超越方法:教学即审美与精神的探求

  • 多尔·小威廉姆
展开
小威廉姆E·多尔(Wlliamn E. Doll, Jr), 美国路易斯安那州立大学课程与教学系教授、课程理论项目主任

收稿日期: 2002-12-01

  网络出版日期: 2022-10-10

摘要

本文从后现代主叉的视角上对基于方法的现代性的教学观进行了重新审视。作者首先对泰罗主义进行了批判分析,然后结合杜威的教育思想阐述了自己的有关教学的观点,最后提出了一种后现代主义的教学信条。

本文引用格式

多尔·小威廉姆 . 超越方法:教学即审美与精神的探求[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2003 , 21(1) : 34 -43, 52 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2003.01.005

Abstract

本文从后现代主叉的视角上对基于方法的现代性的教学观进行了重新审视。作者首先对泰罗主义进行了批判分析,然后结合杜威的教育思想阐述了自己的有关教学的观点,最后提出了一种后现代主义的教学信条。

参考文献

null Bronowski, J. (1978)、The Common Soanse of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
null Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Mind, Possible Warlds. Caumbridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
null Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life. New York; Anchor Books.
null Craig, H. (1952). The Enchanted Class. London: Henderson & Spalding. (Original publication, 1935)
null Descartes, R. (1950). Discourse on Method (L. J. LaF1eur, Trang.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Original publication, 1637)
null Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Henry Holt.
null Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and Nature. New York: Dover Publication. (Original publication, 1929)
null Dewey, J. (1963) Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books. (Original publication, 1938).
null Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and Education. New York: The Free Press.(0riginal publication, 1916)
null Dewey, J. (1971). How We Think. New York: D. C. Heath and Co. (Original publication, 1933).
null Dewey, J. (1980). Art as Experience. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sone. (OriginaJ publication, 1934).
null Dewey, J. (1990). The Child end the Curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original publication, 1902)
null Doll, W. (1972). "A Methodology of Experience: Part 1.Educational Theory, 22 (Summer), 309-324.
null Doll, W. (1973)."A Methodology of Experience: Part I."Educational Theory, 23 (Winter), 56-73.
null Doll, W. (1993). A Post-Modem Perspective on Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
null Doll, W. (1998). "Curriculum and Concepts of Control".in Curriculum: Toward New ldentities Wm. Pinar, Ed., New York: Garland (pp. 295 - 323).
null Doll, W. (2000). "Ghosts and the Curriculum." To appear in Wm.E. DolI, Jr. & Noel Gough(eds.) Curriculum Visions.New York: Peter Lang.
null Feyerabend, P.(1988). Against Method. London: Verso.
null Freige, T,(1576).Professio Regio.Basel.
null Garrison, J. (1997). Dewey and Fros. New York: Teachers College Press.
null Haber, 5. (1964). Efficiency and Uplift. Chicago: University df Chicago Press.
null Heidegger, M. (1977). "The Question Concerning Technology, "in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (Wm.Lovett, Trans.). New York: Garland (pp. 3- 3S). (Original German publication, 1954)
null Hlebowitsh, P. (1999). "The Burdens of the New Curricularist." Curriculum lnquiry, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Fall), 343-353.
null Jackson, P. (1998). John Dewey and the Lessons of An. New Haven; Yale University Press.
null Kanigel, R, (1997). The One Beat Way. New York: Viking.
null Kauffman, S. (1993). The Origins of Order. New York: Oxford University Press.
null Kauffman, S. (1995). At Home in the Universe, New York: Oxford University Press.
null Kliebard, H. (1995). "The Tyler Rationale Revisited." Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 27, No. 1, 81-88.
null Leibniz, G. W. (1951). " On the Method of Universality, " in Leibniz, Selections, (P. Weiner, Ed.). New York: Charlea Physical (pp. 1-87). New York: D. Appleton. (Original wock published 1859)
null Miller, P. (1939). The New England Mind. New York: Macmillan.
null Ong. W. J. (1971). Romance, Rhetoric, and Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
null Ong W. J, (1983). Ramus, Method and the Decay of Dialogue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pre8s. (Original publication, 1958)
null Oxford English Dictionary (1989). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
null Rice, J. M. (1914). Scientific Managerment in Education. New York: Amo Press. (Original publication, 1914)
null Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
null Sclden, S. (1999). Inheriting Shame. New York; Teachers College Press.
null Spencer H. (1929). "What Knowledge is of Most Worth?" in Herbert 0. Spencer (Ed.). Education: Intellectual, Moral, Physical (pp. 1-87). New York: D. Appleton. (Original work published 1859)
null Taylor, F. W. (1947). Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
null Toulmin, S, (1990). Cosmopolis. New York: 'The Free Press.
null Triche, S. (2000). "Reconceiving Curriculum, " Louisiana State University doctoral dissertation, unpublished.
null Tyler, R. (1950). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago; University of Chicago Press.
null White, M. (1973). Science and Sentiment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
null Whitehead, A. N. (1967). The Aims of Education. New: York: The Free Press.
null Wraga,W.(1999).Extracting Sum1-Beams out of Cucumbers:"The Retreat from Practice in Reconceptualized Curriculum Studies,"Educational Researcher, Vol, 28,No.1,4-13.
文章导航

/