Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences) >
Research on the Construction of High-quality Early Childhood Education Indicators System in China
Online published: 2021-12-21
This study uses the thinking method of “four beams and eight pillars”, draws on the structural logic of the CIPP evaluation model and follows the five-step research path of sequential evidence-based to analyze the status quo, international comparison, theoretical formulation, empirical construction and policy suggestions of China’s early childhood education indicators system. First, it selected the current Chinese early childhood education texts that have great influence in China to conduct content analysis to structurally describe the status quo of China’s early childhood education indicators system. Then it analyzed the structural problems of China’s current early childhood education indicators system by juxtaposing and comparing the structural framework and specific indicators in both domestic and international early childhood education indicators system. Subsequently, it conceived the structural framework and specific contents of the high-quality early childhood education indicators system including four first-level indicators of background, input, process and outcome, 13 second-level indicators and 55 third-level indicators. Then, based on empirical research, it constructed the “four beams and eight pillars” and key indicators of the new era China’s high-quality early childhood education indicators system, which includes four first-level indicators (value quality, condition quality, process quality, and outcome quality), eight second-level indicators (value orientation, social background, system and mechanism, resource allocation, care and education, management of kindergartens, popularization and universal benefit, safety and high quality) and 57 third-level indicators. Finally, it put forward five policy recommendations for the construction of China’s high-quality early childhood education indicators system. First, actively construct a structural framework to impove overall attention to systemic quality. Second, pay special attention to background factors to ensure priority attention to value quality.Third, pay attention continuously to input factors to ensure long-term attention to condition quality. Fourth, put emphasis strongly on process factors to ensure focus on process quality. Fifth, rationally strengthen the output factors to ensure comprehensive attention to the outcome quality.
Liyan Huo , Qiangqiang Sun , Zhengyu Long . Research on the Construction of High-quality Early Childhood Education Indicators System in China[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022 , 40(1) : 1 -18 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.01.001
null | 蔡鑫, 高峰, 张静波. (2014). 中国的转型. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社. |
null | 北京市教委. 北京市人民政府教育督导室. (2019). 北京市幼儿园办园质量督导评估办法(试行). 取自: http://jw.beijing.gov.cn/xxgk/zxxxgk/201902/t20190215_1446602.html. 2020−05−08. |
null | 国家统计局. (2019). 中国教育统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社. |
null | 河北省教育厅. (2009). 河北省城市幼儿园分类评定标准(试行). 取自: http://www.jyj.cangzhou.gov.cn/jcjy/502656.shtml. 2020−06−04. |
null | 洪雯柔. (2000). 贝瑞岱比较教育研究方法之探析. 台北: 扬智文化事业股份有限公司. |
null | 霍力岩, 孙蔷蔷, 胡恒波 中国学前教育指标体系的理论构想与适用性考察 教育研究 2019 40 02 50 61 霍力岩, 孙蔷蔷, 胡恒波. (2019). 中国学前教育指标体系的理论构想与适用性考察. 教育研究,40(02),50—61. |
null | 江苏省教育厅. (2012). 江苏学前教育改革发展示范区建设督导评估指标. 取自: https://max.book118.com/html/2018/0212/152862243.shtm. 2020−05−08. |
null | 教育部. (2012a). 学前教育发展状况监测统计表. 取自: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A11/s6500/201202/t20120212_136728.html. 2020−05−08. |
null | 教育部. (2012b). 学前教育督导评估暂行办法. 取自: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A11/s6500/201202/t20120212_136728.html. 2020−05−08. |
null | 教育部. (2015). 中国教育监测与评价统计指标体系. 取自: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A03/s182/201509/t20150907_206014.html. 2020−05−08. |
null | 教育部.(2017). 幼儿园办园行为督导评估办法. 取自: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A11/s6500/201705/t20170512_304460.html. 2020−05−08. |
null | 庞丽娟, 范明丽 当前我国学前教育管理体制面临的主要问题与挑战 教育发展研究 2012 32 04 39 43 庞丽娟, 范明丽. (2012). 当前我国学前教育管理体制面临的主要问题与挑战. 教育发展研究,32(04),39—43. |
null | 上海市教委. 上海市人民政府教育督导室. (2016). 上海市学前教育三年行动计划(2015—2017年)督导评估指标. 取自: http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2319/nw12344/u26aw47255.html. 2020−05−08. |
null | 新疆维吾尔自治区教育厅. (2013). 新疆维吾尔自治区幼儿园等级评估标准(试行). 取自: https://wenku.baidu.com/view/e8462c79974bcf84b9d528ea81c758f5f61f293c.html. 2020−05−08 |
null | 中共中央、国务院. (2019). 中国教育现代化2035. 取自: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201902/t20190223_370857.html. 2020−05−08. |
null | 中共中央. (2020). 关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议. 取自: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-11/03/content_5556991.htm. 2021−02−03. |
null | Fasano C Knowledge, ignorance and epistemic utility: issues in the construction of indicator systems DOCUMENT RESUME 1994 53 Fasano C. (1994). Knowledge, ignorance and epistemic utility: issues in the construction of indicator systems. DOCUMENT RESUME, 53. |
null | Nuttall, D The functions and limitations of international education indicators International Journal Educational Research 1990 14 329 Nuttall, D. (1990). The functions and limitations of international education indicators. International Journal Educational Research, 14, 329. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |