中国人文社会科学核心期刊
中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊
中文核心期刊
导航切换
Home
About Journal
About Journal
Organizational
Awards
Editorial Board
Editorial Team
Submit Review
Guide for Authors
Online Submission
Office Work
Peer Review
Editor-in-chief
Reader Center
Current Issue
Topics
Top Cited
Top Read
Top Downloaded
Volumn Content
Subject Content
Archive
Subscribe
E-mail Alert
Download
Contacts Us
中文
Content of Enrollment education and examination system reform(教育招生与考试制度改革) in our journal
Published in last 1 year
|
In last 2 years
|
In last 3 years
|
All
Please wait a minute...
For Selected:
Download Citations
EndNote
Reference Manager
ProCite
BibTeX
RefWorks
Toggle Thumbnails
Select
Evaluation of Examination in Math in College Entrance Examination:A Empirical Comparative Study on CTT and IRT
1、YAN Chenghai,2、DU Wenjiu,2、SONG Naiqing,3、ZHANG Jian
Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa 2014, 32 (
3
): 10-18.
Abstract
(
761
)
HTML
(
138
)
PDF
(894KB)(
2314
)
Knowledge map
The previous research shows that ITR has more merits than CTT in the evaluation of examination. Based on the data collected in math subject in National College Entrance Examination of one district, the paper compares the differences between CTT and IRT on project parameters, ways of evaluation and accuracy assessment. The research shows that the characteristics of each project properties are more easily reflected under the IRT parameters, and the IRT parameters are more accurate than the CTT. The function of the project information can reflect the information of the tests better. IRT and CTT have different evaluation ways and the scores under the evaluation of IRT, which represents students' abilities, are higher than those of CTT. CTT is different from IRT in precision estimation, but the test information function and confidence interval of IRT are more accurate than that of CTT. The Empirical study shows the advantages of IRT in evaluating the math subject in College Entrance Examination, which is valuable and has potential applications.
Related Articles
|
Metrics
Select
On Metaevaluation System of College Entrance Examination Standard in China
ZHANG Yuan-Zeng
Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa 2014, 32 (
3
): 19-25.
Abstract
(
698
)
HTML
(
43
)
PDF
(440KB)(
1254
)
Knowledge map
College entrance examination standard is the unity of concrete value, value activity strategy and value activity methods. The Metacriterion system of the China's college enrollment standard consists of maintaining stability, development status and development ability, inclusiveness, accessibility and scientific princinple . Based on the measurement model that are established with these five criteria, this paper establishes public policy quality index of national college entrance examination standard. The public policy integrates quality index of national college entrance examination standard system. These indices can provide an objective evidence for developing, improving, perfecting and constructing the current college entrance examination enrollment standard system in China.
Related Articles
|
Metrics
Select
Policy Analysis on Reform of Senior High SchoolEntrance Examination in China
SHEN Yu-Shun
Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa 2014, 32 (
3
): 26-30.
Abstract
(
788
)
HTML
(
47
)
PDF
(399KB)(
1268
)
Knowledge map
The reform policy of senior high school entrance examination concerns national educational goals, human resource development, student choice and educational equality. The core goals of reform lie in how to deal with the relationship between educational quality, efficiency and equality. This paper discusses reform issues in senior high school entrance examination from the perspective of educational evaluation. The author proposes the qualityefficiency oriented entrance examination system which integrates the senior high school entrance examination and the junior high school graduation examination, combining student achievement assessment, scholastic assessment test and occupation adaptability test. In so doing, it will promote student choice opportunity and educational equality in the educational process.
Related Articles
|
Metrics