?

Characterization of Deeper Learning: The Development and Application of Evaluation Tools: Based on Mathematics Learning of Primary School Students in Four Cities

  • Hang Hu ,
  • Xue Mi ,
  • Yaxin Li ,
  • Qi’e Lang
Expand
  • 1. College of Teacher Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
    2. College of Primary Education, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400715, China
    3. Faculty of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Online published: 2021-10-16

Abstract

Deeper learning quality includes individual learners, groups and deeper learning system. On the one hand, it is highly recognized by theoretical research; on the other hand, the difficulty of evaluation hinders in-depth research and classroom practice. Schema and SOLO theory provide a psychological basis for deeper learning evaluation, while the thinking visualization technology provides evaluation tools, so the learning thinking visualization system is designed and developed, including learning strategy software, cognitive structure software and PDA products. Using the developed evaluation system, the study diagnosed the math learning of more than 4,000 primary school students in S (east China), C (northeast China), W (central China) and K (southwest China). Through the analysis of a large amount of data, three conclusions are drawn: first, learning strategy and cognitive structure can be used as the effect quantity of deeper learning quality; second, the visualization system of learning thinking is effective in evaluating deeper learning; third, deeper learning classroom should be improved from the following three aspects: (1) learning content, we should pay attention to the integration of subject content, learning strategy and cognitive structure; (2) learning mode, we should focus on the operation mode and the structure of personalized learning and cooperative learning; (3) thinking quality, we should pay attention to the construction and generation of complex schema. The development and application of deeper learning quality evaluation tools will effectively improve the operability of deeper learning implementation.

Cite this article

Hang Hu , Xue Mi , Yaxin Li , Qi’e Lang . Characterization of Deeper Learning: The Development and Application of Evaluation Tools: Based on Mathematics Learning of Primary School Students in Four Cities[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021 , 39(11) : 73 -85 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.11.004

References

null 郭华 深度学习及其意义 课程·教材·教法 2016 11 25 32 郭华. (2016). 深度学习及其意义. 课程·教材·教法,(11),25—32.
null 何玲, 黎加厚 促进学生深度学习 计算机教与学 2005 5 29 30 何玲, 黎加厚. (2005). 促进学生深度学习. 计算机教与学,(5),29—30.
null 胡航. (2017). 技术促进小学数学深度学习的实证研究. 东北师范大学博士论文.
null 胡航, 董玉琦 技术怎样促进学习: 基于三类课堂的实证研究 现代远程教育研究 2017a 2 88 94 胡航, 董玉琦. (2017a). 技术怎样促进学习: 基于三类课堂的实证研究. 现代远程教育研究,(2),88—94.
null 黄爽, 霍力岩, 房阳洋 国外学习品质的本质与结构研究进展 比较教育研究 2019 41 04 106 112 黄爽, 霍力岩, 房阳洋. (2019). 国外学习品质的本质与结构研究进展. 比较教育研究,41(04),106—112.
null 姜强, 赵蔚 个性化自适应学习研究——大数据时代数字化学习的新常态 中国电化教育 2016 2 25 32 姜强, 赵蔚. (2016). 个性化自适应学习研究—大数据时代数字化学习的新常态. 中国电化教育,(2),25—32.
null 姜玉莲, 解月光 基于ESEM的高阶思维结构测量模型研究 现代远程教育研究 2017 3 94 104 姜玉莲, 解月光. (2017). 基于ESEM的高阶思维结构测量模型研究. 现代远程教育研究,(3),94—104.
null 雷雳, 侯志谨, 白学军 不同年级高师学生的学习动机与学习策略 心理发展与教育 2015 4 17 22 雷雳, 侯志谨, 白学军. (2015). 不同年级高师学生的学习动机与学习策略. 心理发展与教育,(4),17—22.
null 雷雳, 张钦 不良初中生的成败归因与学习动机 心理发展与教育 2014 4 12 21 雷雳, 张钦. (2014). 不良初中生的成败归因与学习动机. 心理发展与教育,(4),12—21.
null 刘爱伦, 水仁德. (2002). 思维心理学. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
null 刘电芝, 黄希庭 小学生数学学习策略的运用与发展特点 心理科学 2005 02 272 276 刘电芝, 黄希庭. (2005). 小学生数学学习策略的运用与发展特点. 心理科学,(02),272—276.
null 马里奥?希森. (2016). 热情投入的主动学习者——学前儿童的学习品质及其培养. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
null 王振宏, 刘萍 动机因素、学习策略、智力水平对学生学业成就的影响 心理学报 2014a 32 1 65 69 王振宏, 刘萍. (2014a). 动机因素、学习策略、智力水平对学生学业成就的影响. 心理学报,32(1),65—69.
null 王振宏, 刘萍 学习动机的自我理论与研究 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版) 2014b 47 2 89 93 王振宏, 刘萍. (2014b). 学习动机的自我理论与研究. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),47(2),89—93.
null 张美玲. (2012). 初中生数学学习策略及其与策略意识、思维风格、数学学业成绩关系. 温州大学硕士论文.
null 张亚玲, 郭德俊 学习策略教学对学习动机的影响研究 心理科学 2014 3 78 99 张亚玲, 郭德俊. (2014). 学习策略教学对学习动机的影响研究. 心理科学,(3),78—99.
null 张亚玲, 杨善禄 中学生学习动机与学习策略 心理发展与教育 2015 4 18 20 张亚玲, 杨善禄. (2015). 中学生学习动机与学习策略. 心理发展与教育,(4),18—20.
null Biggs, J. B The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F The British Psychology Society 2001 1 135 Biggs, J. B. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. The British Psychology Society, 1, 135.
null Biggs, J. B. (2014). Learning strategies, student motivation patterns and subjectively perceived success. In J. R. Kirby (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance. Academic press, INC.
null Biggs, J.B., Collis, K. F.(1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: the SO-LO taxonomy.New York: Academic Press.
null Brassard, M. R., Boehm, A. E. (2007). Preschool assessment: Principles and practices[M]. New York: Guilford Press.
null Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning Educational Researcher 1989 18 1 32 42 Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32—42.
null Carole, A. & Jerrifer, A Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes Journal of Educational Psychology 1988 88 3 260 267 Carole, A. & Jerrifer, A. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 260—267.
null Carr, M. & Jessup, D. Gender difference in first-grade mathematics strategy use, social and meta cognitive influences Journal of Educational Psychology 1997 89 2 318 328 Carr, M. & Jessup, D. (1997). Gender difference in first-grade mathematics strategy use, social and meta cognitive influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 318—328.
null Fantuzzo, J. W., Bulotsky-Shearer, R., McDermott, P., McWayne, C., Frye, D. & Perlman, S. Investigation of dimensions of social-emotional classroom behavior and school readiness for low-income urban preschool children School Psychology Review 2007 Fantuzzo, J. W., Bulotsky-Shearer, R., McDermott, P., McWayne, C., Frye, D. & Perlman, S. (2007). Investigation of dimensions of social-emotional classroom behavior and school readiness for low-income urban preschool children. School Psychology Review.
null Kagan, S. L., Moore, E. & Bredekamp, S. (1995). Reconsidering children’s early development and learning: Toward common views and vocabulary. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
null Lee, E. The relationship between approaches to learning and academic achievement among kindergarten students:An analysis using early childhood longitudinal study kindergarten students (ECLS-K) Conference of International Journal of Arts & Sciences IJAS. 2012 Lee, E. (2012). The relationship between approaches to learning and academic achievement among kindergarten students:An analysis using early childhood longitudinal study kindergarten students (ECLS-K). Conference of International Journal of Arts & Sciences IJAS..
null Michael W.Eysenck, Mark T. Keane .(2015). Cognitive Psychology: A Student’s Handbook (7th Edition). London: Psychology Press.
null Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
null Shepard, L., Kagan, S. L. & Wurtz, E. (1998).Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
null Siegler, R. S Older and younger adults' strategy choice in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1997 126(1) 71 92 Siegler, R. S. (1997). Older and younger adults' strategy choice in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(1), 71—92.
null Smith, T.W., Colby, S.A Teaching for Deep Learning The Clearing House 2007 80 5 205 209 Smith, T.W., Colby, S.A. (2007). Teaching for Deep Learning. The Clearing House, 80(5), 205—209.
Outlines

/