Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences) >
Transforming Educational Thought into Educational Theory: A Historical Investigation Centered on the Study of XueJi
Accepted date: 2022-07-04
Online published: 2022-12-03
The view that educational ideology is educational theory is inspired by Feng Qi’s thought of “two aspects”. There is an internal connection between educational thought and educational theory, which is a systematic educational thought. XueJibecame a “transit station” for modern Chinese scholars to understand and accept western educational theories, because it has the theoretical potential to be transformed. The process of transforming XueJi into a necessary book of normal education and even a monograph of education is the process in which the educational thoughts of XueJi are brought into the domain of pedagogy. Our reflection on transforming the educational thought of XueJi into educational theory is a double academic consciousness based on the construction of Chinese educational discourse system. It not only requires the educational historian to sincerely review the “Chinese language expressed in the West” to study the educational thought of XueJi with the pedagogical framework, but also requires the educational historian to form the self-consciousness leading the educational discourse system of China. The academic work of the educational thought of XueJi is to realize the docking between ancient educational texts and contemporary contexts, to communicate the ancient and modern educational traditions of China, and to explore an academic path based on the traditional lifeline for Chinese pedagogy.
Jie Sun . Transforming Educational Thought into Educational Theory: A Historical Investigation Centered on the Study of XueJi[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022 , 40(12) : 103 -109 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.12.009
null | 车树实. (1962). 《学记》简介. 人民教育, (9), 39- 40+24. |
null | 冯建军. (2015). 构建教育学的中国话语体系. 高等教育研究, (8), 1- 8. |
null | 傅任敢. (1957). 《学记》译述. 上海: 上海人民出版社. |
null | 顾明远. (1990). 教育大辞典(第1卷). 上海: 上海教育出版社. |
null | 顾树森. (1957). 《学记》今译. 北京: 人民教育出版社. |
null | 顾岳中. (1962). 《学记》是教育学的鼻祖. 文汇报, 1962−7−1(3). |
null | 彭漪涟. (2008). 化理论为方法 化理论为德性: 对冯契一个哲学命题的思考与探索. 上海: 上海人民出版社. |
null | 孙培青. (2009). 中国教育史(第三版). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社. |
null | 唐莹. (2002). 元教育学. 北京: 人民教育出版社. |
null | 王炳照, 等. (2008). 简明中国教育史(第四版). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社. |
null | 王策三. (2005). 教学论稿(第二版). 北京: 人民教育出版社. |
null | 王树楠. (1914). 学记笺证. 陶庐丛刻. |
null | 叶澜, 罗雯瑶, 庞庆举. (2019). 中国传统文化与教育学中国话语体系的建设——叶澜教授专访. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), (3), 83- 91. |
null | 叶澜. (2004). 中国教育学发展世纪问题的审视. 教育研究, (7), 3- 17. |
null | 叶澜. (2015). 回归突破: “生命·实践”教育学论纲. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社. |
null | 张斌贤, 褚洪启, 等. (1994). 西方教育思想史. 成都: 四川教育出版社. |
null | 张斌贤. (2016). 探寻教育史学科重建的出发点. 北京大学教育评论, (4), 78- 88. |
null | 张瑞璠. (1957). 谈中国教育史的研究. 文汇报, 1957−3−31(2). |
null | 张再林. (2018). 作为身体哲学的中国古代哲学. 北京: 中国书籍出版社. |
null | 周作宇. (2000). 问题之源与方法之境: 元教育理论探索. 北京: 教育科学出版社. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |