华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 94-102+171.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.03.010

• 专题二 • 上一篇    下一篇

小学科学教师中庸思维与科学观关系的实证研究

曲铭峰1, 张红霞1, 陆琪1, 吕林海1, 万东升2, 郁波3   

  1. 1. 南京大学教育研究院, 南京 210093;
    2. 江苏第二师范学院教育科学学院, 南京 210013;
    3. 中国教育科学研究院, 北京 100088
  • 出版日期:2017-06-20 发布日期:2017-05-16
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省“2011计划““基础教育人才培养模式协同创新”（南京师范大学主持）。

Correlation between Zhongyong Thinking and Views of Science among Primary Science Teachers in China

QU Mingfeng1, ZHANG Hongxia1, LU Qi1, LÜ Linhai1, WAN Dongsheng2, YU Bo3   

  1. 1. Institute of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
    2.The Second Normal University in Jiangsu Nanjing 210013,China;
    3. Chinese Institute of Education Beijing 100088, China
  • Online:2017-06-20 Published:2017-05-16

RichHTML

25

PDF

1204

摘要： 科学教师的科学观发展深受本土文化影响。基于大样本问卷调查和结构方程模型方法，本研究初步揭示了我国小学科学教师的中庸思维与科学观之间的复杂关系：对于经典科学观，中庸思维三个因子中的“深思熟虑”和“谦让宽容”呈现正效应，而“以和为贵”则大致为负效应；而对于现代科学观，结构方程的因果模型尚难建立。对中庸思维、经典科学观和现代科学观进行的聚类分析显示，教师可分为四大群体：成熟思维群体、科学主义群体、后现代主义群体和能力欠缺群体。科学教师培训须从经典科学做起，循序渐进，对症下药。

关键词: 中庸思维, 经典科学观, 现代科学观, 后现代科学观, 科学观发展

Abstract: Using structure equation model and other models, this study, based on a national survey of primary school science teachers in China, seeks to explore the complex correlation between teachers' [WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking and their views of science. It introduces a proxy variable of [WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking in Chinese culture into the model, while dividing views of science into the classic one and the modern one. It has been found that: (a) teachers'[WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking does not necessarily constitute an obstacle to the development of teachers' views of science; more than 1/3 of the participants developed their [WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] and science views synchronously with positive correlation co-efficient; (b)[WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking and views of science are both mutually enhanced and offset;(c) about 1/5 post-modernists had higher modern science score than the classic score, which was against the historic process of science; (d) Fourth, there is no positive correlation between [WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking and modern views of science. The article concludes with the suggestion that science teacher training in China should start from the stage of classic science, and give different people with different programs. Also, science education programs should be scheduled in line with the historical process instead of "skip-over development".

Key words: thinking, classic views of science, modern views of science, post-modern views of science, development of views on science