生成绩.教育研究,(5),21-33.
杨宁.(2012). 对"起跑线"隐喻的分析和批判.教育理论研究,(6),28-30.
扬子晚报.(2015-8-28). 校园分班潜规则揭秘:"求照顾"真的有用吗?.取自:人民网,http://edu.people.com.cn/n/2015/0828/c1053-27527185.html.
尹超.(2017).生命发展课程体系的建构与实施——以北京大学附属小学为例. 课程·教材·教法,(5),107-112.
于永川.(1979).我国古代教学原则.瞿葆奎主编.(1988).教育学文集·教学(中册).北京:人民教育出版社.
中国广播网.(2013-08-14).各地中小学分班乱象层出.取自:中国教育科研和计算机网,http://www.edu.cn/ji_jiao_news_279/20130814/t20130814_1000983.shtml.
朱德庸.(2016). 成名30年:绝对小孩朱德庸没有一天适应过.取自:散文网,https://sanwen.net/a/fzrxqbo.html.
Outlines

/