Types of Aggressive Victims of Rural Pupils and Their School Adaptation: Based on Latent Profile Analysis

  • Min Wu ,
  • Wenqi Song ,
  • Lichan Liang
Expand
  • 1. School of Education, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China
    2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100871, China

Accepted date: 2022-09-02

  Online published: 2022-12-29

Abstract

The current study investigated whether there were distinct subgroups of rural children who experienced different forms of aggression and victimization using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), and whether these subgroups differed from one another in their different levels of school adaptation. Participants were children in grades 4-6 from rural central primary schools. It showed that, first, four subgroups were identified, including “high aggression-victimization subgroup” “high victimization subgroup” “medium aggression-victimization subgroup” and “low involvement subgroup”. Second, there was high degree of co-occurrence among four subgroups of aggression and victimization. Except the “high aggression-victimization subgroup”, all subgroups showed that indirect aggression was higher than direct aggression, and indirect victimization was higher than direct victimization. Third, there were significant differences in gender, grade and boarding status among different subgroups. Boys, lower grade and boarding students were more likely to be involved in school victimization. Fourth, in terms of school adaption, the scores of positive and negative emotions in “high aggression-victimization subgroup” were significantly higher than those in other subgroups. However, the scores of interpersonal relationship and academic achievement of “low involvement subgroup” were significantly better than those of other subgroups. Therefore, we should pay more attention to rural schools, pay attention to rural primary school students who are in “high aggression-victimization subgroup”, and carry out targeted intervention and prevention according to the characteristics of different subgroups and students' adaptation.

Cite this article

Min Wu , Wenqi Song , Lichan Liang . Types of Aggressive Victims of Rural Pupils and Their School Adaptation: Based on Latent Profile Analysis[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023 , 41(1) : 40 -49 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.01.004

References

null 董奇, 林崇德. (2011). 中国6—15岁儿童青少年心理发育关键指标与测评. 北京: 科学出版社.
null 高屾, 闵文斌, 常芳, 史耀疆. (2018). 农村初中生校园欺凌与心理健康的相关性研究. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 36 (2), 60- 67+155.
null 郭伯良, 张雷. (2003). 近20年儿童亲社会与同伴关系相关研究结果的元分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 11 (02), 86- 88+85.
null 何妍, 袁柯曼, 张明明, 边玉芳. (2023). 父母控制亚型及其对青少年适应的影响. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 41 (1), 25- 39.
null 胡义秋, 方晓义, 刘双金, 黎志华, 朱翠英, 孙焕良等. (2018). 农村留守儿童焦虑情绪的异质性: 基于潜在剖面分析. 心理发展与教育, 34 (3), 346- 352.
null 黄晓婷, 吴方文, 宋映泉. (2017). 农村寄宿制学校同伴侵害对内化行为的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 35 (1), 93- 101+124.
null 纪林芹, 高敏, 张良, 潘斌, 张文新. (2020). 青少年早期身体攻击与关系攻击的异质性共发模式、稳定性及其与同伴关系的联系. 心理科学, (5), 1095- 1102.
null 江光荣. (2004). 中小学班级环境: 结构与测量. 心理科学, 27 (4), 839- 843.
null 李亚真, 桑标. (2017). 不同攻击/受欺凌类别儿童的冷热心理理论能力特点. 心理研究, 10 (2), 16- 21.
null 刘丹, 缴润凯, 王贺立, 李飞飞. (2018). 幼儿教师情绪劳动策略与职业倦怠的关系: 基于潜在剖面分析. 心理发展与教育, 34 (6), 104- 111.
null 刘俊升, 周颖, 顾文瑜. (2009). Buss-perry攻击性量表在青少年中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17 (4), 449- 451.
null 刘宇平, 周冰涛, 杨波. (2022). 情绪如何引发暴力犯的攻击?基于情绪调节理论的解释. 心理学报, 54 (3), 270- 280.
null 陆伟, 宋映泉, 梁净. (2017). 农村寄宿制学校中的校园霸凌研究. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 263 (5), 5- 17.
null 邱皓政. (2008). 潜在类别模型的原理与技术. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
null 苏斌原, 张洁婷, 喻承甫, 张卫. (2015). 大学生心理行为问题的识别: 基于潜在剖面分析. 心理发展与教育, 31 (3), 96- 105.
null 温忠麟, 谢晋艳, 王惠惠. (2023). 潜在类别模型的原理、步骤及程序. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 41 (1), 1- 15.
null 吴要武, 侯海波. (2017). 校园欺负的影响与对策——来自农村寄宿制小学的证据. 劳动经济研究, 5 (6), 36- 55.
null 谢家树, 魏宇民, ZHU Zhuorong. (2019). 当代中国青少年校园欺负受害模式探索: 基于潜在剖面分析. 心理发展与教育, 35 (1), 98- 105.
null 熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20 (5), 757- 769.
null 杨兆山, 高鹏. (2012). 农村寄宿制学校低龄学生的适应问题与对策——基于中西部三省区的调查. 现代教育管理, (7), 37- 41.
null 张文新, 陈亮, 纪林芹, 张玲玲, 陈光辉, 王姝琼. (2009). 童年中期身体侵害、关系侵害与儿童的情绪适应. 心理学报, 41 (5), 433- 443.
null 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 145 (6), 942- 950.
null 周宗奎, 蔡春凤, 赵冬梅. (2006). 不同攻击/受欺负类别儿童的同伴交往自我知觉. 心理发展与教育, 22(2), 23-28.
null Antoniadou, N., Kokkinos, C. M., & Fanti, K. A. (2019). Traditional and cyber bullying/victimization among adolescents: examining their psychosocial profile through latent profile analysis. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1 (2), 85- 98.
null Chester, D. S., DeWall, C. N., & Enjaian, B. (2019). Sadism and aggressive behavior: Inflicting pain to feel pleasure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45 (8), 1252- 1268.
null Clark, K. N., Dorio, N. B., Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K. (2020). Understanding Bullying, Victimization, and Bystander Behaviors Through Resource Control Theory. Child & Youth Care Forum, 49 (4), 489- 510.
null Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66 (3), 710- 722.
null Eadeh, F. R., Peak, S. A., & Lambert, A. J. (2017). The bittersweet taste of revenge: On the negative and positive consequences of retaliation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 27- 39.
null Farrington, D. P., Gaffney, H., Losel, F. A., & Ttofi, M. M. (2016). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of developmental prevention programs in reducing delinquency, aggression, and bullying. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 33, 91- 106.
null Foti, R. J., Bray, B. C., Thompson, N. J., & Allgood, S. F. (2012). Know thy self, know thy leader: Contributions of a pattern-oriented approach to examining leader perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 23 (4), 702- 717.
null Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19 (1), 97- 132.
null Hayes, N. L., Marsee, M. A., & Russell, D. W. (2020). Latent profile analysis of traditional and cyber-aggression and victimization: associations with dark triad traits and psychopathology symptoms. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 43 (2), 399- 412.
null Heilbron, N., & Prinstein, M. J. (2008). A review and reconceptualization of social aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive correlates. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11 (4), 176- 217.
null Kokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., & Markos, A. (2014). Cyber-bullying: An investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 204- 214.
null Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A., Guerra, N., & Runions, K. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55 (5), 602- 611.
null Nansel, T. R., Craig, W., Overpeck, M. D., Saluja, G., Ruan, W. J., et al. (2004). Cross national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158, 730- 736.
null Nylund, K., Bellmore, A., & Graham, N. S. (2007). Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: what does latent class analysis say?. Child Development, 78 (6), 1706- 1722.
null Olivier, E., Morin, A., Vitaro, F., & Galand, B. (2021). Challenging the ‘‘‘mean kid’’’ perception: boys’ and girls’ profiles of peer victimization and aggression from 4th to 10th grades. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5-6), 0886260521997949.
null Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24 (6), 807- 814.
null Pfeiffer, J. P., & Pinquart, M. (2014). Bullying in German boarding schools: A pilot study. School Psychology International, 35 (6), 580- 591.
null Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Rens, V., & Aleva, L. (2013). Developmental trajectories of bullying and social dominance in youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37 (4), 224- 234.
null Rindskopf, D. (2003). Mixture or homogeneous? Comment on Bauer and Curran. Psychological Methods, 8 (3), 364- 368.
null Rutter, M., & Sroufe, L. A. (2000). Developmental psychopathology: concepts and challenges. Development and Psychopathology, 12 (3), 265- 296.
null Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28 (1), 30- 39.
null Savahl, S., Montserrat, C., Casas, F., Adams, S., Tiliouine, H., Benninger, E., & Jackson, K. (2019). Childrens experiences of bullying victimization and the influence on their subjective well-being. Child Development, 90 (2), 414- 431.
null Slotter, E. B., Finkel, E. J., Dewall, C. N., Pond, R. S., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Putting the brakes on aggression toward a romantic partner: the inhibitory influence of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 (2), 291- 305.
null Solberg, M. E., Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. M. (2007). Bullies and victims at school: Are they the same pupils?. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77 (2), 441- 464.
null Sterzing, P. R., Auslander, W. F., Ratliff, G. A., Gerke, D. R., Edmond, T., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2020). Exploring Bullying Perpetration and Victimization Among Adolescent Girls in the Child Welfare System: Bully-Only, Victim-Only, Bully-Victim, and Noninvolved Roles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35 (5-6), 1311- 1333.
null Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18 (4), 450- 469.
null Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063- 1070.
null Wettstein, A., Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Guimond, F. A., Forget‐Dubois, N., Cantin, S., . . . & Boivin, M. (2013). The additive and interactive roles of aggression, prosocial behavior, and social preference in predicting resource control in young children. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 5(3), 1759?6599.
Outlines

/