doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2000.04.004

Abstract

秉坤霍, 显华黄. [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2000, 18(4): 21-30.

Figures/Tables 4

References 0

	T. Aspland, Ⅰ. Macpherson, C. Proudford, & L. Whitmore(1996). Critical Collaborative Action Research as A Means ofCuriculum Inquiry and Empowerment. Educational Action Research, 4(1), PP.93-104.
	T. Bottomore(1984). The Frankfunt School. Chichester : Ellis Horwood Itd.
	J. Braaten(1991). Habermas's Critical Theory of Society. New York: State University of New York.
	W. Carr, & S. Kemmis(1986). Becorming Crical : Education, Knowuldege and Action Research. London: Falmer Press.
	w. Carr(1995). For Education : Torards Critical Educational Inquiry. Buckingham: Open University Press.
	J. Elliott(1991). Acion Research for Educational Change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
	Grundy(1982). Three Modes of Action Research. Curriculum Perspectives.2(2), pp.23 - 24.
	S. Grundy(1987). Curiculum : Product or Praxis. London: The Falmer Press.
	J. Habermas(1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity : Twelrve Lectures (F. Lawrence, Trans.)Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published 1986).
	J. Habermas(1972). Knouldege and Hunan Interests(J. J. Shapiro, Trans). London: Heinemann. (original uwork pub-lished 1968).
	D. C. Hoy(1978). The Critical Circle : Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of Cal-iformia Press.
	R. Keat(1981). The Politics of Social Theory : Habermas, Freud, and the Critique of Positiaism. Oxford: Blackwell.
	S. Kemmis, & R. McTaggart(1988). The Action Research planner(3n ed.). Victoria: Deakin University.
	W.S.Li, T.S.lam, W. M. Yu, & P.K. Fok(1998a). The End of Action Reseurch? The Case for Hong Kong. Paper pre-sented at the Intemnational Teacher Education Conference 1998(ITEC 98)in the Fast China Normnal University, Shanghai, China, Apil 26 - 30.
	J. B. MacDonald(1975). Curriculum and Human Interests. In W Pinar(ed.), Curiculum Theorizing : The Reconceptualists. Berkeley : McCutchan Pubishing Corporation.
	C.J. Marsh(1997). Key Concepts for Understanding Curiculumn : Volune 1. Loudon: The Falmer Press.
	T. McCarthy(1978). The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge, Massachuet: MIT Press.
	J. McKernan(1987). Action Research and Curiculum Development. Peabody Jounal of Education, 64(2), pp.6- 19.
	J. McKernan(1989). Varieties of Curiculum Action Research: Constraints and Typologies in Anglo-Inish and American Projects. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA March 27-31, 1989.
	J. Mckernan(1991). Action Inquiry : Sudied Enactment. In E. C. Short(ed.), Forms of Curiculuom Inquiry(pp.309 -326). New York: State Unvrsity of New York Press.
	J. Mckernan(1996). Curiculum Action Research : A Handbook of Mehods and Resoures for the Refletive Pratitioner(2md ed.). London: Kogan Page.
	J. McNiff(1988). Action Research : Principles and Practice. London: Macnillan.
	R. McTaggart, & M. Carbutcheon Singh(1986). New Directiuns in Action Research. Gurriculum Perspectires, 6(2).42- 46.
	S. E. Noffke, & M. Brennan(1991). Sudent Teachers Use Action Research: Issues and Examples. In B. R. Tabachnick, & K.M.Zeichner(eds.), lssues and Practices in Inquiry-0riened Teacher Education(pp. 186 - 201). London: The FalmerPress.
	P. Ricoeur(1991). From Text to Action: Essays in Herneneutics Ⅱ. UK : Athlone Press.
	G. Ritzer(1996). Classical Sociological Theory(2^nd ed.). New York: The McGraw Hill International Editions.
	W. H. Schubert(1986). Curriculum : Perspective, Paradigm, and Pssibility. New York: Macmillan.
	J. Schwab(1969).The practical: A language for Curiculum. School Review, 78, pp.1-23.
	J. Schwab(1971). The Practical: Arts of Eelectie.School Rerierv, 79(4), pp.493 - 542.
	J. Schwab(1973). The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum. School Rerier, 81(4), pp. 501-522.
	J. Schwab(1983). The Practical 4: Somehing for Cumiculum Profesors to Do. Curiculum Inquiry, 13(3), pp.239-265.
	L. Stenhouse(1975). An Introduction to Curiculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
	J. B.Thompson, D. Held, (ed.)(1982). Habermas, Critical Debates. London: Macmillan.
	D. H. Tripp(1987). Action Research and Pofessional Development. ln P. Hughes, (ed.), Better Teachers for Better Schools. Melbourme: Australian College of Education.
	A. Wellmer (1985). Reason, Utopia, and the Dialectic of Enlightenment. In R. J. Bermstein, (ed.), Habermas and Modermity(pp.35 - 66). Masachusels: The MIT Press.
	O.Zuber-Skerritt(1996a). Introduction: New Directions in Action Rescarch. In O. Zuber Skeritt, (ed.), New Drections in Action Research(pp.3 - 9)London: The Falmer Press.
	O.Zuber-Skerritt(1996b). Enancipatory Action Ressearch for Organisational Change and Managenent Development.In O.Zuber Skenitt, (ed.), New Directions in Action Research (pp.83-105).London: The Falmer Press.
	余灵灵: 《哈伯玛斯传》, 河北人民出版社, 1998.
	李子建: 《环境教育的取向: 课程范式之观点》, 《初等教育学报》1993年第1期.
	李子建: 《从批判角度剖析课程定义》, 《教育学报》1996年第1期.
	李子建、黄显华: 《课程: 范式、取向和设计》(第二版), 香港中文大学出版社, 1996年.
	李英明: 《哈伯马斯》, 台北东大图书公司, 1986年.
	周华山: 《试论当代社会学理论》, 李明堑(编)《社会学新论》香港: 商务印书馆, 1992年.
	金耀基: 《范典与社会学之发展》, 李明堑(编)《社会学新论》香港: 商务印书馆, 1992年.
	高宣扬: 《哈伯玛斯论》, 台北远流出版公司, 1991年.
	高慎英: 《教师成为研究: "教师专业化"问题探讨》, 《教育理论与实践》1998年第3期.
	郭官义、李黎: 《译者前言》, 哈伯玛斯著.《认识与兴趣》上海学林出版社, 1999年.
	陈向明: 《甚么是行动研究》, 《教育研究与实验》1999年第2期.
	陈伯璋: 《课程研究与教育革新》, 台北师大书苑, 1987年.
	陈美如: 《跃登教师研究的舞台: 教师课程行动研究初探》, 《人文及社会学会科教学通讯》1996年第1期.
	陈惠邦: 《教育行动研究》, 台北师大书苑, 1998年.
	曾庆豹: 《当代西方著名哲学家评传: 社会哲学》, 山东人民出版社, 1996年.
	黄政杰: 《课程改革》(二版), 台北汉文, 1992年.
	黄瑞祺: 《批判社会学: 批判理论与现代社会学》, 台北三民书局, 1996年.
	杨深坑: 《教育知识的国际化或本土化?一兼论台湾近年来的教育研究》.《教育学报》1996年第1期.
	欧力同: 《哈贝马斯的批判理论》重庆出版社, 1997年.
	欧用生: 《教师专业成长》, 台北师大书苑有限公司, 1996年.
	蔡清田: (行动研究理论与"教师即研究者"取向的课程发展》, 载台东师院国民教育研究所(编)《行动研究国际学术研讨会论文集》, 1998年.

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 0

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments