专题:高校创业教育

信息特征和调节定向对大学生创业风险决策的影响

  • 张敏 ,
  • 王敏敏
展开
  • 1. 杭州师范大学教育学院心理系, 杭州 311121;
    2. 杭州科技职业技术学院, 杭州 311402

网络出版日期: 2019-01-22

基金资助

国家社会科学基金2015年教育学重大项目"经济转型升级中的创新创业教育研究"(VIA150002)。

The Influence of Information Feature and Regulatory Orientation on Undergraduates' Entrepreneurial Risk Decisions

  • ZHANG Min ,
  • WANG Minmin
Expand
  • 1. Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China;
    2. Hangzhou Polytechnic, Hangzhou 311402, China

Online published: 2019-01-22

摘要

大学生创业风险决策过程受到个体心理调节定向和外部信息特征的影响。预防定向的大学生有规避风险的选择倾向,促进定向的大学生有面对风险的选择倾向。模糊表征下,大学生有规避风险的选择倾向;精确表征下,大学生有面对风险的选择倾向。外部信息表征与个体调节定向对风险决策存在交互作用。大学生创业教育要关注个体心理差异性和信息特征差异性,提高创业教育成效。

本文引用格式

张敏 , 王敏敏 . 信息特征和调节定向对大学生创业风险决策的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019 , 37(1) : 30 -36+165 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.004

Abstract

Undergraduates' entrepreneurial risk decisions can be influenced by individual psychological regulatory focus and external information feature. Prevention-oriented undergraduates have the tendency to mitigate risks, while promotion-oriented undergraduates tend to face risks. Under fuzzy representation, undergraduates have the preference for mitigating risks, while they tend to face the risks under precise representation. External information feature and individual physical regulatory orientation interactively affect risk decisions. Entrepreneurship education in higher education institutions should focus on individual psychological diversity and information feature diversity, improving effectiveness of entrepreneurship education.

参考文献

段锦云.(2008).基于认知惰性的创业风险决策框架效应双维认知机制研究.杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文.
麦可思研究院.(2017).2017年中国大学生就业报告.取自:http://baike.sogou.com/v164959457.htm.
清华大学二十国集团创业研究中心.(2018).全球创业观察(GEM)2016/2017中国报告.取自:http://www.sohu.com/a/219753985_696731.
王鉴忠,等.(2017).全球创业观察(GEM)项目研究回顾与展望.辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),45(5),71-82.
姚琦,乐国安,伍承聪,李燕飞,陈晨.(2008).调节定向的测量维度及其问卷的信度和效度检验.应用心理学,14(4),318-323.
张凤华,方侠辉,刘书培.(2015).决策框架和调节定向对模糊规避的影响.中国临床心理学杂志,23(6),963-967.
张敏,王敏敏.(2017).大学生就业/创业的抉择:基于调节定向与信息框架效应的视角.高等教育研究,38(9),78-83.
Aidis, R., Estrin, S., &Mickiewicz, T. (2008).Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia:A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6),656-672.
Arenius, P., &Clercq, D. D.(2005).A Network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small Business Economics, 24(3),249-265.
Brixy, U., Sternberg, R.,&Stüber, H. (2013).Why some nascent entrepreneurs do not seek professional assistance. Applied Economics Letters, 20(2),157-161.
Friedman,R. S., &Forster, J. (2001).The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013.
Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A.(2001).Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success:Promotion prideversus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23.
Keren, G., &Gerritsen, L. E. M. (1999). On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychologica, 103,149-172.
Kramer, K. M., &Budescu, D.V. (2005). Exploring ellsberg's paradox in vague-vague cases. In Zwick, R., & Rapoport, A. (eds). Experimental business research, vol. 3. Norwell:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 131-154.
Molden,D.C.,&Finkel, E.J. (2010).Motivations for promotion and prevention and the role of trust and commitment in interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (2),255-268.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1981).The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 (4481),453-458.
文章导航

/