Crossing the “Valley of Death”: Establishing a High-quality Patent Evaluation System for Universities

  • Suping Wang ,
  • Wei Wang ,
  • Qingwen Wang ,
  • Weiwei Zhang ,
  • Dongliang Li
Expand
  • 1. Office of Academic Planning and Development of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    2. Library of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025 China
    3. China Hospital Development Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025 China
    4. National Center for Translational Medicine (Shanghai), Shanghai 200240, China

Online published: 2025-02-24

Copyright

, 2025, Copyright reserved © 2025.

Abstract

Currently, China is entering a strategic transformation period of high-quality patent development. Higher education institutions play a crucial role in serving the country’s economic and social high-quality development through scientific and technological innovation. A large number of patents in universities are still “dormant” in the ivory tower, falling into the “valley of death” between patent authorization and patent transfer and transformation. How to develop a set of patent evaluation indicators and systems suitable for universities to promote the effective transformation of high-quality patents in universities has become an important path to improve the efficiency of patent quality management in universities. This study used a mixed research method combining literature review, Delphi method, and Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine indicator weights. The results indicate that in the high-quality patent evaluation system constructed, which includes 4 primary indicators and 15 secondary indicators, the weights of the primary indicators from high to low are patent conversion (0.2674), patent management (0.2582), patent creation (0.2435), and patent maintenance (0.2309), respectively. This evaluation system has good scientificity and applicability, and can comprehensively reflect the current level of patents in universities. From the perspective of the full cycle of patents, it should have both “quantitative” and “qualitative” indicators to build a distinctive patent evaluation system adapted to the patents of colleges and universities, so as to help promote the high-quality transformation of patents.

Cite this article

Suping Wang , Wei Wang , Qingwen Wang , Weiwei Zhang , Dongliang Li . Crossing the “Valley of Death”: Establishing a High-quality Patent Evaluation System for Universities[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2025 , 43(3) : 24 -35 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.03.003

References

白晶. (2021). 我国高校专利质量评价研究. 大连: 大连理工大学学位论文.
  编辑部. (2021). 科技部引导科研院所、高校与企业共建新型研发机构、设立联合实验室. 粉末冶金工业, 31 (02), 84+96.
  崔光彩. (2022). 高校专利运营管理体系构建策略. 经济研究导刊, (21), 150- 152.
  丁焕峰, 何小芳, 孙小哲. (2021). 中国城市专利质量评价及时空演进. 经济地理, 41(05).
  冯康. (2020). 基于专利文献的技术生命周期分析——以中国环境治理领域为例. 科技和产业, 20 (11), 54- 58.
  冯劭华, 昝栋, 苏菊. (2021). 改进的高校专利竞争力动态评价方法及应用. 中国高校科技(11), 33-37.
  高雅玉, 李泽霞. (2019). 节水、生态型单坝坝址优选迈实层次分析. 2019中国水资源高效利用与节水技术论坛, 中国安徽合肥.
  国家知识产权局. (2019). 2019年中国专利调查报告. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/module/download/down.jsp?i_ID=40213&colID=88.
  国家知识产权局. (2022a). 2022年中国专利调查报告. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&showname=2022%E5%B9%B4%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E4%B8%93%E5%88%A9%E8%B0%83%E6%9F%A5%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A.pdf&filename=bc6d1655fc8247fcb9ef92e9b27f6ca8.pdf.
  国家知识产权局. (2022b). 分国内外专利授权状况. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/col/col61/index.html#mark.
  国家知识产权局. (2023). 国务院办公厅关于印发《专利转化运用专项行动方案(2023—2025年)》的通知. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2023/10/20/art_3294_188160.html.
  教育部, 国家知识产权局, 科技部. (2020). 关于提升高等学校专利质量促进转化运用的若干意见. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-02/21/content_5481750.htm.
  教育部办公厅, 教育部通报第2期, (2022). 怀进鹏同志在新一轮“双一流”建设 推进会上的讲话(节选). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A01/s7048/202205/t20220525_630371.html.
  赖朝安, 徐翠璐. (2017). 一种基于专利分析的技术成熟度评估算法. 科研管理, 38 (S1), 237- 243.
  李江华. (2019), 校地共建新型研发机构的协同治理研究. 武汉: 华中科技大学学位论文.
  李牧南, 褚雁群, 王流云. (2019). 专利质量的不同维度指标与托宾Q值的关系测度. 科学学研究, 37 (07), 1164- 1173+1202.
  刘立春. (2017). 二元专利质量研究. 情报杂志, 36 (11), 168- 174.
  马天旗. (2018). 高价值专利筛选.北京: 知识产权出版社.
  邵勇. (2003). 专利指标及其经济效益研究. 广州: 暨南大学学位论文.
  王昌军. (2022). “双创”环境下高校图书馆专利挖掘服务模式及优化策略研究. 图书馆工作与研究, (01), 14- 21.
  伍绍青, 桂科, 刘江南. (2019). 支持规避设计的海量专利质量评价模型. 工业工程, 22 (03), 86- 92+109.
  谢炜. (2005). 中国专利产出研究. 成都: 电子科技大学学位论文.
  徐明波, 荀渊. (2021). 高校科技成果转化机构定位、职能及其影响因素研究——基于中美研究型大学科技成果转化机构的对比分析. 高教探索, (11), 34- 42.
  叶建木, 李倩, 谢从珍, 刘轲. (2023). 中国高校“休眠态”科技成果现状、成因与对策研究. 科技与管理, 25 (03), 1- 12.
  张婷, 刘洁. (2023). 基于生存分析法的高校发明专利维持决策影响因素分析. 科技创业月刊, 36 (08), 99- 107.
  赵燕红, 高鹏, 杨文姣, 张冬志. (2023). Delphi和AHP法结合使用构建大型综合医院学科评估指标体系. 甘肃医药, 42 (11), 1033- 1037.
  中国青年网. (2024). 突破400万件, 全球第一有效发明专利数量折射怎样的创新力?. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1790495555924258364&wfr=spider&for=pc.
  Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25 (3), 233- 242.
  Gr?nqvist, C. (2009). The private value of patents by patent characteristics: evidence from Finland [Article; Proceedings Paper]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34 (2), 159- 168.
  Hikkerova, L., Kammoun, N., & Lantz, J. S. (2014). Patent life cycle: New evidence [Article]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 313- 324.
  Merges, R. P. (1988). Commercial success and patent standars-economic perspectives on innovation [Article]. California Law Review, 76 (4), 803- 876.
  Saaty, T. L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes [Article]. European Journal of Operational Research, 168 (2), 557- 570.
Outlines

/