Quantitative research of education as one of the most important paradigm develops very fast in China. However, its quality and reliability are being questioned. In order to figure out how to improve the quality of quantitative research of education, this article explores the classification of disciplines, and defines education as a comprehensive practical discipline. After analyzing the mission of quantitative research of education in the context of the classification of disciplines, the author discusses the problems with quantitative research of education in China and introduces the experience of economics in handling the relevant issue. Finally, the authors put forward some strategies to improve the quality of quantitative research of education.
Du Yuhong
,
Zang Lin
. Classification of Disciplines and Improved Quality of Quantitative Research of Education[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2019
, 37(4)
: 38
-46
.
DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.04.004
杜育红,袁玉芝.(2017). 高等学校资源配置的逻辑与内涵发展. 教育与经济,(3),3-8.
范涌峰,宋乃庆.(2016). 教育研究科学化:限度与突破. 教育研究, (1), 94-101.
萨尔斯伯格.(2004). 女士品茶——20世纪统计怎样变革了科学 (邱东等译). 北京:中国统计出版社.
姚洋.(2006). 经济学的科学主义谬误. 读书, (12), 144-149.
赵洪春.(2013).经济学实证研究路在何方. 经济资料译从,(2), 80-87.
Murnane,R.J., Willett,J.B.(2010). Methods Matter. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Wasserstein, R.L.(2016). ASA关于统计意义和P-值的声明(方积乾译). 中国卫生统计, (3), 549-552.