?

An Issue of Teaching Critical Thinking: Argument or Inquiry?Insights from Russell, Dewey and Toulmin

  • Liuhua Zhang
Expand
  • Department of Philosophy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

Online published: 2021-05-31

Abstract

Russell’s critique against Dewey’s new logic in the early 20th century is a symbol of some controversy over the orientation of critical thinking training. This article sets out from a conception of argument popular in earlier analytic philosophy, exemplified by the Principle of Clifford, and thereby examines the historical quarrel over “inquiry” between Russell and Dewey and its embarrassing outcome. After introducing the new conception of argument propounded eminently by Stephen Toulmin and embedding it in Dewey’s theory of inquiry, it is showed in what sense Russell’s criticism against Dewey was based upon some serious misunderstanding of Dewey’s methodology as well as of his key texts. At last, for the viewpoint of philosophy of education, this article suggests that the conception of argument-as-inquiry has the advantage of emphasizing arguers’ engaging in a variety of living experience and warning them against converting academic arguments into some sort of linguistic games.

Cite this article

Liuhua Zhang . An Issue of Teaching Critical Thinking: Argument or Inquiry?Insights from Russell, Dewey and Toulmin[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021 , 39(6) : 71 -81 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.06.006

References

null 张留华. (2016). 哲学语言及其术语伦理. 中国社会科学, (12), 41- 59.
null 张留华. (2020). 信念规范的经济之维: 对“实用性”的一种解读. 社会科学, (9), 112- 123.
null Clifford, W. K. (2011). Lectures and Essays, volume 2, edited by Leslie Stephen and Frederick Pollock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
null Dewey, J. (1916). Essays in Experimental Logic. New York: Dover Publications.
null Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
null Dewey, J. (1941). Propositions, Warranted Assertibility, and Truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 38(7), 169—186.
null Dewey, J. (1958). “Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder”, in The Philosophy of John Dewey, edited by P. A. Schilpp. New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 515?608.
null Gale, R. (1959). Russell’s Drill Sergeant and Bricklayer and Dewey’s Logic. The Journal of Philosophy, 56(9), 401—406.
null Haack, S. (1997). “‘The Ethics of Belief’ Reconsidered”, in The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 129?144.
null Hurley, P. J. (2015). A Concise Introduction to Logic. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
null Hunter, D. A. (2014). A Practical Guide to Critical Thinking: Deciding What to Do and Believe. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
null James, W. (1956). The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Dover.
null James, W. (1995). Pragmatism. New York: Dover.
null Johnston, J. S. (2009). Deweyan Inquiry: From Educational Theory to Practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
null Madigan, T. J. (2009). W. K. Clifford andThe Ethics of Belief”. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
null Monk, R. (1996). Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude (1872—1921). New York: The Free Press.
null Russell, B. (1910). Philosophical Essays. London: Longmans, Green.
null Russell, B. (1958). “Dewey’s New Logic”, in The Philosophy of John Dewey, edited by P. A. Schilpp. New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 135?156.
null Russell, B. (1995). An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London and New York: Routledge.
null Russell, B. (1996). History of Western Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
null Russell, B. (1997). “The Spirit of Inquiry”, in The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 11. London: Routledge, 432?440.
null Toulmin, S., R. Rieke and A. Janik. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
null Toulmin, S. E. (2001). Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
null Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Outlines

/