中国人文社会科学核心期刊Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences) ›› 2001, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 22-35.
Previous Articles Next Articles
建军 王, 显华 黄
Received:2001-03-01
Online:2001-06-01
Published:2022-10-10
建军 王, 显华 黄. [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2001, 19(2): 22-35.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
"
"
"
"
| 陈惠邦: 《教育行动研究》, 台湾师大书苑有限公司, 1998年. | |
| 蔡清田: 《教育行动研究》, 台湾五南图书出版公司, 2000年. | |
| 张嘉育: 《认识学校本位课程发展》, 载课程与教学学会编: 《学校本位课程与教学创新》, 台湾扬智文化事业股份有限公司, 1998年. | |
| 黄显华: 《"以学校为本位课程发展"性质的探究》, 载黄显华编著: 《强迫普及学校教育﹔制度与课程》, 香港中文大学出版社, 1997年. | |
| 黄显华、刘润牛: 《强迫普及教育实施后香港课程设计的发展》, 载黄显华编著: 《强迫普及学校教育: 制度与课程》, 香港中文大学出版社, 1997年. | |
| 吴刚平: 《论校本课程开发》, 上海华东师范大学博士学位论文, 2000年. | |
| 徐玉珍: 《群体审议--─教师参与学校课程决策的一个参考框架》, 载《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》1995年第4期. | |
| C.Adelman, (1997).Action Rescarch; The Problem ofParticipation.In Robin McTaggart(Ed.).Participatory Action Research: International Contexts and Consequences.State University of New York Press. | |
| C.Argyris, R.Putnam, & D.M.Smith, (1985). Action Science. Jossye-Bass Publishers. | |
| J.F. Baumann. (1996).Conflict or Compatibility in Classroom Inquiry?One Teacher's Struggle to Balance Teaching and Research. Fducational Researcher, Vol.25, No.7, pp.29- 36. | |
| M. Ben-Peretz, (1975). The Conceptof Curriculum Potential.Curriculun Theory Network, Vol.5, No.2, pp.151 - 159. | |
| J.Biggs, & K.Collis, (1989). Towards a Model of School-based Curriculum Development and Assessment Using the SOLO Taxonomy.Australian Journal of Education, Vol.33, No.2, pp.151- 163. | |
| L.Brady, (1987). Explaining School-based Curricu-lum Satisfaction: A Case Study.Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.19, No.4, pp.375- 378. | |
| G.Bunaford, (1996).A Life of lts Own: Teacher Research and Transforming the Curriculum. In Gail Burraford, Joseph Fischer & David Hobson (1996). Teachers Doing | |
| Rescarch: Practical Possiblilitics.New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. | |
| F.Carr, & S.Kemmis, (1986). Becoming Critical.Deakin University Press. | |
| D.J.Clandinin & F.M.Connelly, (1995). Teachers'Professional Knowledge Landscapes. Teachers CollegePress. | |
| R.W. Chinn, (1998). 'Teacher-Student Action Research: AnsweringMelissa'sQucstion. Teachingand Change, Vol.5, No.2, pp.99-115. | |
| F.M.Connelly, & D.J.Clandinin, (1988). Teachers as Curriculum Planners: Narratives of Experience. OISE & Teachers College Press. | |
| H.Cooper, (1996). Speaking Power to Truth: Reflection of an Educational Researcher After 4 Years of School Board Service. Educational Researcher, Vol.25, No.1, pp·29-34. | |
| Z.Dornyei & A.Malderez, (1997). Group Dynanics and Foreign Language Teaching. System, Vol. 25, No.1, pp.65-81. | |
| J.Elliott, (1991). Action Research for Education Change.Open University Press. | |
| J.Elliott, (1997). School-based Curriculum Development and Action Rescarch in the United Kingdom. In Sandra Hollingworth(Ed.). International Action Research: ACasebook for Educational Reform. Falmer Press. | |
| s.Crundy, (1982). Three Modes of Action Research.In Stephen Kermis & Robin McTaggart (1989) (Eds.).The Action Rescarch Reader (3t'Ed). Deakin UniversityPress. | |
| A.Hargreaves, (1982). The Rhetoric of School-Centred Innovation.Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.14, No.3, pp.251- 266. | |
| R.D.Hawthorne, (1990). Analyaing School-Based Collaborative Curiculum Decision Making. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, Vol.5, No.3, pp.279- 286. | |
| S.Keiny & T.Weiss, (1986). A Case Study 'of a School-based Curriculum Development as a Model for INSET.Journal of Education for Teaching, Vol.12, No.2, pp.155-162. | |
| S.Kemmis & R.McTaggart, (1982). The Action Research Planner. Deakin University. | |
| K.J.Kennedy, (1992). School-based Curriculum Developrment as a Policy Option for the 1990s: An Australian Perspective.Joumal of Curriculum and Supervision, Vol.7, No.2, pp.180 -195. | |
| P.Knight, (1985). The Practice of School-based Curriculum Development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.17, No.!, pp.37- 48. | |
| K.Lewin, (1946a). Action Rescarch and Minority Problems.In Gertrud Weiss Lewin(1997)(Ed.)Resolvingsocial conflicts; &, Field theory in social science.Washing-tor, DC: American Psychological Association. | |
| K.Lewin, (1946b).The Dynamics of Croup Action.In Martin Gold(1999)(Ed.). Te Complete Social Scientist: AKurt Lewin Reader. Washington, D.C. : American Psycho-logical Association. | |
| K. Lewin, (1948). Group Decision and Social Change. In Martin Gold(1999)(Ed.).The Complete Social Scicntist: A Kurt Lewin Reader.Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association. | |
| C.Marsh, C. Day, L. Harnay, & C.McCutcheon, (1990). Reconceptuaizing School-based Curriculurm Developrment. Falmer Press. | |
| G.McCutcheon & B.Jung, (1990).Altemative Perspectives on Action Rescarch.Theory Into Practice, Vol.29, No.3, pp.144-151. | |
| J.McKernan,(1988). The Countenance of Curriculurn Action Research:Traditional, Collaorative , and Emancipatory-Critical Conceptions.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,Vol.3,No.3,pp.173- 200. | |
| J.McKernan, ( 1991). Curriculum Action Hesearch.NY:St.Martin's Press. | |
| J.McNif,( 1988). Action Research:Principles and Practice.Routledge. | |
| J.McNiff,P.Loax,&J.Whitehead, ( 1996). You and Your Action esearch Project.London & NY: Routledgc & Hyde Publications. | |
| C.E.Mills,(2000). Action Research: A Cuide for the Teacher Researchcr.New Youk & Ohio:Merrill. | |
| J.E. Miller,J. Trimbur,&J.M.Wilkes,( 1994 ).Group Dynamics :Understanding Group Success and Failurein Collaborative Learning.New Directions for Teaching ard earming,No.59,pp.33-44. | |
| OECD ( 1979 ). School-BasedCuriculum Developrment . OECD. | |
| S.N.Oja,& L.Smulyan,(1989).Collaborative ActionResearch: A Developrmertal Approach.Falmer Press. | |
| P.0.Okunrotifa,( 1971). Curriculum Improvement through Action Research.Teacher Education in New Countries,Vol.12,No.2,pp.153- 163. | |
| M.Print, ( 1993). Curriculum Developrnent and Design(2ed. ). Allen& Unwin. | |
| N.Sabar, ( 1983) . Towards School-based Curricuum Development :TrainingSchool Curriculum Co-ordinators .Journal af Curiculurn Studies,Vol.15,No.4,pp.431-434. | |
| N.Sabar, ( 1985). School-based Curriculum Developmert : eflections from an InternationalSeminar . Jounal of Curriculum Studies,Vol.17,No.4, pp.452- 454. | |
| R.A.Schmuck, ( 1997). Practical Action Research For Change.IRI/Skylght Training & Publishing Ic. | |
| M.Skilbeck,( 1983).School-based Curriculum Development . In V.Lee&D.Zeldin ( Eds. ). Planning the Curriculurm. London:Hodder &Stoughton. | |
| L.Stenhouse, ( 1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development.London:Heinemann. | |
| L.Stenhouse,( 1980) ( Ed.).Curiculum Research and Development in Action.Heinemann Eucational Books . | |
| E.T.Stringer,( 1999). Action Research(2l edl. ) .Sage Publications. | |
| M.M.Van.( 1990). Beyord Assumptions :Shifting the Lamits ofAction Rescarch.Theory Into Practiced,Vol.29,No.3,pp.152-157: | |
| W.F. Whyte,( 1991)(Ed.).Participatory Action Research.SACE Publications. | |
| s.Wilson, ( 1995). Not Tension but Intention: A Response to Wong's Analysis of the Researcher/Teacher.Educational Research, Vol.24,No.3,pp.22- 28. | |
| E.D.Wong, ( 1995b).Challenges Confronting the ResearcherTeacher :Conflicts of Purpose and Conduct.Educational Researcher,Vol.24,No.3, pp.22- 28. | |
| E.D.Wong, ( 1995b). Challenges Confrorting the ResearcherTeacher : A Rejainder to Wilson . Educational Researcher,Vol.24,No.8,pp.22- 23. | |
| Zubert-Skerritt ( 1991)(Ed.). Action Research for Change and Development . Avebury. |
| No related articles found! |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
