Research on Competency of Teaching-research Officers: Construction and Application of Multi Structure Level Model

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.05.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Teaching-research officers play an important role in teaching reform of basic education, improved quality of regional education and the transformation and development of teaching research. Their competency level can directly affect the teaching-research system, teaching-research theory or teaching-research practice, and determine the construction of teaching-research system with Chinese characteristics. In order to identify the professional characteristics and outstanding professional performance of teaching-research officers, their competency structure was difined, based on mathematical evidence-based thinking and combined with behavioral event interview, questionnaire survey and other methods. Also, a theoretical model of teaching-research officers' competency was constructed, including professional knowledge, curriculum construction, teaching development, scientific research, organizational leadership and professional quality. Then we used this model to explore the development level and function mechanism of teaching-research officers. We find that they are generally competent for teaching and research work, outstanding in professional quality, teaching development and organizational leadership, but with unstable performance in curriculum construction and scientific research. In order to confirm the different performance of the competency development, under the guidance of big data concept and algorithm thinking, we used cluster analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis and other methods to explore the sample data. It is found that there are obvious differences in competency development among teaching-research officers and there are three types of officers: "passive and survival ", "happy and potential" and "active and strong". In addition, the mechanism of faculty member competency is also clarified. It's found that faculty member self-efficacy has a direct impact on competency, and organizational climate mainly affects competency through faculty member self-efficacy. At present, in order to promote the innovative application of the competency model, we can focus on the construction of teaching-research theory discourse system with Chinese characteristics, meet the development requirements of teaching-research system of basic education in the new era. It's also important to improve the in-out mechanism of “selection, evaluation and appointment” and support the transformation of teaching-research officers with high-quality professional and innovative vision.

Key words: teaching-research officers, competency, teaching and research, self-efficacy, organizational climate

Shengquan Luo, Jiali Zhao. Research on Competency of Teaching-research Officers: Construction and Application of Multi Structure Level Model[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(5): 68-84.

Figures/Tables 13

References 0

	段锦云, 王娟娟, 朱月龙组织氛围研究: 概念测量、理论基础及评价展望心理科学进展 2014 12 1964 1974 段锦云, 王娟娟, 朱月龙. (2014). 组织氛围研究: 概念测量、理论基础及评价展望. 心理科学进展,(12),1964—1974.
	弗莱德•R•多尔迈. (1992). 主体性的黄昏. (万俊人等译).上海: 上海人民出版社.
	金冬梅. (2012). 组织气氛对人力资源管理的影响研究. 北京: 经济科学出版社.
	梁威, 卢立涛, 黄冬芳中国特色基础教育教学研究制度的发展教育研究 2010 12 77 82 梁威, 卢立涛, 黄冬芳. (2010). 中国特色基础教育教学研究制度的发展. 教育研究,(12),77—82.
	梁威, 卢立涛, 黄冬芳. (2011). 撬动中国基础教育的支点: 中国特色教研制度发展研究. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
	刘文君美国现行教学督导系统及其特征比较教育研究 2007 7 12 16 刘文君. (2007). 美国现行教学督导系统及其特征. 比较教育研究,(7),12—16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2007.07.003
	刘小平员工组织承诺的形成过程: 内部机制和外部影响——基于社会交换理论的实证研究管理世界 2011 11 92 104 刘小平. (2011). 员工组织承诺的形成过程: 内部机制和外部影响—基于社会交换理论的实证研究. 管理世界,(11),92—104.
	刘旭东, 花文凤迈向承认: 教研员的行动旨归西北师大学报(社会科学版) 2017 4 76 81 刘旭东, 花文凤. (2017). 迈向承认: 教研员的行动旨归. 西北师大学报(社会科学版),(4),76—81.
	罗生全, 孟宪云教研员胜任力初探教育研究 2017 9 124 130 罗生全, 孟宪云. (2017). 教研员胜任力初探. 教育研究,(9),124—130.
	钱旭升, 方晨阳中小学教研员自我效能的内在结构与水平特征教育研究 2019 12 59 66 钱旭升, 方晨阳. (2019). 中小学教研员自我效能的内在结构与水平特征. 教育研究,(12),59—66.
	钱一呈. (2006). 外国教育督导与评价制度研究. 北京: 中央广播电视大学出版社.
	任学宝教研的转型方向与使命课程•教材•教法 2017 4 15 18 任学宝. (2017). 教研的转型方向与使命. 课程•教材•教法,(4),15—18.
	苏锦旗, 薛惠锋, 詹海亮基于划分的K-均值初始聚类中心优化算法微电子学与计算机 2009 1 8 11 苏锦旗, 薛惠锋, 詹海亮. (2009). 基于划分的K-均值初始聚类中心优化算法. 微电子学与计算机,(1),8—11.
	田慧生从传统教研向现代教研转变人民教育 2014 22 1 1 田慧生. (2014). 从传统教研向现代教研转变. 人民教育,(22),1-1.
	王艳玲, 胡惠闵基础教育教研工作转型: 理念倡导与实践创新全球教育展望 2019 12 31 37 王艳玲, 胡惠闵. (2019). 基础教育教研工作转型: 理念倡导与实践创新. 全球教育展望,(12),31—37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9670.2019.12.003
	温忠麟,叶宝娟中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展心理科学进展 2014 5 731 745 温忠麟,叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展,(5),731—745.
	吴明隆. (2010). 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
	徐建平. (2004). 教师胜任力模型测评与研究. 北京师范大学博士学位论文.
	张行涛, 李玉平. (2003). 走进校本教研. 北京: 开明出版社.
	张焕庭. (1989). 教育辞典. 南京: 江苏教育出版社.
	张若勇, 刘新梅, 沈力, 王海珍服务氛围与一线员工服务绩效: 工作压力和组织认同的调节效应研究南开管理评论 2009 3 4 11 张若勇, 刘新梅, 沈力, 王海珍. (2009). 服务氛围与一线员工服务绩效: 工作压力和组织认同的调节效应研究. 南开管理评论,(3),4—11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2009.03.002
	赵佳丽, 罗生全中小学教研员胜任力调查研究课程•教材•教法 2020 6 137 143 赵佳丽, 罗生全. (2020). 中小学教研员胜任力调查研究. 课程•教材•教法,(6),137—143.
	赵佳丽. (2017). 中学语文教研员胜任力调查研究. 西南大学硕士学位论文.
	中华人民共和国教育部. (2001). 基础教育课程改革纲要(试行).
	中华人民共和国教育部. (2019). 教育部关于加强和改进新时代基础教育教研工作的意见.
	仲理峰, 时勘. （2003）. 胜任特征研究的新进展.南开管理评论, （2）, 4—8.
	周文叶, 陈铭洲寻找支点: 用影响力资本撬动中国教研创新——全国首届教研创新论坛综述教育发展研究 2016 20 81 84 周文叶, 陈铭洲. (2016). 寻找支点: 用影响力资本撬动中国教研创新—全国首届教研创新论坛综述. 教育发展研究,(20),81—84.
	Bandura, A Adolescent development from an agentic perspective Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents 2006 5 1 43 Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, (5), 1—43.
	Muchinsky, P. M An assessment of the Litwin and Stringer organization climate questionnaire: An empirical and theoretical extension of the Sims and LaFollette study Personnel psychology 1976 29 371 392 Muchinsky, P. M. (1976). An assessment of the Litwin and Stringer organization climate questionnaire: An empirical and theoretical extension of the Sims and LaFollette study. Personnel psychology, (29), 371—392.
	Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H Organizational climate and culture Annual review of psychology 2013 64 361 388 Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual review of psychology, (64), 361—388.
	Sims, H. P., & LaFollette, W An assessment of the Litwin and Stringer organization climate questionnaire Personnel psychology 1975 1 19 38 Sims, H. P., & LaFollette, W. (1975). An assessment of the Litwin and Stringer organization climate questionnaire. Personnel psychology, (1), 19—38.
	Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S. M.(1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
	Tubbs, S. L., & Schulz, E Exploring a taxonomy of global leadership competencies and meta-competencies Journal of American Academy of Business 2006 2 29 34 Tubbs, S. L., & Schulz, E. (2006). Exploring a taxonomy of global leadership competencies and meta-competencies. Journal of American Academy of Business, (2), 29—34.

结构群	胜任特征
专业知识	学科专业知识、学科教学法知识、教研知识
课程建设	课程设计、课程开发、课标解读
教学发展	教学指导、试题命制、推广应用
科学研究	课题论证、方案实施、成果表达、成果评价
组织领导	理解他人、团队合作、活动设计、专业培训、创新实践、理念提升、人际沟通
专业品质	角色认知、守业敬业、学习发展、个人魅力、灵活应变、成就动机

簇类	样本数	中心点均值	水平划分
第一簇	36	?3.27	第一水平
第二簇	398	?0.56	第二水平
第三簇	755	0.45	第三水平

变量	第一水平	第二水平	第三水平	总体水平
变量	M/SD	M/SD	M/SD	M/SD
专业知识	1.64/0.58	3.66/0.45	4.28/0.37	4.06/0.67
课程建设	1.81/1.65	2.99/0.56	3.70/0.50	3.46/0.68
教学发展	1.69/2.42	3.73/0.50	4.44/0.43	4.12/0.72
科学研究	1.60/2.26	3.31/0.64	4.25/0.54	3.85/0.83
组织领导	1.63/2.48	3.73/0.42	4.44/0.34	4.12/0.66
专业品质	1.83/2.30	3.81/0.51	4.40/0.38	4.13/0.66
胜任力	1.70/2.28	3.60/0.29	4.29/0.20	3.98/0.57

簇类	样本数	中心点均值	水平划分
第一簇	648	4.32	A水平
第二簇	508	3.82	B水平
第三簇	33	1.82	C水平

变量	A水平	B水平	C水平	总体水平
变量	M/SD	M/SD	M/SD	M/SD
认知效能	4.85/0.29	4.03/0.58	1.45/0.58	4.40/0.78
情绪效能	4.77/0.37	3.83/0.44	1.59/0.65	4.28/0.77
意志效能	4.75/0.31	3.97/0.39	1.67/0.74	4.33/0.69
自我效能	4.79/0.21	3.96/0.32	1.58/0.59	4.34/0.68