专题:2024 年社会与情感能力研究(SSES)国际测评报告

中国青少年社会与情感能力第二轮测评技术报告

  • 邵志芳 ,
  • 唐一鹏 ,
  • 张静
展开
  • 1. 华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海 200062
    2. 华东师范大学教育学部教育学系,上海 200062
    3. 华东师范大学教育学部教育心理学系,上海 200062

网络出版日期: 2024-04-12

基金资助

国家社会科学基金 2022 年度教育学重点课题“我国青少年社会与情感能力培养研究”(ABA220028)。

The Technical Report on the 2nd Round OECD Survey of Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescence

  • Zhifang Shao ,
  • Yipeng Tang ,
  • Jing Zhang
Expand
  • 1. The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    2. Department of Education, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    3. Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Online published: 2024-04-12

摘要

本技术报告基于中国济南参加2023年社会与情感能力(Survey on Social and Emotional Skills,SSES)的测评数据,对第二轮测评工具在中国文化下的心理测量学特征进行分析。本报告简要介绍了学生问卷的开发和实施过程、社会与情感能力指标体系、问卷主要组成部分、数据集的主要内容,并对数据质量进行了分析。分析结果表明,济南参试学生参试态度认真积极,参试率和有效应答率高,但是10岁组产生了高分翘尾现象;采用ω系数和α系数来衡量分量表的信度,结果表明绝大多数分量表信度良好;运用验证性因子分析逐一检验社会与情感能力各个分量表的效度,发现拟合度较为满意;多组验证性因子分析表明,这些分量表跨性别测量等值性好于跨年龄组等值性,故在考察青少年社会与情感子能力的年龄差异时,对于等值性较差的分量表数据应慎重使用。

本文引用格式

邵志芳 , 唐一鹏 , 张静 . 中国青少年社会与情感能力第二轮测评技术报告[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024 , 42(5) : 58 -71 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.05.003

Abstract

Based on data from the 2023 Survey on Social and Emotional Skills (SSES) in Jinan, China, this technical report analyzes the psychometric characteristics of the second round of assessment tools under Chinese culture. The report presents a brief introduction of the development and implementation process of the student questionnaire, the subscales of the social and emotional skills, the main components of the questionnaire, the main content of the data set, and the analysis of data quality. The results showed that the students in Jinan had a positive attitude towards the Survey, with high participation rate and valid response rate. However, the frequency distributions of younger cohort showed a tall right tail. The coefficients ω’s and α’s represented that most of the subscales had good reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the validity (fitness) of each subscale of social and emotional skills were satisfactory. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis showed that the cross-gender measure invariance of these subscales was better than that of cross-cohorts, so the data of these subscales should be used with caution when examining the age-differences among adolescence.

参考文献

null 高丙成. 中国大陆学生一般自我效能感研究的元分析 中国特殊教育 2014 04 90 96 高丙成. (2014). 中国大陆学生一般自我效能感研究的元分析. 中国特殊教育,(04),90—96.
null 邵志芳, 刘志, 杨舒豫 & 黄忠敬. 开放能力: 中国青少年社会与情感能力测评分报告之四 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2021 09 77 92 邵志芳, 刘志, 杨舒豫 & 黄忠敬. (2021). 开放能力: 中国青少年社会与情感能力测评分报告之四. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),(09),77—92.
null 张静, 唐一鹏, 郭家俊, 邵志芳. 中国青少年社会与情感能力测评之技术报告 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2021 39 9 109 128 张静, 唐一鹏, 郭家俊, 邵志芳. (2021). 中国青少年社会与情感能力测评之技术报告. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 39(9), 109—128.
null 张敏, 雷开春, 张巧明. 中学生学习效能感的特点研究 心理科学 2005 05 1148 1151+1095 张敏, 雷开春, 张巧明. (2005). 中学生学习效能感的特点研究. 心理科学,(05),1148—1151+1095.
null Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure Structural Equation Modeling 2005 12 41 75 Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41—75.
null Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. Four ways five factors are basic Personality and Individual Differences 1992 13 6 653 665 Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653—665.
null Cronbach, L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests Psychometrika 1951 16 297 334 Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297—334.
null de Haan, A., De Pauw, S., van den Akk, A. Dekovic, M., & Prinzie, P. Long-Term Developmental Changes in Children’s Lower-Order Big Five Personality Facets Journal of Personality 2017 85 5 616 631 de Haan, A., De Pauw, S., van den Akk, A. Dekovic, M., & Prinzie, P. (2017). Long-Term Developmental Changes in Children’s Lower-Order Big Five Personality Facets. Journal of Personality, 85(5), 616—631.
null French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal 2006 13 378 402 French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 378—402.
null Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Draxler, C., Ziegler, M., & Buehner, M. Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cut-off values of fit indices Psychological Methods 2011 16 319 336 Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Draxler, C., Ziegler, M., & Buehner, M. (2011). Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cut-off values of fit indices. Psychological Methods, 16, 319—336.
null Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1999 6 1 55 Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1—55.
null Kankara?, M., Feron, E., & Renbarger, R. (2019), Assessing students’ social and emotional skills through triangulation of assessment methods. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 208, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/717ad7f2-en.
null Kankara?, M., & Suarez-Alvarez, J. (2019). Assessment framework of the OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 207, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5007adef-en.
null McDonald, R. (2013). Test Theory. New York: Psychology Press.
null OECD (2019). Curiosity and Creativity. Unpublished.
null OECD (2021a). OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills Technical Report. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/social-emotional-skills-study/sses-technical-report.pdf.
null OECD (2021b). Beyond Academic Learning: First Results from the Survey of Social and Emotional Skills, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en.
null Primi, R., Hauck-Filho, N., Valentini & Santos, D. (2020). Classical Perspectives of Controlling Acquiescence with Balanced Scales, In: Wiberg, M., Molenaar, D., González, J., B?ckenholt, U., Kim, JS. (eds) Quantitative Psychology. IMPS 2019. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 322. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43469-4_25.
null Soto, C., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011 100 2 330 348 Soto, C., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 330—348.
文章导航

/