Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences) >
What Are Discipline Practices: Based on the Perspective of Ontology
Accepted date: 2024-06-27
Online published: 2024-11-22
Discipline practices are the result of the specialization of the activities of understanding and reforming the world. As a new paradigm of talent cultivation in the era of core competencies, original connotations of disciplinary practices have three dimensions: behavior, cognition and reflection. In the behavioral dimension, discipline practice points to the empirical investigation, which begins with the presentation of real questions based on the real world, with objective facts as the object of experience, with hands-on operations as the basic method, with the direct aim of obtaining first-hand empirical data, and with the basic tenet of service theory construction and engineering design. In the thinking dimension, discipline practice from sciences points to the construction of theoretical thinking aimed at revealing and representing the world as it really is, and its engineering level points to the construction of engineering thinking aimed at designing of transforming the world. In the reflective dimension, discipline practice points to the practice consciousness of the practitioner, who takes his own practice behavior and thought as the object to reflect on himself, improve himself, and motivate himself. It is the organic unity of self-clarity of determining self-practice state, self-criticism of improving self-practice quality, and self-encouragement of motivating self-practice forward.
Daoyu Yang . What Are Discipline Practices: Based on the Perspective of Ontology[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024 , 42(12) : 73 -81 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.12.003
null | 安克斯密特. (2011). 崇高的历史经验(杨军译). 上海: 东方出版中心. |
null | 伯克利. (2020). 动机心理学(郭书彩译). 北京: 人民邮电出版社. |
null | 崔允漷, 张紫红, 郭洪瑞. (2021). 溯源与解读: 学科实践即学习方式变革的新方向. 教育研究, 42 (12), 55- 63. |
null | 德维特. (2013). 实在论与真理(郝苑译). 北京: 科学出版社. |
null | 德威特. (2021). 世界观: 现代人必须要懂的科学哲学与科学史(孙天译). 北京: 机械工业出版社. |
null | 邓晓芒. (2008). 哲学史方法论十四讲. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社. |
null | 冯友兰. (2017). 新原人. 北京: 生活?读书?新知三联书店. |
null | 胡塞尔. (2017). 纯粹现象学通论: 纯粹现象学和现象学哲学的观念(李幼蒸译). 北京: 商务印书馆. |
null | 李伯聪. (2018). 工程思维的性质和认识史及其对工程教育改革的启示——工程教育哲学笔记之三. 高等工程教育研究, (4), 45- 54. |
null | 石中英. (2019). 穿越教育概念的丛林. 北京: 教育科学出版社. |
null | 梯利, 伍德. (2015). 西方哲学史(葛力译). 北京: 商务印书馆. |
null | 王策三, 裴娣娜, 丛立新. (2002). 教学认识论. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社. |
null | 吴刚平. (2022). 跨学科主题学习的意义与设计思路. 课程?教材?教法, 42 (9), 53- 55. |
null | 徐长福. (2013). 理论思维与工程思维: 两种思维方式的僭越与划界. 重庆: 重庆出版社. |
null | 杨道宇. (2020). 学由志成: 阳明心学的学习意志论. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 43 (3), 99- 104. |
null | 杨道宇. (2022). 论教师的评价品格. 教育科学, 38 (4), 8- 14. |
null | 杨道宇. (2023). 从“科学探究”到“学科实践”的新课标意义. 课程?教材?教法, 43 (9), 50- 57. |
null | 杨国荣. (2011). 道论. 北京: 北京大学出版社. |
null | 扬, 穆勒. (2021). 课程与知识的专门化: 教育社会学研究(许甜译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社. |
null | 叶澜. (2015). 回归突破: “生命?实践”教育学论纲. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社. |
null | 张祥龙. (2011). 现象学导论七讲: 从原著阐发原意. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社. |
null | 赵汀阳. (2017). 第一哲学的支点. 北京: 生活?读书?新知三联书店. |
null | 朱克斯, 沙夫. (2020). 教育未来简史——颠覆性时代的学习之道(钟希声译). 北京: 教育科学出版社. |
null | Aronson, E. et al. (2021). Social Psychology (Tenth Edition). London: Pearson Education. |
null | Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Chicago: D. C. Health & Co. |
null | National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. |
null | OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030 &OECD Learning Compass 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/OECD-Learning-Compass-for-Mathematics-2023-13-Oct.pdf. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |