华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) >

2017 , Vol. 35 >Issue 3: 94 - 102+171

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.03.010

专题二

小学科学教师中庸思维与科学观关系的实证研究

展开
  • 1. 南京大学教育研究院, 南京 210093;
    2. 江苏第二师范学院教育科学学院, 南京 210013;
    3. 中国教育科学研究院, 北京 100088

网络出版日期: 2017-05-16

基金资助

江苏省“2011计划““基础教育人才培养模式协同创新”（南京师范大学主持）。

收起

Correlation between Zhongyong Thinking and Views of Science among Primary Science Teachers in China

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
    2.The Second Normal University in Jiangsu Nanjing 210013,China;
    3. Chinese Institute of Education Beijing 100088, China

Online published: 2017-05-16

Fold

摘要

科学教师的科学观发展深受本土文化影响。基于大样本问卷调查和结构方程模型方法，本研究初步揭示了我国小学科学教师的中庸思维与科学观之间的复杂关系：对于经典科学观，中庸思维三个因子中的“深思熟虑”和“谦让宽容”呈现正效应，而“以和为贵”则大致为负效应；而对于现代科学观，结构方程的因果模型尚难建立。对中庸思维、经典科学观和现代科学观进行的聚类分析显示，教师可分为四大群体：成熟思维群体、科学主义群体、后现代主义群体和能力欠缺群体。科学教师培训须从经典科学做起，循序渐进，对症下药。

关键词： 中庸思维; 经典科学观; 现代科学观; 后现代科学观; 科学观发展

本文引用格式

曲铭峰, 张红霞, 陆琪, 吕林海, 万东升, 郁波 . 小学科学教师中庸思维与科学观关系的实证研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017 , 35(3) : 94 -102+171 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.03.010

Abstract

Using structure equation model and other models, this study, based on a national survey of primary school science teachers in China, seeks to explore the complex correlation between teachers' [WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking and their views of science. It introduces a proxy variable of [WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking in Chinese culture into the model, while dividing views of science into the classic one and the modern one. It has been found that: (a) teachers'[WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking does not necessarily constitute an obstacle to the development of teachers' views of science; more than 1/3 of the participants developed their [WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] and science views synchronously with positive correlation co-efficient; (b)[WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking and views of science are both mutually enhanced and offset;(c) about 1/5 post-modernists had higher modern science score than the classic score, which was against the historic process of science; (d) Fourth, there is no positive correlation between [WTBX]Zhongyong[WTBZ] thinking and modern views of science. The article concludes with the suggestion that science teacher training in China should start from the stage of classic science, and give different people with different programs. Also, science education programs should be scheduled in line with the historical process instead of "skip-over development".

Key words： thinking; classic views of science; modern views of science; post-modern views of science; development of views on science

参考文献

蔡铁权,陈丽华.(2010). 当代科学本质观的文化趋向与科学教育改革.全球教育展望,39(7),83-88.
李春青.(1996). 论"中"在儒学思想中的核心位置.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),32(2),70-78.
林东升,杨中方.(2006).自我是一分为二的吗?——以西方自我图式的研究为例.心理学探新,26(3),43-47.
任继愈.(2001). 二十一世纪的中国哲学.中国哲学史, 9 (1), 5-8.
万东升. (2014).理科师范生朴素科学本质观形成机制的文化根源探讨(博士学位论文),南京:南京大学.
王轶楠、杨中芳等. (2007).小我争(护)面子和"大我"争面子导向关系探讨.西南大学学报(社会科学版),33(6),20-27.
吴佳辉,林以正.(2005).中庸思维量表的编制.本土心理学研究, (24), 255.
吴银银. (2011). 初中科学教师科学本质观的调查研究——以浙江省初中科学教师为例.全球教育展望, 40(3), 82-87.
杨中芳. (2010).中庸实践思维体系探研的初步进展.本土心理学研究, (34),3-96.
杨中芳,林升栋. (2012). 中庸实践思维体系构念图的建构效度研究.社会学研究, 26(4), 167-186.
杨中芳,赵志裕.(1997).中庸实践思维初探.第四届华人心理与行为科学学术研讨会上的发言,台北,1997年5月29-31日.
张红霞. (2003).建构主义对科学教育理论的贡献与局限.教育研究,24(7),79-84.
张红霞,万东升,郁波. (2013). 科学教师科学观十年变化及其与中庸思维的关系.苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 1 (1), 72-76.
张红霞,郁波.(2004).小学科学教师科学观调查研究.教育研究,25(11),68-73.
Basseches, M. (1980). Dialectical schemata: A framework for the empirical study of the development of dialectical thinking. Human Development, 23(6), 400-421.
Fosnacht, K. and Gonyea, R.(2012). The dependability of the NSSE 2012 pilot: A generalizability study. Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Institutional Research. New Orlean, Louisiana, June, 2012.
HKPISA Centre, (2011). The fourth HKPISA report PISA 2009: Monitoring the quality of education in Hong Kong from an international perspective. Hong Kong, Hong Kong PISA Center.
Lederman, N. G, (1999).Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice:Factors that facilitates or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916-929.
Liang, L., Chen, S., Chen, X., Kaya, O. N., Adams, A. D., Macklin, M. & Ebenezer, J. (2008). Assessing preservice elementary teachers' views on the nature of scientific knowledge. A dual-response instrument. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 1-20.
Osborne, J. F. (1996). Beyond constructivism. Science Education,80 (1), 53-82.
Osborne, J.F., Collins, S., & Ratcliffe, M. et.al. (2003). What "ideas-about-science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.
Paletz, S. B., & Peng, K. 2009. Problem finding and contradiction: Examining the relationship between naive dialectical thinking, ethnicity, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21 (2), 1-13.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741-754.
Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35 (1), 50-61.
Taiwan PISA National Center, (2011). Taiwan PISA 2009 Short Report[EB/OL]. http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/data/TaiwanPISA2009ShortReport.PDF.2016-6-13
Wan, Z. H., Wong, S.L., Wei, B. and Zhan, Y, (2013). Focusing on the classical and contemporary? Chinese science teachers' conceptions of nature of science content to be taught to pre-service science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2541-2566.
Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N. & Wang, L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 53-57.
Zhang, H. & He, H. (2012). Student perceptions of the integrated ‘science education' major in some Chinese universities. International Journal of Science Education,34 (13), 1991-2013.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉