Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences) >
On the Governance Function of Educational Evaluation and Its Self-reflexive Stance
Online published: 2021-08-04
In the perspective of inter-subjectivity, edcational evaluation is a ubiquitous value processing, and sense-making as well. There are different combinations between formal and informal education and formal and informal evaluation. The formal evaluation of formal education plays the role of direction to the professional development in educational evaluation. Any educational evaluation is executed in a specific field. Therefore, it is context bounded. Educational evaluation is an instrument of governance, sharing the functions of governance. At the different governance level, from individual to organization, state and the international communities, evaluation has the different contents. Good governance is a kind of evaluation at the state level. It also has the directory value for the educational governance. Evaluation itself is the object of governance, while it has the function of governance. Educational evaluation should stick to the self-reflexive stance, keeping itself under re-evaluation. On the one hand, the meta-evaluation awareness should be raised. On the other hand, it should be on the alert against behaviorism, economism, localism and opportunism in the evaluation exercises.
Zuoyu Zhou . On the Governance Function of Educational Evaluation and Its Self-reflexive Stance[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021 , 39(8) : 1 -19 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.08.001
null | 贝塔朗菲, 拉威奥莱特. (1989). 人的系统观(张志伟等译). 北京: 华夏出版社. |
null | 杜威. (2007). 评价理论(冯平, 余泽娜等译). 上海: 上海译文出版社. |
null | 冯平. (1995). 评价论. 北京: 东方出版社. |
null | 卡斯特, 罗森茨韦克. (1985). 组织与管理——系统方法与权变方法(李柱流等译). 北京: 中国社会科学出版社. |
null | 俞可平. (2000). 治理与善治. 北京: 中国社科文献出版社. |
null | 中共中央, 国务院. (2020). 深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案. 取自http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm. |
null | Agrawal, R., Kalugampitiya, A., Rinzin, J., and Hashim, K. (2017), Leveraging Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Good Governance. Retrieved from https://ideas-global.org/wp-content/uploads//2017/12/Chapter-11.pdf |
null | Auerbach, J. S., & Blatt, S. J Self-Reflexivity, Intersubjectivity, and Therapeutic Change Psychoanalytic Psychology 2001 18 3 427 450 Auerbach, J. S., & Blatt, S. J. (2001). Self-Reflexivity, Intersubjectivity, and Therapeutic Change. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18(3), 427—450. |
null | Boonwaat, L. (2001). An overview of alternative development and illicit crop eradication policies, strategies and actions in the region. In: Proceedings of a regional seminar on Alternative Development: Sharing Good Practices Facing Common Problems. Bangkok: UNODC-Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific,129?148. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/alternative-development/Manual_MonitoringEval.pdf. |
null | Bowman, M.L. (1989), Testing Differences in Ancient China, The American Psychologist, 44(3), 576?578. |
null | Dahler-Larsen, P., & Boodhoo, A Evaluation culture and good governance: Is there a link? Evaluation 2019 25 3 277 293 Dahler-Larsen, P., & Boodhoo, A. (2019). Evaluation culture and good governance: Is there a link?. Evaluation, 25(3), 277—293. |
null | Denzin, N. K Moments, Mixed Methods, and Paradigm Dialogs Qualitative Inquiry 2010 16 6 419 427 Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, Mixed Methods, and Paradigm Dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 419—427. |
null | Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Sage Publications, Inc. |
null | Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass. |
null | Hanberger, A Evaluationin Local School Governance: A Framework for Analysis Education Inquiry 2016 7 3 217 236 Hanberger, A. (2016). Evaluationin Local School Governance: A Framework for Analysis. Education Inquiry, 7(3), 217—236. |
null | Johnston, M. (2016), Good Governance: Rule of Law, Transparency, and Accountability. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael_Johnston26/publication/267974525_Good_Governance_Rule_of_Law_Transparency_and_Accountability/links/570d0b1908aed31341cf00c6/Good-Governance-Rule-of-Law-Transparency-and-Accountability.pdf?origin=publication_detail |
null | Martin, W. A. P. (1870), Competitive examinations in China, The North Atlantic Review, 111(228), 62?77. |
null | Osuji Shifting Paradigm in our Educational Assessment Global Advanced Research Journal of Educational Research and Review 2015 4 1 001 005 Osuji. (2015). Shifting Paradigm in our Educational Assessment. Global Advanced Research Journal of Educational Research and Review, 4(1), 001—005. |
null | Rerkasem, K. (2000). Regional perspectives on alternative development (AD). Paper prepared for UNODC seminar on Cooperation for Alternative Socio-Economic Development to Replace Opium Poppy Cultivation. Hanoi: Vietnam, 7. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/alternative-development/Manual_MonitoringEval.pdf. |
null | Schlagenhauf, J. (2020). Improve Governance with Policy Evaluation, OECD Public Governance Review. |
null | Scriven, M. (1971). Evaluating Educational Programs. In F. G. Caro (ed.), Reading in Evaluation Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. |
null | Shulman, L. S Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching Educational Researcher 1986 15 2 4 14 Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4—14. |
null | Starbuck, W. H. (2015). (2015). Karl E. Weick and the dawning awareness of organized cognition. Management Decision, 53(6), 1287–1299. |
null | Stufflebeam, D. L The Meta evaluation Imperative American Journal of Evaluation 2001 22 2 183 209 Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). The Meta evaluation Imperative. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 183—209. |
null | Stufflebeam, D. L A Note on the Purposes, Development, and Applicability of the Joint Committee Evaluation Standards American Journal of Evaluation 2004 25 1 99 102 Stufflebeam, D. L. (2004). A Note on the Purposes, Development, and Applicability of the Joint Committee Evaluation Standards. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(1), 99—102. |
null | UNESCAP. (2009), What is Good Governance? Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/knowledge-products/good-governance.pdf |
null | Weick, K. E Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems Administrative Science Quarterly 1976 21 1 1 19 Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1—19. |
null | Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program Evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines(Second Edition). USA: Longman Publishers. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |