|
操太圣 “五唯”问题: 高校教师评价的后果、根源及解困路向 大学教育科学 2019 1 27 32 操太圣. (2019). “五唯”问题: 高校教师评价的后果、根源及解困路向. 大学教育科学,(1),27—32.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0717.2019.01.005
|
|
董彦邦, 刘莉 高校医学院本部教师最认同什么样的科研评价制度?——基于对我国18所高校医学院本部教师的调查 复旦教育论坛 2021 19 5 105 112 董彦邦, 刘莉. (2021). 高校医学院本部教师最认同什么样的科研评价制度?—基于对我国18所高校医学院本部教师的调查. 复旦教育论坛,19(5),105—112.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0059.2021.05.016
|
|
赖鼎铭 量化指标并非学术评鉴的万灵丹: 以国外几种代表性的学术评鉴为例 图书馆学与资讯科学 2005 31 1 14 33 赖鼎铭. (2005). 量化指标并非学术评鉴的万灵丹: 以国外几种代表性的学术评鉴为例. 图书馆学与资讯科学,31(1),14—33.
|
|
李文平 大学教师对教师评价制度的满意度调查分析 高校教育管理 2017 3 95 104 李文平. (2017). 大学教师对教师评价制度的满意度调查分析. 高校教育管理,(3),95—104.
doi: 10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.20170427.013
|
|
刘莉, 朱莉, 刘念才 目标群体视角下高校教师科研评价政策认同研究——基于20所“双一流”建设高校的问卷调查 清华大学教育研究 2020 41 4 73 82 刘莉, 朱莉, 刘念才. (2020). 目标群体视角下高校教师科研评价政策认同研究—基于20所“双一流”建设高校的问卷调查. 清华大学教育研究,41(4),73—82.
doi: 10.14138/j.1001-4519.2020.02.007310
|
|
秦琳. (2019-10-24). 如何破解高校“唯论文”顽疾. 光明日报, (14).
|
|
苏锦丽, 黄曙东 美国大学教师评鉴制度之探讨 教育政策论坛 2009 2 1 44 苏锦丽, 黄曙东. (2009). 美国大学教师评鉴制度之探讨. 教育政策论坛,(2),1—44.
|
|
习近平. (2020). 习近平谈治国理政. 北京: 外文出版社.
|
|
阎光才, 岳英 高校学术评价过程中的认可机制及其合理性——以经济学领域为个案的实证研究 教育研究 2012 10 75 83 阎光才, 岳英. (2012). 高校学术评价过程中的认可机制及其合理性—以经济学领域为个案的实证研究. 教育研究,(10),75—83.
|
|
阎光才 高水平大学教师本科教学投入及其影响因素分析 中国高教研究 2018 11 22 27 阎光才. (2018). 高水平大学教师本科教学投入及其影响因素分析. 中国高教研究,(11),22—27.
doi: 10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2018.11.05
|
|
Amaranti, M Uso de Resultados de la Evaluación Docente para Mejorar la Calidad de la Docencia Universitaria Congreso Universidad 2017 6 1 91 114 Amaranti, M. (2017). Uso de Resultados de la Evaluación Docente para Mejorar la Calidad de la Docencia Universitaria. Congreso Universidad, 6(1), 91—114.
|
|
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
|
|
Erickson, M., Hanna, P., & Walker, C The UK Higher Education Senior Management Survey: A Statactivist Response to Managerialist Governance Studies in Higher Education 2021 46 11 2134 2151 Erickson, M., Hanna, P., & Walker, C. (2021). The UK Higher Education Senior Management Survey: A Statactivist Response to Managerialist Governance. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2134—2151.
doi: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1712693
|
|
Hill, H. C Fixing Teacher Professional Development Phi Delta Kappan 2009 90 7 470 477 Hill, H. C. (2009). Fixing Teacher Professional Development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 470—477.
doi: 10.1177/003172170909000705
|
|
Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E Portfolios for Learning, Assessment and Professional Development in Higher Education Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2006 31 3 267 286 Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for Learning, Assessment and Professional Development in Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 267—286.
doi: 10.1080/02602930500352816
|
|
Laudel, G., & Glaser, J Tensions Between Evaluations and Communications Practices Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 2006 28 3 289 295 Laudel, G., & Glaser, J. (2006). Tensions Between Evaluations and Communications Practices. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3), 289—295.
doi: 10.1080/13600800600980130
|
|
Lu, H., & Zhang, X. R. (2021). Emotional Responses Toward a New Research Policy Among Academics in a Chinese University. Front Psychol, 12(11).
|
|
Meng, Q., & Wang, G A Research on Sources of University Faculty Occupational Stress: A Chinese Case Study Psychology Research and Behaviour Management Journal 2018 11 597 605 Meng, Q., & Wang, G. (2018). A Research on Sources of University Faculty Occupational Stress: A Chinese Case Study. Psychology Research and Behaviour Management Journal, 11, 597—605.
|
|
Prodegers, S. B Toward Systematic Faculty Evaluation Regional Spotlight 1980 13 2 1 19 Prodegers, S. B. (1980). Toward Systematic Faculty Evaluation. Regional Spotlight, 13(2), 1—19.
|
|
Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L The Effect of Different Teaching, Research, and Service Emphases on Individual and Organizational Outcomes in Higher Education Institutions Journal of Education for Business 2009 84 3 169 176 Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L. (2009). The Effect of Different Teaching, Research, and Service Emphases on Individual and Organizational Outcomes in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(3), 169—176.
doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.3.169-176
|