A Systematic Literature Review of the Empirical Research into Pre-service Teacher Education in China (2015—2019)

  • Song Huan ,
  • Tian Shixu ,
  • Wu Yuchen
Expand
  • 1. Center for Teacher Education Research of Beijing Normal Unversity, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability People’s Government of Qinghai Province & Beijing Normal University, Xining 810008, China

Online published: 2020-09-15

Abstract

Pre-service teacher education is a core issue in the field of teacher education policy, practice and research. In China, with the transition of teacher education, the gradual diversification of paradigms in the field of education research, and the focus on evidence-based policy decision-making and educational practice, the research outcomes of pre-service teacher education are gradually enriched. Based on the analysis framework of “teacher education research as a social practice”, this study comprehensively reviewed the empirical studies on pre-service teacher education published in Chinese journals during 2015—2019. It summarized explicit content of pre-service teacher education research, including research participants, research methods, researcher identity, research topics, research findings, etc. And the study further analyzes the underlying assumptions, logic of argument, micropolitics, quality of evidence and assumed implications in the researches. As revealed, in the past five year, the empirical research on pre-service teacher education and policy reform in China has relatively been fragmented, and there is a lack of response to changes in the social, political and economic environment and the demand for educational reform. On the whole, although the current research on pre-service teacher education highlights “practice”, it also suffers from an insufficiency in the theoretical teacher education curriculum. The existing research has the limits of repetitive research content, insufficient localised exploration and varied research quality. For example, apart from the weak standard of designs, the prominent single method and insufficient ethical concern, the logic of argument needs to be strengthened. In the future, we should enrich the topics of pre-service teacher education research, expand the team of researchers, and broaden the types of research methods.

Cite this article

Song Huan , Tian Shixu , Wu Yuchen . A Systematic Literature Review of the Empirical Research into Pre-service Teacher Education in China (2015—2019)[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020 , 38(9) : 78 -102 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.005

References

陈向明. (2009). 教师实践性知识研究的知识论基础. 教育学报,5(2),49-57+131
程巍, 王在勇, 王瑶. (2008). 高等师范教育专业学生的中小学教师职业认同现状调查. 教师教育研究,20(5),45-48
段元美, 闫志明, 俞树煜. (2016). 大四师范生TPACK构成机制研究. 教师教育研究,28(6),50-58
傅钢善, 刘娉婷. (2015). 免费师范生专业能力培养现状及提升策略研究——以陕西师范大学为例. 当代教师教育,8(2),73-81
高敬. (2019). 教育实习对学前教育师范生职业认同的影响——“幼有所育”政策背景下的研究. 教育发展研究, (8),58-66
顾明远, 李愷. (1979). 重视师范教育 提高师资质量. 人民教育, (4),28-30
侯小兵. (2015). 我学会当教师了吗——本科师范专业毕业生对教师教育有效性的反思. 当代教师教育,8(03),40-46
侯小兵. (2016). 师范生对国家教师资格考试的制度认同--基于东中西部4所高校的实证调查. 教师教育学报,3(4),64-71
侯小兵. (2017). 追求更加有效的教师教育——基于"师范生教师专业能力自我评估"调查. 教师教育学报,4(06),7-17
侯小兵, 唐娟. (2018). 师范生对教师核心素养的认知与培养. 当代教师教育,11(02),34-40
侯小兵, 谢大莲. (2019). 地方院校师范生学习动机与教学效能感的关系研究. 当代教师教育,12(03),33-39
胡维芳, 黄丽. (2016). 高校师范生教师职业认同及其影响因素研究. 教育研究与实验, (01),82-86
户清丽. (2018). 职前教师教育实践能力发展的层次性解析. 教育研究,39(05),93-98
季震. (1995). 试论教师教育的现代化. 南通师专学报(社会科学版), (03),43-46
江淑玲, 陈向明. (2017). 师徒互动对师范实习生专业观念的影响——交换理论的视角. 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版),35(6),126
教育部(2011). 教育部关于大力推进教师教育课程改革的意见. 北京: 教育部.
教育部(2013). 中小学教师资格考试暂行办法. 北京: 教育部.
教育部(2014). 教育部关于实施卓越教师培养计划的意见. 北京: 教育部.
教育部(2016). 教育部关于加强师范生教育实践的意见. 北京: 教育部.
教育部(2017). 普通高等学校师范类专业认证实施办法(暂行). 北京: 教育部.
教育部, 国家发展改革委, 财政部(2012a). 教育部、国家发展改革委、财政部关于深化教师教育改革的意见. 北京: 教育部.
教育部, 中央编办, 国家发展改革委, 财政部, 人力资源社会保障部(2012b). 教育部、中央编办、国家发展改革委、财政部、人力资源社会保障部关于大力推进农村义务教育教师队伍建设的意见. 北京: 教育部.
教育部, 国家发展改革委, 财政部, 人力资源社会保障部, 中央编办. (2018). 教师教育振兴行动计划(2018—2022年). 北京: 教育部
柯文进, 邓飞, 姜金秋, 陈祥梅. (2018). 农村籍师范生农村任教意愿影响因素分析——基于西部师范院校的调查. 复旦教育论坛,16(04),73-79
李佳源, 余利川. (2015). 地方院校免费师范生职业认同: 特征, 动力机制及强化路径——基于四川两所高校的调查研究. 复旦教育论坛,13(05),67-73
李录志, 陈一铭. (2015). 免费师范生职后教师生涯发展的困境. 当代教师教育,8(04),35-40
李运华. (2018). 师范生教师核心能力实证研究. 教师教育学报,5(3),23-30
梁荣华, 曹艳玲, 饶从满. (2018). 全日制教育硕士生反思能力初始状况研究——基于D师范大学的调查. 教师教育学报,5(03),53-61
刘佳, 方兴. (2015). 我国师范生农村从教意愿及影响因素的实证研究. 教师教育学报,2(05),72-79
刘丽平, 王强. (2019). 师范生专业技能训练的提升策略——以X师范大学为例. 教师教育研究,31(03),77-85
聂晓颖, 黄秦安, 魏金宝. (2015). 数学专业师范生整合技术的学科教学知识现状调查与分析. 当代教师教育,8(04),84-89
钱旭升. (2018). 四年一贯制全程实践效果的年级分析——以某师范大学小学教育专业为例. 教师教育研究,30(3),59-65
邵艳红, 张孔义. (2017). 卓越师范生适教性的诊断措施研究. 教师教育研究,29(01),72-78
石凡. (1980). 浅谈师范教育的地位和作用. 锦州师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), (01),7-11
石娟, 刘义兵. (2017). 职前教师专业发展的主观理论结构——基于RLTESECC项目交换生跨文化学习经历的启示. 教师教育学报,4(01),8-15
宋萑, 钟秉林. (2011). 走向实践与技艺化危险: 中美教师教育模式改革研究——中美教师教育比较研究之二. 高等教育研究,32(09),64-69
宋萑, & 周深几. (2015). 教师教育质量保障体系现状与问题探讨——基于12省(市)的调查分析. 中国高等教育, (24),35-37
宋萑, 周深几. (2016). 教育实习中师范生身份认同困境的人类学考察——一位新疆师范生的个案研究. 民族教育研究,27(06),46-53
宋萑. (2018). 质性研究的范式属性辨. 全球教育展望,47(06),56-66
谈心, 吴妮妮. (2016). 卓越班师范生与普通师范生教师职业认同感比较研究——以A大学为例. 当代教师教育,9(03),75-81
田友谊, 丁月. (2018). 免费师范生教育信仰的现状、影响因素与培育对策. 教育研究与实验, (01),31-34
王碧梅, 胡卫平. (2016). 职前教师和在职教师教学反思关注点比较. 教育科学,32(01),39-44
王娟, 何俊杰. (2018). 职前教师实践能力培养的调查研究. 教育研究与实验, (03),66-69
王宁. (2008). 个案研究中的样本属性与外推逻辑. 公共行政评论, (03),44-54+198
魏戈, 陈向明. (2015). 社会互动与身份认同——基于全国7个省(市)实习教师的实证研究. 教育学报,11(04),55-66+76
吴洪富. (2019). 促进科技与经济社会耦合发展的关键角色研究——论知识社会中的大学. 河南教育: 高教, (03),3-6
吴宗劲, 饶从满. (2018). 教师培养课程对职前教师从教准备度的贡献研究——基于效能期待的视角. 教育学报,14(02),78-88
徐国兴, 谢安邦, 刘海波. (2015). 师范毕业生的从教意向及其影响因素研究——以X大学为例. 教师教育研究,27(05),8-13
薛晓阳. (2017). 教育学的学科属性及其课程功能辨析. 教育研究,38(05),12-22
阳泽. (2018). 知识社会中人与知识关系的教育学审视. 教师教育学报,5(05),1-7
杨福义. (2017). 高等院校师范生教育效能感的调查与分析. 教师教育研究,29(02),71-74
杨烁, 余凯. (2019). 美国教育政策循证研究的理论与实践: 对中国的启示. 复旦教育论坛,17(06),91-96
杨跃, 梁圣翊. (2019). 师范生学习素养: 内涵, 结构与现状——基于省属师范院校本科师范生抽样调查的分析. 当代教师教育,12(03),40-47
尹小敏. (2015). 中小学教师对U-S合作培养师范生的阻抗分析——以现象学为视角. 中国教育学刊, (05),76-80
张彩丽. (2008). 近年来我国幼儿教师教育文献综述. 内蒙古教育, (08),13-15
张海霞. (2012). 教师素质之探究——中小学校长对新任教师的期望对师范生的启示. 科教导刊, (08),124-126+205
张河森, 林云, 崔莎莎. (2016). 艺体类免费师范生从教意愿实证研究——基于华中师范大学免费师范生的调查. 教师教育研究,28(04),57-63
张华军. (2012). 论理论性学习在教师培养中的作用——基于杜威思想的讨论. 教育学报,8(02),22-30
张景斌, 刘晓玫. (1991). 微格教学及其在我国教师教育中的作用. 中小学教师培训, (10),22-23
张倩, 李子建. (2014). 职前教师专业身份建构之困境与出路——对教师教育内涵式发展的思考. 课程· 教材· 教法,34(03),95-99
张释元, 陈向明, 邱霞燕. (2015). 师范实习生教师专业身份建构. 教师教育研究,27(04),74-79
张晓辉, 闾邱意淳, 赵宏玉, 齐婷婷, & 李庆安. (2015). 教育实习对师范生职业发展的影响: 基于典型个案的质性研究. 教师教育研究,27(06),52-58
张晓辉, 赵宏玉. (2018). 实习教师支持对师范生职业效能、职业认同及职业承诺的作用. 教师教育研究,3(03),46-52
张玉荣, 陈向明. (2014). 何以为师?——实习生的知识转化与身份获得. 教师教育研究,26(003),75-80.
张志泉, 殷杰. (2018). 小学卓越师范生培养质量的增值性评价研究. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),36(05),138-147
赵明仁. (2013). 先赋认同, 结构性认同与建构性认同——“师范生”身份认同探析. 教育研究,34(06),78-85
赵萍. (2017). 我国师范学院的机构转型与教师培养——对三所师范学院的个案考察. 教师教育研究,29(01),93-101
赵英. (2012). 回顾与反思: 教师教育改革研究三十年——基于研究视角的文献综述. 教育学术月刊, (07),60-63
赵玉芳, 左有霞. (2016). 免费师范生的教师职业信念: 自身及他人教育经验的差异分析. 教师教育学报,3(04),25-31
中共中央、国务院(2010). 国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020).
中共中央、国务院(2018). 中共中央、国务院关于全面深化新时代教师队伍建设改革的意见.
朱旭东, 胡艳. (2009). 中国教育改革开放30年(教师教育卷). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
朱旭东, 胡艳. (2019). 中国教育改革开放40年(教师教育卷). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
佐藤学. (2003). 课程与教师. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
Airton, L., & Koecher, A. (2019). How to hit a moving target: 35 years of gender and sexual diversity in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 190-204
Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Routledge.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 3-32.
Bourdieu, P. (2013). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1977)
Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K. L. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 40-87
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Thematic analysis, 843-860
Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach, revised edition. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Buchanan, R., & Olsen, B. (2018). Teacher identity in the current teacher education landscape. In Research on teacher identity. Springer, Cham, 195-205.
Chong, S., & Low, E. (2009). Why I want to teach and how I feel about teaching – formation of teacher identity from pre-service to the beginning teacher phase. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, (8), 59-72
Clandinin, D., & Husu, J. (2017). The Sage handbook of research on teacher education. London: SAGE.
Clarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating Teacher Participation in Teacher Education: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163-202
Cleyle, S., & Glynn, L. (2006). A critical appraisal tool for library and information research. Library Hi Tech.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2009b). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education, 69-109
Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. (2015a). Framing Teacher Preparation Research: An overview of the field, Part 1. Journal of Teacher oducation, 66(1), 7-20
Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. (2015b). Critiquing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part II. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 109-121
Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. (2015c). Studying teacher preparation: The questions that drive research. European Educational Research Journal, 14(5), 379-394
Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S., McIntyre, D., & Association of Teacher Educators. (2008). Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Cukier, K. & Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. London: John Murray.
Danyluk, P. J., Luhanga, F., Gwekwerere, Y. N., MacEwan, L., & Larocque, S. (2015). Failure to Fail in a Final Pre-Service Teaching Practicum. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(3), 5
El Kadri, M. S., & Roth, W. M. (2015). The teaching practicum as a locus of multi-leveled, school-based transformation. Teaching Education, 26(1), 17-37
Evans, N., Stevenson, R., Lasen, M., Ferreira, J., & Davis, J. (2017). Approaches to embedding sustainability in teacher education: A synthesis of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 405-417
Goldhaber, D. (2019). Evidence-Based Teacher Preparation: Policy Context and What We Know. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 90-101
Gordon, J., Halász, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., Michel, A., Pepper, D., .. & Wiśniewski, J. (2009). Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education. CASE network Reports, (87)
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205
Herndl, C. G., & Nahrwold, C. A. (2000). Research as social practice a case study of research on technical and professional communication. Written Communication, 17(2), 258-296
Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., & Glass, B. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: An “experiment” model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 6(3), 201-222
Hoffman, J. V., Wetzel, M. M., Maloch, B., Greeter, E., Taylor, L., DeJulio, S., & Vlach, S. K. (2015). What can we learn from studying the coaching interactions between cooperating teachers and preservice teachers? A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 99-112.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches(6th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
Lagemann, E. C. (2002). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. University of Chicago Press.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174
Loughran, J. & Hamilton, L. M. (2016). International handbook of teacher education. Singapore: Springer.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245-1251
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review.
Wiersma, W. & Jurs, S. G. (2009). Research Methods in Education: An Introduction (9th ed.). London: Pearson Education.
Zeichner, K. M. (1991). Contradictions and tensions in the professionalization of teaching and the democratization of schools. Teachers College Record, 92(3), 363-379
Zeichner, Ken. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4-15
Zeichner, Ken. (2012). The Turn Once Again Toward Practice-Based Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376-382
Outlines

/