Fundamental Issues in Educational Assessment

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.04.001

Abstract

Abstract:

This article discusses a number of challenging issues in educational assessment, including multiplicity and incompatibility of educational outcomes, the desire and need to assess all outcomes, and personalization of educational outcomes. These are issues that educational assessment must deal with properly. Thus, the article argues that the future of educational assessment should focus more on long-term educational outcomes and reduce attention on short-term instructional outcomes. It should also focus on personalizing educational assessment so as to help individuals discover and develop their unique strengths and passions.

Key words: educational assessment, educational and instructional outcomes, personalization of education, cognitive and non-cognitive skills, social and emotional skills

Yong Zhao. Fundamental Issues in Educational Assessment[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(4): 1-14.

Figures/Tables 4

References 0

	Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2010). A curriculum for all young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Information_Sheet_A_curriculum_for_all_young_Australians.pdf
	Baker, K. (2007). Are International Tests Worth Anything?. Phi Delta Kappan, 89 (2), 101- 104. doi: 10.1177/003172170708900205
	Bettinger, E. P., Evans, B. J., & Pope, D. G. (2011). Improving College Performance And Retention The Easy Way: Unpacking The Act Exam. Retrieved from Cambridge, MA: http://www.nber.org/papers/w17119.pdf
	Bitler, M., Corcoran, S., Domina, T., & Penner, E. (2019). Teacher Effects On Student Achievement And Height: A Cautionary Tale. Retrieved from Cambridge, MA: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26480/w26480.pdf
	Bonawitza, E., Shaftob, P., Gweonc, H., Goodmand, N. D., Spelkee, E., & Schulzc, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120 (3), 322- 330. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001
	Brunello, G., & Schlotter, M. (2010). The Effect of Non Cognitive Skills and Personality Traits on Labour Market Outcomes. Retrieved from Munich: http://www.epis.pt/downloads/dest_15_10_2010.pdf
	Buchsbauma, D., Gopnika, A., Griffithsa, T. L., & Shaftob, P. (2011). Children’s imitation of causal action sequences is influenced by statistical and pedagogical evidence. Cognition, 120 (3), 331- 340. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.001
	Dean Jr, D., & Kuhn, D. (2007). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education, 91 (3), 384- 397.
	Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes. Educational Researcher, 44 (4), 237- 251. doi: 10.3102/0013189X15584327
	Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82 (1), 405- 432. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
	Emler, T. E., Zhao, Y., Deng, J., Yin, D., & Wang, Y. (2019). Side Effects of Large-Scale Assessments in Education. ECNU Review of Education, 2 (3), 279- 296. doi: 10.1177/2096531119878964
	FairTest. (2018). University Admissions Test Takers 1986—2018. Retrieved from http://fairtest.org/sites/default/files/ACT-SAT-Annual-Test-Takers-Chart_0.pdf
	Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind : the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
	Geiser, S., & Studley, R. (2001). UC and the SAT: Predictive Validity and Differential Impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/~rag/ed351B/sat_study.pdf
	Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
	Hart, S. C., DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P.-W., & Cheng, W. (2020). Nothing lost, something gained? Impact of a universal social-emotional learning program on future state test performance. Educational Researcher, 49 (1), 5- 19. doi: 10.3102/0013189X19898721
	Hiss, W. C., & Franks, V. W. (2014). Defining Promise: Optional Standardized Testing Policies in American College and University Admissions. Retrieved from Arlington VA: http://www.nacacnet.org/research/research-data/nacac-research/Documents/DefiningPromise.pdf
	John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (2008). Handbook of personality : theory and research (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
	Kapur, M. (2016). Examining Productive Failure, Productive Success, Unproductive Failure, and Unproductive Success in Learning. Educational Psychologist, 51 (2), 289- 299. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457
	Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15 (10), 661- 667. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x
	Kobrin, J. L., Patterson, B. F., Shaw, E. J., Mattern, K. D., & Barbuti, S. M. (2008). Validity of the SAT® for Predicting First-Year College Grade Point Average. Retrieved from New York: http://research.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/publications/2012/7/researchreport-2008-5-validity-sat-predicting-first-year-college-grade-point-average.pdf
	Levin, H. M. (2012). More Than Just Test Scores. Prospects: The Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 42 (3), 269- 284. doi: 10.1007/s11125-012-9240-z
	Lewontin, R. (2001). The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
	Loveless, T. (2006). How Well Are American Students Learning? Retrieved from Washington DC: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2006/10education_loveless/10education_loveless.pdf
	Mastery Transcript Consortium. (2020a). Key Features of the MTC Mastery Transcript®. Mastery Transcript Consortium. Retrieved from https://mastery.org/what-we-do/mastery-transcript/
	Mastery Transcript Consortium. (2020b). Mastery Transcript Consortium. Mastery Transcript Consortium. Retrieved from https://mastery.org/
	McGaw, B., Louden, W., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2020). NAPLAN Review: Final Report. Retrieved from https://naplanreview.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/1222159/2020_NAPLAN_review_final_report.pdf
	OECD Better Life Initiative. (2017). How’s Life? 2017: Measuring Well-being. Retrieved from Paris: http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/economics/how-s-life-2017_how_life-2017-en-.WiFqrrQ-fOQ#page1
	Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/frameworkflyer_072307.pdf
	Peterson, P. L. (1979). Direct Instruction: Effective for What and for Whom. Educational Leadership, 37 (1), 46- 48.
	Reiss, S. (2000). Who am I? : the 16 basic desires that motivate our behavior and define our personality. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.
	Reiss, S. (2004). Multifaceted Nature of Intrinsic Motivation: The Theory of 16 Basic Desires. Review of General Psychology, 8(3), 179-183. Retrieved from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/cognition.and.environment/files/reiss-intrinsic-mot.pdf
	Ridley, M. (2003). Nature via nurture : genes, experience, and what makes us human (1st ed.). New York, N.Y.: HarperCollins.
	Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind : a new theory of human intelligence. New York, NY: Viking.
	The European Parliament, & The Council of the European Union. (2006, December 12, 2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament And of the Council of the European Union on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_394/l_39420061230en00100018.pdf
	Tienken, C. H. (2008). Rankings of International Achievement Test Performance and Economic Strength: Correlation or Conjecture? International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 3(4), 1−15. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/ijepl/index.php/ijepl/article/view/110/44
	UNICEF. (2020, August 24). ‘What will a return to school during the COVID-19 pandemic look like?’. UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/coronavirus/what-will-return-school-during-covid-19-pandemic-look
	Wigelsworth, M., Lendrum, A., Oldfield, J., Scott, A., ten Bokkel, I., Tate, K., & Emery, C. (2016). The impact of trial stage, developer involvement and international transferability on universal social and emotional learning programme outcomes: a meta-analysis. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46 (3), 347- 376. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2016.1195791
	Zhao, Y. (2012). World Class Learners: Educating Creative and Entrepreneurial Students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
	Zhao, Y. (2016a). Counting what counts : reframing education outcomes. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
	Zhao, Y. (2016b). Numbers Can Lie: The Meaning and Limitations of Test Scores. In Y. Zhao (Ed.), Counting What Counts: Reframing Education Outcomes (pp. 13−30). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
	Zhao, Y. (2018a). Personalizable Education for Greatness. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 54 (3), 109- 115. doi: 10.1080/00228958.2018.1481645
	Zhao, Y. (2018b). Reach for Greatness: Personalizable Education for All Children. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
	Zhao, Y. (2018c). The Rise of the Useless: the Case for Talent Diversity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1- 7. doi: 10.1007/s10956-018-9743-3
	Zhao, Y. (2018d). What Works May Hurt: Side Effects in Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
	Zhao, Y. (2020). Another education war? The coming debates over social and emotional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 101 (8), 42- 48. doi: 10.1177/0031721720923791

	等级	相关
信心	4	?0.58
	8	?0.64
	4	?0.67
享受课程	8	?0.75

国家地区	数学分数	信心（%）	看重数学（%）
韩国	613	3	14
新加坡	611	14	43
中国台湾	609	7	13
中国香港	586	7	26
日本	570	2	13
美国	509	24	51
英国	507	16	48
澳大利亚	505	17	46

	PISA阅读	PISA数学	PISA科学
感知能力（Perceived Capabilities）	?0.595^**	?0.586^**	?0.608^**
新生创业率（Nascent Entre Rate）	?0.693^**	?0.636^**	?0.678^**
新企业拥有率（New Biz Ownsp Rate）	?0.371^*	?0.374^*	?0.392^*
早期创业活动总量（Total Early Stage Entre Activity）	?0.658^**	?0.620^**	?0.658^**