教育法治:教育主体法律地位

教育法视野中的未成年学生监护人

  • 姚建龙 ,
  • 刘悦
展开
  • 1. 鲁东大学教育科学学院,山东烟台,264011
    2. 上海社会科学院法学研究所,上海,200020

网络出版日期: 2021-01-18

On the Guardian of the Minor Student from the Perspective of Education Law

  • Jianlong Yao ,
  • Yue Liu
Expand
  • 1. School of Educational Science of Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong Province, 264011, China
    2. Institute of Law of Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai, 200020, China

Online published: 2021-01-18

摘要

尽管未成年学生监护人是教育法律关系中的直接利益相关者与不可或缺的角色,但是教育基本法却并未给予其应有的关注与地位。未成年学生监护人的教育权具有权利与义务二重属性,在强调监护人教育权义务属性的同时不能忽视其权利属性。相对国家教育权(主要透过学校教育来实现)而言,监护人教育权无疑居于从属性地位,但不能因此而漠视监护人的教育权。近些年来,监护人教育权意识的不断提升以及某些具体“抗争”,开始让学校教育有些无所适从。教育法规应对监护人教育权与国家教育权、学校教育权的边界作进一步明晰。

本文引用格式

姚建龙 , 刘悦 . 教育法视野中的未成年学生监护人[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021 , 39(1) : 69 -77 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.01.006

Abstract

The guardian of the minor student is a direct stakeholder and plays an indispensable role in the legal relationship of education, but the basic law on education has not paid enough attention to such an issue and the status it deserves. The education by the guardian of the minor student has dual attributes of rights and obligations, so the side of rights should not be neglected when the other side of obligations is emphasized. Compared with the educating power of the state (which is mainly realized through school education), the guardian’s educating right is undoubtedly subordinate, but the latter cannot be ignored. In recent years, both the awareness-raising and the “struggle” of guardians’ educating right have exerted a negative impact on school education. Educational laws and regulations should draw a clear line between guardian’s educating right, state’s educating right and school’s educating right in the future.

参考文献

null 高君智.(编). (2011). 教育法学. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社.
null 贺春兰. 家校关系: 舆论诉求与回应建议——从舆论视野看我国家校关系的演进和趋势. 教育科学研究, (2019). (7), 26- 28.
null 梁慧星. (2017). 民法总论(第五版). 北京: 法律出版社.
null 潘世钦. (2010). 教育法学. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社.
null 申素平. (2009). 教育法学: 原理规范与应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
null 孙霄兵、马雷军. (2017). 教育法理学. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
null 王竹青、杨科. (2010). 监护制度比较研究. 北京: 知识产权出版社.
null 杨启光. (2015). 学校教育变革中的家庭参与问题研究. 南京: 河海大学出版社.
null 尹力.(编). (2012). 教育法学. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
null 袁兆春、宋超群. (2014). 教育法学(修订版). 济南: 山东人民出版社.
null 张鸿巍. 国家亲权法则的衍变及其发展. 青少年犯罪问题, (2013). (5), 88- 93.
null 张维平、石连海.(编). (2008). 教育法学. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
null 筑波大学教育学研究会.(编). (2003). 现代教育学基础(钟启泉译). 上海: 上海教育出版社.
null De Carvalho, M. E. (2000). Rethinking family-school relations: A critique of parental involvement in schooling. Routledge.
null Dwyer, J. G. & Peters, S. F. (2019). Homeschooling: The history and philosophy of a controversial practice. University of Chicago Press.
null Levesque, R.J.R. (2018). Parental rights. In: Levesque R.J.R. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33228-4_719
null Lundy, L. & O’Lynn, P. (2019). The education rights of children. International human rights of children.
null Ray, B. D. (2017). A description and brief history of home schooling in America. The Wiley Handbook of School Choice, 259-276.
null Reich, R. Testing the boundaries of parental authority over education: The case of homeschooling. Nomos, (2002). (43), 275- 313.
null Schmitt, M. & Lydia K. The influence of family-school relations on academic success. Journal for Educational Research Online 2.1, (2010). 145- 167.
null Wenneborg, E. G. Homeschooling: The history and philosophy of a controversial practice. Educational Theory, (2019). 69 (6), 752- 758.
null Willemse, T. M., Thompson, I., Vanderlinde, R. & Mutton, Trevor. Family-school partnerships: A challenge for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, (2018). 44 (3), 252- 257.
文章导航

/