Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences) >
Comparing and Reference: Basic Function and Path in Codification of Education Law in China
Online published: 2022-04-27
In the codification innovation of education law based on the existing education legal system in China, the basic function and path of codification are the two basic concerns. The basic function in codification of education law is systematization, which has the dual dialectical attributes of goal and premise. The systematization has a formal function and a substantive function. The weight of formal and substantive functions carried by the basic form of education codes in major contemporary countries varies, resulting in differences in the degree of realization of the systematization function in the conceptual spectrum of codification compilation and codification innovation. With comparing and reference of the basic forms of foreign education codes and summarizing the innovative experience of the Civil Code, it helps to further understand the basic function and basic path of codification in education law. To explore the basic path of education law codification, it is expected to aim at realizing the systematization function in codification innovation, condense the basic values, legislative principles, and core elements of the education code logic system by discussing the basic issues of top-level design and underlying logic of education law codification.
Huimin Qin , Jun Wang . Comparing and Reference: Basic Function and Path in Codification of Education Law in China[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022 , 40(5) : 28 -39 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.05.004
1 | 阿图尔?考夫曼, 温弗里德?哈斯默尔. (2013). 当代法哲学和法律理论导论(郑永流译). 北京: 法律出版社. |
2 | 本杰明?卡多佐. (2015). 司法过程的性质(苏力译). 北京: 商务印书馆. |
3 | 陈天昊. (2021). 法国行政法的法典化: 起源、探索与借鉴. 比较法研究, (5), 152- 171. |
4 | 高仰光. (2021). 法典化的历史叙事. 中国法学, (5), 67- 85. |
5 | 刘兆兴. (2008). 比较法视野下的法典编纂与解法典化. 环球法律评论, (1), 48- 56. |
6 | 马克斯?韦伯. (2019). 经济与社会(第二卷)(阎克文译). 上海: 上海人民出版社. |
7 | 秦惠民. (2019). 《学位条例》的“立”“释”“修”—略论我国学位法律制度的历史与发展. 学位与研究生教育, (8), 1- 7. |
8 | 秦惠民, 谷昆鹏. (2016). 对完善我国教育法律体系的思考. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (2), 5- 12. |
9 | 秦惠民, 王俊. (2021). 比较法视野下教育法学定位与学科体系. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (12), 1- 14. |
10 | 石佳友. (2020). 解码法典化: 基于比较法的全景式观察. 比较法研究, (4), 14- 36. |
11 | 穗积陈重. (2014). 法典论(李求轶译). 北京: 商务印书馆. |
12 | 王俊. (2020). 程序与实体之间: 美国公立大学录取纠纷司法审查标准研究. 复旦教育论坛, (4), 29- 35. |
13 | 王俊. (2021). 绩效与问责: 国外公立学校教师法律修订的动向及反思. 中国教育学刊, (12), 79- 84. |
14 | 王利明. (2021). 民法典的体系化功能及其实现. 法商研究, (4), 3- 15. |
15 | 文部科学法令研究会. (2022). 文部科学法令要覧(令和4年版). 東京: ぎょうせい. |
16 | 吴福生. (1994). 一部重要法律的诞生—制定《教师法》的前前后后. 人大工作通讯, (1), 29- 32. |
17 | 薛军. (2003). 蒂堡对萨维尼的论战及其历史遗产—围绕《德国民法典》编纂而展开的学术论战述评. 清华法学, (2), 103- 134. |
18 | 约翰?亨利?梅利曼, 罗格里奥?佩雷斯?佩尔多莫. (2021). 大陆法系(顾培东, 吴荻枫译). 北京: 法律出版社. |
19 | 湛中乐. (2021). 论教育法典的地位与形态. 东方法学, (6), 111- 122. |
20 | 교학사 편집부. (2021). 교육법전 세트. 서울시: 교학사. |
21 | 법제처. (2021). 교육법전. 파주시: 국가법령정보센터. |
22 | Bentham, J. (1830). Constitutional Code: For the Use of All Nations and All Government Professing Liberal Opinions (Vol. 1). Strand: Robert Heward. |
23 | Braibant, G. (1996). Utilité et difficultés de la codification. Droits, (24), 61- 72. |
24 | Fauvarque-Cosson, B. (2000). Modern developments in French codification. Edinburgh Law Review, (3), 350- 358. |
25 | Garner, B. A. (2019). Black’s Law Dictionary (11th edition). St. Paul: West Publishing. |
26 | Garoupa, N., & Morriss, A. P. (2012). The fable of the codes: The efficiency of the common law, legal origins, and codification movements. University of Illinois Law Review, (5), 1143- 1198. |
27 | Jones, E. N. (2011). School daze: proposal for education code reform in California. Southwestern Law Review, (3), 425- 448. |
28 | Kozyrin, A. N., & Tatyana, T. (2017). The law on education of 2012 and development of educational law in Russia. Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, (1), 80- 91. |
29 | Lamouroux, S. (2001). La codification ou la démocratisation du droit. Revue Fran? aise de Droit Constitutionnel, (4), 801- 824. |
30 | Linares, P. A. (1997). Senate Bill 1: An Analysis on the Development and Adoption of the New Texas Education Code (Publication No. 9822656) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. |
31 | Marillia, F. , Debène, M. , & Gaudemont, C. D. (2021). Code de l’Éducation : Annoté et Commenté (15e édition) . Paris: Dalloz. |
32 | Masferrer, A. (2019). French codification and codiphobia in common law traditions. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum, (34), 1- 32. |
33 | Morriss, A. P. (1999). Codification and right answers. Chicago-Kent Law Review, (2), 355- 392. |
34 | Murillo, M. L. (2001). The Evolution of codification in the civil law legal systems: Towards decodification and recodification. Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, (1), 163- 182. |
35 | Painter, D. L., & Johnson, R. H. (1970). The Wyoming Education Code of 1969. Land & Water Law Review, (5), 531- 577. |
36 | Postema, G. J. (2019). Bentham and the Common Law Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
37 | Richert, P. (2003). Rapport N° 140, Sénat session ordinaire de 2002—2003. Retrieved October 25, 2021, from https://www.senat.fr/rap/l02-140/l02-140_mono.html. |
38 | Shobe, J. (2020). Codification and the hidden work of congress. UCLA Law Review, (3), 640- 699. |
39 | Stevenson, D. (2014). Costs of codification. University of Illinois Law Review, (4), 1129- 1174. |
40 | Wagner, W. J. (1953). Codification of law in Europe and the codification movement in the middle of the nineteenth century in the United States. Saint Louis University Law Journal, (4), 335- 359. |
41 | Weiss, G. A. (2000). The enchantment of codification in the common-law world. Yale Journal of International Law, (2), 435- 532. |
[42] | Бекетов, О. И., Соловей, Ю. П., & Куликова, Т. Б. (2017). Кодекс РФ об образовании как основа административно-правового регулирования образовательной деятельности. Информация об издании, (12), 4- 19. |
[43] | Буслов, Е. В., Кудрявцев, Ю. А., & Сырых, В. М. (2001). Кодекс Российской Федерации об образовании-стратегический путь совершенствования образовательного законодательства в Российской Федерации. Право и образование, (4), 24- 47. |
[44] | Редакция. (2010). ?Образовательный кодекс России? прошел первое обсуждение. Аккредитация в Образовании, (40), 8- 13. |
[45] | Федеральный центр образовательного законодательства. (2003). Отчет Центра образовательного законодательства о работе над проектом Общей части Кодекса РФ об образовании в 2003г. Retrieved October 20, 2021, from https://fcoz.ru/praktika/kodifikatsiya-zakonodatelstva-ob-obrazovanii/-otchet-tsentra-obrazovatelnogo-zakonodatelstva-o-rabote-nad-proektom-obshchey-chasti-kodeksa-rf-ob-.php. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |