录用日期: 2021-11-15
网络出版日期: 2022-09-29
基金资助
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“设计思维视域下面向职前教师信息化教学能力发展的教学改革研究”(18YJC880060)
What is University Teachers’ Scholarship Ability of Teaching and Learning: Connotation and Development Path
Accepted date: 2021-11-15
Online published: 2022-09-29
大学教师的教学学术能力是指为了促进学生深度学习和学科素养发展,教师能运用恰当方法对教与学问题进行研究,将研究结果作用于教学活动,同时公开分享供同行评价和建构的一种实践性知能结构体。教学学术能力不仅包括专门的学术知识和学术能力,还涵盖由“学科内容—教学法”融通转化的学科教学能力,其核心是课程开发和教学设计能力。教学学术能力凸显出鲜明的实践性、融合性和发展性特征。教学学术能力与学科学术能力、教育研究能力、学术性教学能力既相互联系又互有区别。大学教师教学学术能力的提升路径包括:一是构建结构模型——教学学术能力发展的连续统;二是注重反思性实践——教学学术能力发展的源头活水;三是推进行动研究——教学学术能力发展的必由之路。
刘喆 . 什么是大学教师“教学学术能力”:内涵与发展路径[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022 , 40(10) : 54 -64 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.10.005
Scholarship ability of teaching and learning is a kind of practical expertise structure that teachers can use appropriate methods to study teaching and learning problems, apply the research results to teaching activities, and public sharing for community evaluation and construction, in order to promote students’ deep learning and discipline literacy development. It not only has specialized scholarship knowledge and ability, but also includes pedagogical content ability transformed by the combination of content knowledge and pedagogics among which the ability of curriculum development and teaching design is the core. Scholarship ability of teaching and learning highlights distinctive practical, integrative and developmental. It is related to and different from discipline scholarship ability, educational research ability and scholarly teaching ability. The ways to improve university teachers’ scholarship ability of teaching and learning include constructing the development model, attaching importance to reflective practice, and promoting action research.
null | 阿尔合尔, 霍利, 卡斯滕. (2002). 教师行动研究——教师发现之旅(黄宇, 陈晓霞, 阎宝华等译). 北京: 中国轻工业出版社. |
null | 陈红, 周萍. (2015). 教学学术能力: 青年教师教学发展的理性诉求. 教育探索, (4), 124- 126. |
null | 谷木荣. (2018). 高校青年教师教学学术能力发展的现实困境与实现路径. 当代教育科学, (11), 65- 68. |
null | 冯军. (2010). 论大学教学学术的培育. 教育发展研究, (7), 34- 38. |
null | 洪明. (2004). “反思实践”思想及其在教师教育中的争议——来自舍恩、舒尔曼和范斯特马切尔的争论. 比较教育研究, (10), 1- 5. |
null | 李悦. (2017). 大学教师教学学术能力结构模型的构建. 青海: 青海师范大学硕士论文. |
null | 李志河, 刘芷秀, 聂建文. (2020). 高校在线教师教学学术能力的评价指标体系构建. 远程教育杂志, (5), 81- 89. |
null | 刘刚, 蔡辰梅, 刘娜. (2020). 大学教师教学学术能力的类型化特征及其比较分析. 江苏高教, (4), 22- 29. |
null | 曲霞, 宋小舟. (2016). 高校教学名师的科教融合理念与实践——基于教学名师与普通教师调查问卷的对比分析. 中国高教研究, (6), 97- 104. |
null | 王岚, 王永会, 计然. (2018). 教学学术能力视域下高校教师教学培训改革研究. 河北科技大学学报(社会科学版), 18 (1), 95- 100+107. |
null | 王玉衡. (2012). 美国大学教学学术运动. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社. |
null | 徐红, 董泽芳. (2011). 我国专家型教师研究的回顾与展望. 课程?教材?教法, 31 (7), 82- 87. |
null | 徐萍. (2016). 高校教学学术能力的构成及其发展研究. 教师教育研究, 28 (5), 18- 23. |
null | 杨青. (2018). 地方本科高校教师教学学术能力提升研究. 太原: 山西大学硕士论文. |
null | 中华人民共和国教育部. (2008). 教育部财政部关于表彰第四届高等学校教学名师奖获奖教师的决定. 取自中华人民共和国教育部网站(2008年8月28日): http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/gk_gbgg/moe_0/moe_1964/moe_2431/tnull_39087.html. |
null | 中华人民共和国教育部. (2018). 教育部办公厅中共中央组织部办公厅关于组织开展2018年国家“万人计划”教学名师遴选工作的通知. 取自中华人民共和国教育部网站(2008年8月3日): http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7011/201808/t20180807_344606.html. |
null | 周光礼, 马海泉. (2013). 教学学术能力: 大学教师发展与评价的新框架. 教育研究, (8), 37- 47. |
null | 周萍, 陈红. (2015). 大学教师教学学术能力的建构. 高校教育管理, 9 (6), 94- 98. |
null | 周玉容, 李玉梅. (2015). 大学教师教学学术能力结构及其评价. 高教发展与评估, 31 (3), 78- 84+115. |
null | 朱炎军, 郭婧. (2019). 高校教师教学学术发展力指标体系的构建——基于德尔菲法的研究. 高教探索, (3), 110- 117. |
null | Almeida, P., Teixeira-Dias, J. J., & Medina, J. (2010). Improving the scholarship of teaching and learning through classroom research. In Lytras, M. D.(ed.). TECH-EDUCATION 2010: Technology Enhanced Learning: Quality of Teaching and Educational Reform. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. |
null | Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professorate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
null | Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., et al. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29 (1), 37- 53. |
null | Cross, K. P. (1998). Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (75), 5- 12. |
null | Draeger, J. (2013). Why bother with the scholarship of teaching and learning? InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, (8), 12—19. |
null | Gayle, B. M., Randall, N., Langley, L., & Preiss, R. (2013). Faculty learning processes: A model for moving from scholarly teaching to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1 (1), 81- 93. |
null | Hutchings, P., &Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 31 (5), 10- 15. |
null | Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. A. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71 (4), 476- 495. |
null | Ochoa, A. (2011). The scholarship of teaching: Yesterday, today, & tomorrow. The Journal of the Professoriate, 6 (1), 100- 116. |
null | Paulsen, M. B. (2001). The relation between research and the scholarship of teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (86), 19- 29. |
null | Potter, M. K., & Kustra, E. (2011). The relationship between scholarly teaching and SoTL: Models, distinctions, and clarifications. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5 (1), 1- 18. |
null | Rice, R. E.. (1991). The new American scholar: Scholarship and the purposes of the university. Metropolitan Universities:An International Forum, 1 (4), 7- 18. |
null | Richlin, L. (2001). Scholarly Teaching and the scholarship of teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (86), 57- 68. |
null | Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1- 23. |
null | Shulman, L. S. (2011). Feature Essays: The scholarship of teaching and learning: A personal account and reflection. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5 (1), 1- 7. |
null | Smith, R. (2001). Expertise and the scholarship of teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (86), 69- 78. |
null | Theall, M., & Centra, J. A. (2001). Assessing the scholarship of teaching: Valid decisions from valid evidence. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (86), 31- 43. |
null | Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research and Development, 19 (2), 155- 168. |
null | Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29 (4), 523- 536. |
null | Weston, C. B., & Mcalpine, L. (2001). Making explicit the development toward the scholarship of teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (86), 89- 97. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |