网络出版日期: 2017-03-27
基金资助
国家社会科学基金“十二五”规划2014年度一般课题“德国教育学在中国的传播和影响研究”(BAA140015)
Reflection on the Tradition of Pedagogy
Online published: 2017-03-27
辛萌 , 侯怀银 . 教育学传统解读[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017 , 35(1) : 87 -92+123 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.01.009
There exists a close relationship between the tradition of pedagogy and pedagogy, but so far there has been limited research on the tradition of pedagogy. However, research on the tradition of pedagogy can not only contribute to further education researches, but also to the inheritance, innovation and development of pedagogy. Therefore, it is important to conduct a comprehensive systematic and intensive study of the tradition of pedagogy. Abstracted from pedagogy, the tradition of pedagogy is the integration of ideology, values, research categories, research paradigms, and knowledge hierarchy. The development of pedagogy has been closely related to culture and philosophical tradition. It has been inherited and created by researchers of pedagogy. The tradition of pedagogy mainly include four characteristics:a) stability, which is closely related to the Christmas Characteristics of the tradition of pedagogy; b) phased, which means pedagogy has undergone a process of gradual development; c) developmental, the development of tradition of pedagogy cannot be separated from its foundation, i.e. the foundation of tradition of pedagogy; d) referential, the development of pedagogy has borrowed a lot from other disciplines. The tradition of pedagogy is based on the development of pedagogy. Besides, the tradition of pedagogy is connected with tradition, cultural tradition, traditional pedagogy, pedagogical tradition, and the tradition of Marxist pedagogy. The tradition of pedagogy has positive effects on the development of pedagogy, and we should study the tradition of pedagogy in a critical way. On the other side, the tradition of pedagogy tends to be resistant to innovation, which in some ways has undermined the researcher's thinking. Also, the specialization of pedagogy has been questioned due to its borrowing from other disciplines.
Key words: pedagogy; tradition; features; difference; relationship
M.多冈, R.帕尔.(1990).社会科学中的杂交领域.国外社会科学, (2), 20-25.
高宁.(2008).教育的嬗变和文化传承.长沙:湖南大学出版社.
侯怀银.(1996).德育传统的当代价值.武汉:湖北教育出版社.
侯怀银, 辛萌.(2012).论马克思主义教育学传统.西北师大学报(社会科学版), (3), 13-18.
贾红莲.(1999).传统学方法论引论.太原:山西古籍出版社.
刘梦溪.(1996).传统的误读.石家庄:河北教育出版社.
拉依, 金澍荣等译.(1938).实验教育学.上海:商务印书馆.
卢红.(2007).教育学发展中的继承与创新.教育研究, (7), 16-21.
乔治.麦克林, 干春松, 杨凤岗译.(2000).传统与超越.北京:华夏出版社.
瞿葆奎.(1993).教育学文集.教育与教育学.北京:人民教育出版社.
滕星.(1988).中外教育名人辞典.北京:中央民族学院出版社.
王坤庆.(1991).论教育学史研究的基本问题.教师教育研究, (6), 69-74.
王坤庆.(2008).教育学史论纲.武汉:湖北教育出版社.
王坤庆.(2000).20世纪西方教育学科的发展与反思.上海:上海教育出版社.
吴康宁.(2004)."有意义的"教育思想从何而来-由教育学界"尊奉"西方话语的现象引发的思考.教育研究, (5), 19-23.
希尔斯, 傅铿, 吕乐译.(1991).论传统.上海:上海人民出版社, 15、4.
张传燧, 周卓莹.(2007).论教育传统与教育创新.大学教育科学, (3), 14-19.
Langeveld, M.J.(1958).Disintegration and Reintegration of Pedagogy.International Review of Education, (4), 55.
/
〈 |
|
〉 |