A Visual Analysis of Neuromyths in Education and Educational Inspiration

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.08.007

Abstract

Abstract:

The wealth of educational neuroscientific results has contributed to deeper development and reform in education. In the process, however, misunderstandings and misinterpretations of neuroscience results have created an obstacle that has to be addressed - “neuromyth”. The current situation of the prevalence of neuromyth in the education system has seriously affected the teaching efficiency of teachers and the development of students. The current research in this area has not attracted sufficient attention from domestic scholars. Therefore, this study summarizes and compares the literature on neuromyths published from 2012-2022 and conducts a visual analysis to point out the current status and influencing factors of neuromyths and interventions. It concludes with some educational insights and recommendations.

Key words: neuromyth, teacher education, visual analysis, educational neuroscience

Jiaxian Zhou, Zhicong Zhang, Dan Chen, Jie Shen. A Visual Analysis of Neuromyths in Education and Educational Inspiration[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023, 41(8): 63-78.

Figures/Tables 7

作者/年份	范围/人数/对象	流行率调查结果	影响因素
Ruiz-Martin et al. (2022)	西班牙/807名在职中小学教师	教师同意30.3%的神经神话，对14.8%的神经科学常识项目回答错误。只有1.1%的参与者能认出“通过精神运动练习可以提高阅读能力”的说法是错误的。只有20.2%和25.1%的参与者能够判断出关于记忆训练和多元智能的错误陈述。	性别、受教育水平、专业背景、教学层次都产生了显著差异，只有阅读神经科学书籍和论文、阅读科学期刊、拥有科学学位或拥有博士学位才能产生显著的中等差异。更多的教学年限虽然有差异，但效应量非常小。阅读普通报刊和教学期刊的习惯也没有显著差异。
Bissessar & Youssef (2021)	加勒比地区/338名在职中小学教师	三分之二的样本无法辨认出至少50%的神经神话。	性别、学校类型、教育水平和教学年限都没有显著差异；一般的脑科学知识、教师培训和在职教育神经科学培训是神经神话信仰的重要预测因素。
Craig et al. (2021)	加拿大、美国、英国等/253名在职和职前中小学教师	最普遍认同的神经神话是使教学适应学生的学习风格。	加拿大教师对神经神话回答的正确率显著高于美国；北美以外地区的教师与美国或加拿大的教师之间没有显著差异。各组正确率在教学年限、对神经科学的兴趣以及当前教学分工的人口学变量方面没有显著差异。
Krammer et al., (2021)	奥地利/255名职前教师	相信神经神话和拒绝神经神话的职前教师在学习成绩上没有实质性差异，自我报告的神经神话信仰并不能区分成绩好的和成绩差的初始师范教育学生。	—
Mahmoudi et al. (2021)	伊朗/449名大学在职和职前教师	神经神话在学生和教师中普遍存在，有8个神经神话是最普遍的。	—
Painemil et al. (2021)	西班牙、智利/99名职前幼儿教师	两国被试大多数都相信神经神话，相信五个神经神话的比例超过50%。	并没有在国别上发现显著差异。
Carter et al., (2020)	澳大利亚/1359名职前教师	在调查的15个神经神话描述中，参与者表现出对神经神话的广泛认同，正确识别神经神话的准确率仅为33.2%。	教师对脑科学的常识负向预测了更准确的神经神话得分，但影响作用不大。
Ching et al. (2020)	中国香港/968名职前教师	大多数职前教师的脑科学知识有限，并认同许多常见的神经神话，他们对在教育中应用神经科学持积极态度。	阅读科学学术期刊习惯不同的职前教师神经神话得分存在显著差异，每月阅读5次科学学术期刊的职前教师得分显著降低；一般的脑科学知识是唯一能显著地对神经神话有预测作用的因素。
Gülsün & K?seo?lu, (2020)	土耳其/146名在职生物教师	大多数生物教师对脑科学的正确知识能答对三分之一以上，但对神经神话判断正确的不超过七分之三。	—
Hughes et al. (2020)	澳大利亚/228名中小幼教师	超过50%的样本相信15个神经神话中的7个。	男性教师相信神经神话的比例低于女性教师；研究生学历的教师相信神经神话的比例显著最低；教学年限和教学地区都没有显著的差异。
Idrissi et al. (2020)	摩洛哥/330名在职小学教师	有一半的教师相信12个神经神话中的9个。	脑科学知识充足会减少对神经神话的认可；女性教师比男性教师更容易相信神经神话；理科教师比其他学科教师更不相信神经神话。
Tovazzi et al. (2020)	意大利/174名在职中小幼学教师	教师对神经神话的平均接受度达到了约40%，其中关于学习科学的神经神话达到了92%。	—
van Dijk & Lane (2020)	美国/169名教育领导者、大学教师和在职、职前中小学教师	受访者只对三分之一的神经神话做出了正确回答。最常被误解的神话与提高识字能力的运动协调练习、右脑-左脑神话和学习风格有关。	大学教师的神经神话识别率要显著高于其他类型的教育者，其他类型教育者组别之间没有显著差异。
Grospietsch & Mayer (2019)	德国/550名职前理科教师	超过50%的职前理科教师认可11个神经神话中的10个。对学习风格的存在（93%）和脑力训练的有效性（92%）的信念是最普遍的。	对神经神话的认可在很大程度上与教师的专业知识无关，也与关于学习科学和神经科学的学习信念无关，无论这种信念是来自于理论还是来自于自己的学习经历。
Sarrasin et al. (2019)	加拿大/972名中小幼教师	大多数教师同意“学习风格”“多元智力”和“大脑半球优势”的说法。	教师的神经神话获取来源主要是大学教育、直觉和基于教学经验的感知。拥有硕士或博士学位的教师似乎并不比只接受过初步培训的同事更少相信神经神话；幼儿园的教师比小学和中学教师更倾向于相信神经神话。
Zhang et al. (2019)	中国/253名中小学校长	校长们对神经科学感兴趣，他们普遍相信神经神话。最普遍的神经神话是关于学习风格、学前儿童的丰富环境和运动改善脑功能的神话。	重点学校校长比普通学校校长更容易相信神经神话，而学历水平高的校长比学历水平低的校长更不容易相信神经神话。教学年限、学校地点或拥有脑科学的一般知识都不能预测神经神话的流行率。
Horvath et al. (2018)	英国、美国、澳大利亚/50名获奖和865名未获奖教师	这两个群体对神经神话的接受程度几乎相同。	—
Kim & Sankey (2018)	澳大利亚/1144名职前教师	在调查的五个神经神话中，97.1%的参与者相信学习风格的存在，超过80%的参与者相信三个神经神话，几乎一半的参与者相信所有五个神经神话。	教师的神经神话来源主要有自己的教师、培训讲师、教育组织/团体、商业电视广告以及自己的父母。一般神经科学知识与对神经神话的信仰之间具有一个小的正相关关系。
Ruhaak & Cook (2018)	美国/129名特殊教育职前教师	在8条神经神话中，34.8%的参与者对3.48条神经神话回答不正确，35.6%的参与者对3.56条神经神话回答正确，28.8%的参与者对2.88条神经神话回答不知道。	与学习有关的脑结构和功能信息的大学课程数量与对神经神话的准确反应之间存在正的、显著的相关。
Torres & Alvarado (2018)	厄瓜多尔/328名职前教师	平均而言，参与者未能识别56% （SD = 27%）的神经神话，并正确回答54%（SD = 25%）的常识性问题。	参与者对神经神话的信仰在性别上没有显著差异。
Canbulat & Kiriktas (2017)	土耳其/752名在职和职前教师	参与者错误地回答了31个问题中几乎50％的问题。	在职教师对神经神话的认同在性别、教学年限和教学层次上没有显著差异，参加教育神经科学研讨会或课程的在职教师判断出神经神话的比率更高；女性、学习成绩和参加教育神经科学研讨会或课程的职前教师判断出神经神话的比率更高。
Macdonald et al. (2017)	美国/598名教育工作者、234名接触神经科学多的人、 3045名普通大众	普通大众认同的神经神话数量最多（68%），教育工作者认同的数量明显较少（56%），而高神经科学接触组认同的数量更少（46%）。所有小组中最常认同的两个神经神话与学习风格和阅读障碍有关。	年龄（更年轻）、学历（有研究生学位）、接触过神经科学课程和接触过同行评议的科学，都预示着对神经神话有更准确的表现。
Papadatou-Pastou et al. (2017)	希腊/573名职前教师	职前教师认为神经科学知识对教师是有用的，在22个神话中，有8个被至少50%的参与者回答不正确。	脑科学常识更少的教师更有可能相信神经神话。研究生学历、就读的大学、阅读的科普书籍或每月阅读的书籍数量都不能预测对神经神话的判断错误。
Varas-Genestier & Ferreira ( 2017)	智利/91名中小学教师	教师有一些神经科学的一般知识，但他们也认为，7个神经神话中的83.7%是真实的，特别是那些与学习风格、脑训练和大脑半球优势有关的误解。	阅读流行的科普期刊和教师的神经科学知识都能显著预测神经神话的出现；一般的神经科学知识与神经神话的流行率存在高度的正相关。
Dündar & Gündüz (2016)	土耳其/2932名职前小学、中学数学和理科教师	神经神话在职前教师中存在普遍性。神经神话的得分因学科而异，职前理科教师中更为普遍。	职前教师的神经神话信仰在性别、年级、专业，是否阅读书籍、科学期刊和报纸因素上具有显著差异。
Ferrero et al. (2016)	西班牙/284名中小幼、职业教师	教师平均未能识别49.1%的神经神话。	女性比男性更容易相信神经神话；对大脑常识问题做出正确回答的教师也更有可能相信神经神话；虽然阅读科学杂志会减少对神经神话的信仰，但阅读教育杂志却会增加神经神话信仰。其余因素（性别、年龄、教学年限、阅读书籍、查阅网站和博客）不能预测神经神话的信仰。
Hermida et al. (2016)	阿根廷/204名幼儿教师	对教师来说，对脑记忆、可塑性和“我们只使用大脑的10%”的神话似乎并不清楚。	—
Park et al. (2016)	韩国/521名小学、初中职前教师	只有不到1%的参与者正确回答了关于学习风格的问题，只有不到10%的人对丰富学习环境、左脑或右脑的学生以及迁移效应等问题回答正确。	在认为脑科学知识非常有帮助、对脑可塑性有很多了解、通过媒体和学术文章获得脑科学知识的职前教师中，关于这四个问题的神经神话得分更高。
Deligiannidi & Howard-Jones (2015)	希腊/217名中小学教师	包括近71%的教师认为，大脑半球优势的差异有助于解释学习者之间的个体差异，97%的教师认可根据学习风格进行教学的有效性。	—
Gleichgerrcht et al. (2015)	拉丁美洲/3451名各级教师	教师对有关脑的一般陈述做出判断的平均正确率为66.7%，平均未能识别50.7%的神经神话。	在拉丁美洲中，秘鲁的神经神话流行率显著最高，其他国家不存在显著差异；教师的教育水平有显著差异，但效应较小；阅读一般科学文本和初级科学文献以及是否接触神经科学的材料对正确识别神经神话的能力没有影响；年龄与教学年限与识别神经神话的能力无关；关于脑的一般陈述与对神经神话的信念之间发现了一个小的显著正相关性。
Pei et al. (2015)	中国/238名中小学教师	华东地区的教师持有许多关于脑的神经神话和误解，其中包括大脑半球优势的差异，相信脑功能整合的协调训练，还有97%的教师认同根据学习风格进行教学的有效性。	—
Tardif et al. (2015)	瑞士/283名小学实习教师、在职高中、大学教师和教师培训师	绝大部分人同意大脑半球优势和学习风格的假设；相信“脑训练”的教师中，大部分认为这个方法受到脑研究的支持，同意它有利于学生的学习，对他们的学生使用（或打算使用）这种方法。	大学教师与高中教师对与大脑半球优势和模式优势的神经神话认同没有差异；教师比实习教师更同意“有些人更多地使用左半球—左脑，而其他人更多地使用右半球—右脑”这一事实和基于左脑和右脑功能区分的教学方法有利于学习的说法；教师比实习教师更相信大脑偏侧化优势的正确性。
Karakus et al. (2015)	土耳其/278名中小学教师	在总共32条陈述中，参与者平均正确回答了14.56条。其中，教师相信15条神经神话中的53.02%。	—
Rato et al. (2013)	葡萄牙/583名中小幼教师	在六个神经神话中，被相信较多的是左右脑半球优势、多元智力和学习风格。	—
Dekker et al. (2012)	英国、荷兰/242名中小学教师	教师相信49%的神经神话，特别是与商业化教育项目有关的迷信。15个神话中的7个被50%以上的教师所相信。	科学知识对神经神话信仰有显著的预测作用，脑科学知识得分越高的教师越有可能相信神经神话；其他因素(国家、性别、年龄、学校类型[小学/中学]，以及阅读科普书籍、科学期刊或在职培训)都无法预测神话的流行率。

文献	干预对象	人数	性别/年龄	干预形式	干预时长	干预效果
Ferreira & Rodríguez ( 2022)	职前大学教师	43	35名女性 M_age= 25.39	学习科学课程	32周，每周 2小时40分钟	长时间干预措施显著提高了职前教师的整体神经科学素养，并减少了神经神话的信念，但由于规模相对较小，神经神话陈述的可变性较高，因此效果不大。但一些最受欢迎的神经神话确实随着时间的推移出现了至少15%的明显下降。
Ruiz-Martin et al. (2022)	在职小学和中学教师	509	— —	教育神经科学在线课程	一个月，共计15小时	在培训后不久和长期内（3个月），干预措施对降低神经神话的流行率有很大影响。
Tan & Amiel ( 2022)	在职1-6年级教师	5	— —	学习研究项目	24-25小时	教师加深了对人类知识建构和理论神经科学的理解以及对神经神话的对抗。神经科学的知识可以提升教师在学习和教学法方面的科学理论。
Cui & Zhang ( 2021)	在职小学和中学教师	216	145名女性 M_age= 25.39	教育神经科学培训项目	1周	培训项目可以促进教师对教育神经科学相关知识的理解，而且教育神经科学相关知识与教师教学内容知识也有关联性。
Chang et al. (2021)	在职中小学教师	14	— —	教育神经科学概念课程	3周	在课程结束后一年进行调查，结果发现，教师一致认为，教育神经科学概念课程在他们的教学中作为组织原则是有用的，并影响了教师对学生的看法，以及课堂教学和行动。
Ferrero et al. (2020)	在职特殊教育、幼、小、中学、职业教育和从事一个以上教育层次的教师	45 研究1	40名女性 M_age= 39.08	阅读反驳文本	平均20分钟 (包括测试)	与没有被反驳的错误概念相比，当教师看到反驳文本中的错误概念时，他们对这些概念的信念显著降低。
Ferrero et al. (2020)	在职幼、小、中学教师	35 研究2	26名女性 M_age= 40.91	阅读反驳文本，30天后再测	—	反驳文本的影响是短暂的，并在30天后消失。
Howard-Jones et al. (2020)	在职教师	585	— M_age= 25.39	专业发展培训课程	90分钟	参与者对神经科学概念具有的教学价值有了更多的感知，并且在随访153人的子样本中，这种效应在6-12周后依然存在。
McMahon et al. (2019)	实习教师	130	102名女性 M_age= 25.39	“学习科学”研讨会	8个月	受训者对神经神话的信念有所下降，并转变为不确定性的反应。
Schwartz et al. (2019)	在职中小学幼儿园教师和课程专家或管理人员	14	11名女性 —	基于教育神经科学概念的暑期课程	12天，共计 36小时	教师对神经科学的理解显著提高。此外，教师在课程结束后修改他们的教案，显示出更多以学生为中心的教学方法的整合。
Friedman et al. (2019)	在职K-12教师和教育人员	80	— —	神经教育学适应项目	一个学期	该项目表明，在职教师有能力将神经科学知识应用到他们的课堂教学中，而不存在任何困难，他们表现出高度的理解力，并证明了神经科学对教育的重要性。
Tan et al. (2019)	在职小学教师	8	— —	学习研究项目	10个月	“学习研究”被证明是一种有效的教师专业发展模型，其中理论知识（如神经科学），可以在课堂环境中使用和测试，以深度支持教师的实践。这种教学与研究的关系支持探索理论知识与教育之间富有成效的联系，以推进学习和教学的科学性。
Im et al. (2018)	职前小学教师	50	女性35人 M_age= 20.86	教育心理学课程	3个月	参加教育心理学课程提高了神经科学的素养，但并没有减少对神经神话的信仰。
Anderson et al. (2018)	在职5年级数学教师	40	— —	包含神经科学转化的在线专业发展课程；7次面对面会议；月度培训	30-40小时	不同形式的教学计划有助于消除阻碍教师和学习者的神经神话。
Ergas et al. (2018)	在职中学教师	30	28名女性 29-55岁	基于脑科学理论和正念方法的教师培训	3个月，平均每次91分钟	该项目促进了教师从固定心态到成长心态的转变，教师对脑可塑的信念显著增加。
Grospietsch & Mayer ( 2018)	职前生物教师	40	— 20-32岁	“可持续学习”的大学课程，在课后接受概念反驳文本的家庭作业	3个学期，每学期14周，每周90分钟	符合专业概念改变模式的大学课程对职前生物教师在学习和脑主题上的专业知识、基于学习理论的信念和错误概念（神经神话）有积极影响。明确反驳错误观念（如通过概念改变文本）似乎是使职前教师抵制和脑主题有关的错误观念的合适方法。
Roehrig et al. (2012)	在职小、中学理科教师	107	— —	神经科学系列讲习班(BrainU项目)	一次(2周)，另外两次(各1周)，为期3年；每次工作坊后1年随访 1-3天	在BrainU项目之后，教师们对神经科学的内容知识有了显著的提高。课堂观察表明，教师不仅在他们的课程中实施了神经科学课程，而且他们采用了许多改革教学法的技术。持续的、以探究为基础的科学专业发展可以对科学教学质量产生积极影响，教师可以让学生经常参与高质量的、研究性的神经科学活动。

References 0

	陈丹, & 刘璐璐教育神经科学研究的热点、发展趋势与启示——基于CiteSpace数据可视化分析教学研究 2021 44 02 1 9 陈丹, & 刘璐璐. (2021). 教育神经科学研究的热点、发展趋势与启示—基于CiteSpace数据可视化分析. 教学研究,44(02),1—9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4634.2021.02.002
	陈巍, & 汪寅基于镜像神经元的教育: 新“神经神话”的诞生? 教育研究 2015 36 02 92 101 陈巍, & 汪寅. (2015). 基于镜像神经元的教育: 新“神经神话”的诞生?. 教育研究,36(02),92—101.
	郭文斌知识图谱: 教育文献内容可视化研究新技术华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2016 34 01 45 50+114 郭文斌. (2016). 知识图谱: 教育文献内容可视化研究新技术. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),34(01),45—50+114.
	李烨, & 叶明透视脑科学与教育研究中的“神经神话” 当代教育科学 2010 01 3 5+27 李烨, & 叶明. (2010). 透视脑科学与教育研究中的“神经神话”. 当代教育科学,(01),3—5+27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2221.2010.01.001
	武志峰神经科学知识在教育中的迷思与解蔽苏州大学学报(教育科学版) 2021 9 03 73 82 武志峰. (2021). 神经科学知识在教育中的迷思与解蔽. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版),9(03),73—82. doi: 10.19563/j.cnki.sdjk.2021.03.006
	邢强, & 张美琦教育神经科学的研究主题、困境及解决途径广州大学学报(社会科学版) 2021 20 03 94 99 邢强, & 张美琦. (2021). 教育神经科学的研究主题、困境及解决途径. 广州大学学报(社会科学版),20(03),94—99.
	意得辑. (2018). 同行评审更具包容性: 孩童担任论文审稿人. 取自: https://www.editage.cn/insights/en/node/2808
	张婧婧, 于玻, & 周加仙教育神经科学核心主题的演变——基于2007~2020年《心智、脑与教育》杂志刊发的335篇论文分析现代教育技术 2021 31 05 5 17 张婧婧, 于玻, & 周加仙. (2021). 教育神经科学核心主题的演变—基于2007~2020年《心智、脑与教育》杂志刊发的335篇论文分析. 现代教育技术,31(05),5—17.
	周加仙. (2004a). “大脑10%潜能”论断的探析. 载: 钟启泉教授. 多维视角下的教育理论与思潮. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
	周加仙. (2004b). 左右脑教育的批判. 载: 钟启泉. 多维视角下的教育理论与思潮. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
	周加仙 “神经神话”的成因分析华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2008 26 03 60 64+83 周加仙. (2008). “神经神话”的成因分析. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),26(03),60—64+83. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2008.03.003
	Anderson, R. K., Boaler, J., & Dieckmann, J. A Achieving Elusive Teacher Change through Challenging Myths about Learning: A Blended Approach Education Sciences 2018 8 3 98 Anderson, R. K., Boaler, J., & Dieckmann, J. A. (2018). Achieving Elusive Teacher Change through Challenging Myths about Learning: A Blended Approach. Education Sciences, 8(3), 98. doi: 10.3390/educsci8030098
	Ansari, D., & Coch, D Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006 10 4 146 151 Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 146—151. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.007
	Aronsson, L Reconsidering the concept of difference: A proposal to connect education and neuroscience in new ways Policy Futures in Education 2019 18 2 275 293 Aronsson, L. (2019). Reconsidering the concept of difference: A proposal to connect education and neuroscience in new ways. Policy Futures in Education, 18(2), 275—293.
	Bailey, R. P., Madigan, D. J., Cope, E., & Nicholls, A. R The prevalence of pseudoscientific ideas and neuromyths among sports coaches Frontiers in Psychology 2018 9 641 Bailey, R. P., Madigan, D. J., Cope, E., & Nicholls, A. R. (2018). The prevalence of pseudoscientific ideas and neuromyths among sports coaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 641. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00641
	Betts, K., Miller, M., Tokuhama-Espinosa, T., Shewokis, P., Anderson, A., Borja, C., Galoyan, T., Delaney, B., Eigenauer, J., & Dekker, S. (2019). International Report: Neuromyths and Evidence-Based Practices in Higher Education. Online Learning Consortium: Newburyport, MA.
	Bissessar, S., & Youssef, F. F A cross-sectional study of neuromyths among teachers in a Caribbean nation Trends in Neuroscience and Education 2021 23 100155 Bissessar, S., & Youssef, F. F. (2021). A cross-sectional study of neuromyths among teachers in a Caribbean nation. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 23, 100155. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155
	Busso, D. S., & Pollack, C. No brain left behind: consequences of neuroscience discourse for education Learning, media and technology 2015 40 2 168 186 Busso, D. S., & Pollack, C. (2015). No brain left behind: consequences of neuroscience discourse for education. Learning, media and technology, 40(2), 168—186.
	Canbulat, T., & Kiriktas, H Assessment of Educational Neuromyths among Teachers and Teacher Candidates Journal of Education and Learning 2017 6 2 326 333 Canbulat, T., & Kiriktas, H. (2017). Assessment of Educational Neuromyths among Teachers and Teacher Candidates. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(2), 326—333. doi: 10.5539/jel.v6n2p326
	Carey, L. B., Schmidt, J., Dommestrup, A. K., Pritchard, A. E., van Stone, M., Grasmick, N., Mahone, E. M., Denckla, M. B., & Jacobson, L. A. Beyond Learning About the Brain: A Situated Approach to Training Teachers in Mind, Brain, and Education Mind, Brain, and Education 2020 14 3 200 208 Carey, L. B., Schmidt, J., Dommestrup, A. K., Pritchard, A. E., van Stone, M., Grasmick, N., Mahone, E. M., Denckla, M. B., & Jacobson, L. A. (2020). Beyond Learning About the Brain: A Situated Approach to Training Teachers in Mind, Brain, and Education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(3), 200—208.
	Carter, M., Van Bergen, P., Stephenson, J., Newall, C., & Sweller, N Prevalence, predictors and sources of information regarding neuromyths in an Australian cohort of preservice teachers Australian Journal of Teacher Education 2020 45 10 95 113 Carter, M., Van Bergen, P., Stephenson, J., Newall, C., & Sweller, N. (2020). Prevalence, predictors and sources of information regarding neuromyths in an Australian cohort of preservice teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(10), 95—113. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2020v45n10.6
	Chang, Z., Schwartz, M. S., Hinesley, V., & Dubinsky, J. M Neuroscience Concepts Changed Teachers' Views of Pedagogy and Students Frontiers in Psychology 2021 12 685856 Chang, Z., Schwartz, M. S., Hinesley, V., & Dubinsky, J. M. (2021). Neuroscience Concepts Changed Teachers' Views of Pedagogy and Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 685856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685856
	Ching, F. N. Y., So, W. W. M., Lo, S. K., & Wong, S. W. H Preservice Teachers' Neuroscience Literacy and Perceptions of Neuroscience in Education: Implications for Teacher Education Trends in Neuroscience and Education 2020 21 100144 Ching, F. N. Y., So, W. W. M., Lo, S. K., & Wong, S. W. H. (2020). Preservice Teachers' Neuroscience Literacy and Perceptions of Neuroscience in Education: Implications for Teacher Education. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 21, 100144. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100144
	Craig, H. L., Wilcox, G., Makarenko, E. M., & MacMaster, F. P Continued Educational Neuromyth Belief in Pre- and In-Service Teachers: A Call for De-Implementation Action for School Psychologists Canadian Journal of School Psychology 2021 36 2 127 141 Craig, H. L., Wilcox, G., Makarenko, E. M., & MacMaster, F. P. (2021). Continued Educational Neuromyth Belief in Pre- and In-Service Teachers: A Call for De-Implementation Action for School Psychologists. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 36(2), 127—141. doi: 10.1177/0829573520979605
	Cui, Y., & Zhang, H Educational Neuroscience Training for Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Construction Frontiers in Psychology 2021 12 792723 Cui, Y., & Zhang, H. (2021). Educational Neuroscience Training for Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Construction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 792723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792723
	Dekker, H. D., & Kim, J. A. (2022). Mechanisms of Propagation and Factors Contributing to Beliefs in Neuromyths. In D. H. Robinson, V. X. Yan, & J. A. Kim (Eds. ), Learning Styles, Classroom Instruction, and Student Achievement (pp. 21−37). Springer International Publishing.
	Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P. A., & Jolles, J Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers Frontiers in Psychology 2012 3 429 429 Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P. A., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 429—429.
	Deligiannidi, K., & Howard-Jones, P. A The Neuroscience Literacy of Teachers in Greece Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015 174 3909 3915 Deligiannidi, K., & Howard-Jones, P. A. (2015). The Neuroscience Literacy of Teachers in Greece. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3909—3915. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1133
	Devonshire, I. M., & Dommett, E. J. Neuroscience: viable applications in education? Neuroscientist 2010 16 4 349 356 Devonshire, I. M., & Dommett, E. J. (2010). Neuroscience: viable applications in education?. Neuroscientist, 16(4), 349—356.
	Dubinsky, J. M., Guzey, S. S., Schwartz, M. S., Roehrig, G., Macnabb, C., Schmied, A., Hinesley, V., Hoelscher, M., Michlin, M., & Schmitt, L. (2019). Contributions of Neuroscience Knowledge to Teachers and Their Practice. The Neuroscientist, 107385841983544.
	Dündar, S., & Gündüz, N. Misconceptions regarding the brain: The neuromyths of preservice teachers Mind, Brain, and Education 2016 10 4 212 232 Dündar, S., & Gündüz, N. (2016). Misconceptions regarding the brain: The neuromyths of preservice teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(4), 212—232.
	Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2013 14 1 4 58 Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4—58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266
	Düvel, N., Wolf, A., & Kopiez, R Neuromyths in music education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers and students Frontiers in Psychology 2017 8 629 Düvel, N., Wolf, A., & Kopiez, R. (2017). Neuromyths in music education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers and students. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00629
	Ergas, O., Hadar, L. L., Albelda, N., & Levit-Binnun, N Contemplative Neuroscience as a Gateway to Mindfulness: Findings from an Educationally Framed Teacher Learning Program Mindfulness 2018 9 6 1723 1735 Ergas, O., Hadar, L. L., Albelda, N., & Levit-Binnun, N. (2018). Contemplative Neuroscience as a Gateway to Mindfulness: Findings from an Educationally Framed Teacher Learning Program. Mindfulness, 9(6), 1723—1735. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-0913-4
	Ferreira, R. A., & Rodríguez, C Effect of a Science of Learning Course on Beliefs in Neuromyths and Neuroscience Literacy Brain Sciences 2022 12 7 811 Ferreira, R. A., & Rodríguez, C. (2022). Effect of a Science of Learning Course on Beliefs in Neuromyths and Neuroscience Literacy. Brain Sciences, 12(7), 811. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12070811
	Ferrero, M., Garaizar, P., & Vadillo, M. A Neuromyths in education: Prevalence among Spanish teachers and an exploration of cross-cultural variation Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2016 10 496 Ferrero, M., Garaizar, P., & Vadillo, M. A. (2016). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence among Spanish teachers and an exploration of cross-cultural variation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 496.
	Ferrero, M., Hardwicke, T. E., Konstantinidis, E., & Vadillo, M. A The effectiveness of refutation texts to correct misconceptions among educators Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied 2020 26 3 411 421 Ferrero, M., Hardwicke, T. E., Konstantinidis, E., & Vadillo, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of refutation texts to correct misconceptions among educators. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 26(3), 411—421. doi: 10.1037/xap0000258
	Fischer, K. W., Goswami, U., & Geake, J. The future of educational neuroscience Mind, Brain, and Education 2010 4 2 68 80 Fischer, K. W., Goswami, U., & Geake, J. (2010). The future of educational neuroscience. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(2), 68—80.
	Friedman, I. A., Grobgeld, E., & Teichman-Weinberg, A Imbuing Education with Brain Research Can Improve Teaching and Enhance Productive Learning Psychology 2019 10 02 122 Friedman, I. A., Grobgeld, E., & Teichman-Weinberg, A. (2019). Imbuing Education with Brain Research Can Improve Teaching and Enhance Productive Learning. Psychology, 10(02), 122. doi: 10.4236/psych.2019.102010
	Gleichgerrcht, E., Lira Luttges, B., Salvarezza, F., & Campos, A. L. Educational neuromyths among teachers in Latin America Mind, Brain, and Education 2015 9 3 170 178 Gleichgerrcht, E., Lira Luttges, B., Salvarezza, F., & Campos, A. L. (2015). Educational neuromyths among teachers in Latin America. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(3), 170—178.
	Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments CBE—Life Sciences Education 2012 11 4 364 377 Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364—377.
	Goswami, U. Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2006 7 5 406 413 Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: from research to practice?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(5), 406—413.
	Grospietsch, F., & Lins, I Review on the Prevalence and Persistence of Neuromyths in Education – Where We Stand and What Is Still Needed Frontiers in Education 2021 6 665752 Grospietsch, F., & Lins, I. (2021). Review on the Prevalence and Persistence of Neuromyths in Education – Where We Stand and What Is Still Needed. Frontiers in Education, 6, 665752. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.665752
	Grospietsch, F., & Mayer, J Professionalizing pre-service biology teachers' misconceptions about learning and the brain through conceptual change Education Sciences 2018 8 3 120 Grospietsch, F., & Mayer, J. (2018). Professionalizing pre-service biology teachers' misconceptions about learning and the brain through conceptual change. Education Sciences, 8(3), 120. doi: 10.3390/educsci8030120
	Grospietsch, F., & Mayer, J Pre-service Science Teachers' Neuroscience Literacy: Neuromyths and a Professional Understanding of Learning and Memory Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2019 13 20 Grospietsch, F., & Mayer, J. (2019). Pre-service Science Teachers' Neuroscience Literacy: Neuromyths and a Professional Understanding of Learning and Memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 20. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00020
	Gülsün, Y., & Köseoğlu, P Determining Biology Teachers' Neuromyths and Knowledge About Brain Functions Education and Science 2020 45 204 303 316 Gülsün, Y., & Köseoğlu, P. (2020). Determining Biology Teachers' Neuromyths and Knowledge About Brain Functions. Education and Science, 45(204), 303—316.
	Hermida, M. J., Segretin, M. S., Soni García, A., & Lipina, S. J Conceptions and misconceptions about neuroscience in preschool teachers: a study from Argentina Educational Research 2016 58 4 457 472 Hermida, M. J., Segretin, M. S., Soni García, A., & Lipina, S. J. (2016). Conceptions and misconceptions about neuroscience in preschool teachers: a study from Argentina. Educational Research, 58(4), 457—472. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2016.1238585
	Hook, C. J., & Farah, M. J. Neuroscience for educators: what are they seeking, and what are they finding? Neuroethics 2013 6 2 331 341 Hook, C. J., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Neuroscience for educators: what are they seeking, and what are they finding?. Neuroethics, 6(2), 331—341.
	Horvath, J. C., Donoghue, G. M., Horton, A. J., Lodge, J. M., & Hattie, J. A On the irrelevance of neuromyths to teacher effectiveness: comparing neuro-literacy levels amongst award-winning and non-award winning teachers Frontiers in Psychology 2018 9 1666 Horvath, J. C., Donoghue, G. M., Horton, A. J., Lodge, J. M., & Hattie, J. A. (2018). On the irrelevance of neuromyths to teacher effectiveness: comparing neuro-literacy levels amongst award-winning and non-award winning teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1666. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01666
	Howard-Jones, & Paul, A Neuroscience and education: myths and messages Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2014 15 12 817 Howard-Jones, & Paul, A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817. doi: 10.1038/nrn3817
	Howard-Jones, P. A., Jay, T., & Galeano, L. Professional Development on the Science of Learning and teachers’ Performative Thinking—A Pilot Study Mind, Brain, and Education 2020 14 3 267 278 Howard-Jones, P. A., Jay, T., & Galeano, L. (2020). Professional Development on the Science of Learning and teachers’ Performative Thinking—A Pilot Study. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(3), 267—278.
	Hughes, B., Sullivan, K. A., & Gilmore, L. Why do teachers believe educational neuromyths? Trends in Neuroscience and Education 2020 21 100145 Hughes, B., Sullivan, K. A., & Gilmore, L. (2020). Why do teachers believe educational neuromyths?. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 21, 100145.
	Idrissi, A. J., Alami, M., Lamkaddem, A., & Souirti, Z Brain knowledge and predictors of neuromyths among teachers in Morocco Trends in Neuroscience and Education 2020 20 100135 Idrissi, A. J., Alami, M., Lamkaddem, A., & Souirti, Z. (2020). Brain knowledge and predictors of neuromyths among teachers in Morocco. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 20, 100135. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100135
	Im, S., Cho, J., Dubinsky, J. M., & Varma, S Taking an educational psychology course improves neuroscience literacy but does not reduce belief in neuromyths Plos One 2018 13 2 e0192163 Im, S., Cho, J., Dubinsky, J. M., & Varma, S. (2018). Taking an educational psychology course improves neuroscience literacy but does not reduce belief in neuromyths. Plos One, 13(2), e0192163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192163
	Jolles, J., & Jolles, D. D On Neuroeducation: Why and How to Improve Neuroscientific Literacy in Educational Professionals Frontiers in Psychology 2021 12 752151 Jolles, J., & Jolles, D. D. (2021). On Neuroeducation: Why and How to Improve Neuroscientific Literacy in Educational Professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 752151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752151
	Karakus, O., Howard-Jones, P. A., & Jay, T Primary and Secondary School Teachers’ Knowledge and Misconceptions about the Brain in Turkey Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015 174 1933 1940 Karakus, O., Howard-Jones, P. A., & Jay, T. (2015). Primary and Secondary School Teachers’ Knowledge and Misconceptions about the Brain in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1933—1940. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.858
	Kim, M., & Sankey, D Philosophy, neuroscience and pre-service teachers’ beliefs in neuromyths: A call for remedial action Educational Philosophy and Theory 2018 50 13 1214 1227 Kim, M., & Sankey, D. (2018). Philosophy, neuroscience and pre-service teachers’ beliefs in neuromyths: A call for remedial action. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(13), 1214—1227. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2017.1395736
	Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K Reducing students’ misconceptions with refutational teaching: For long-term retention, comprehension matters Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 2017 3 2 90 Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2017). Reducing students’ misconceptions with refutational teaching: For long-term retention, comprehension matters. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(2), 90. doi: 10.1037/stl0000082
	Krammer, G., Vogel, S. E., & Grabner, R. H. Believing in Neuromyths Makes Neither a Bad Nor Good Student‐Teacher: The Relationship between Neuromyths and Academic Achievement in Teacher Education Mind, Brain, and Education 2021 15 1 54 60 Krammer, G., Vogel, S. E., & Grabner, R. H. (2021). Believing in Neuromyths Makes Neither a Bad Nor Good Student‐Teacher: The Relationship between Neuromyths and Academic Achievement in Teacher Education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(1), 54—60.
	Leibbrand, J. A., & Watson, B. H. (2010). The road less traveled: How the developmental sciences can prepare educators to improve student achievement: Policy recommendation. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
	Lindell, A. K., & Kidd, E. Why right-brain teaching is half-witted: A critique of the misapplication of neuroscience to education Mind, Brain, and Education 2011 5 3 121 127 Lindell, A. K., & Kidd, E. (2011). Why right-brain teaching is half-witted: A critique of the misapplication of neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(3), 121—127.
	Luiz, I., Lindell, A. K., & Ekuni, R Neurophilia is stronger for educators than students in Brazil Trends in Neuroscience and Education 2020 20 100136 Luiz, I., Lindell, A. K., & Ekuni, R. (2020). Neurophilia is stronger for educators than students in Brazil. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 20, 100136. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100136
	Macdonald, K., Germine, L., Anderson, A., Christodoulou, J., & McGrath, L. M Dispelling the myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths Frontiers in Psychology 2017 8 1314 Macdonald, K., Germine, L., Anderson, A., Christodoulou, J., & McGrath, L. M. (2017). Dispelling the myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
	MacMahon, S., Leggett, J., & Carroll, A. Partnering to Learn: A Collaborative Approach to Research Translation for Educators and Researchers Mind, Brain, and Education 2022 16 2 79 88 MacMahon, S., Leggett, J., & Carroll, A. (2022). Partnering to Learn: A Collaborative Approach to Research Translation for Educators and Researchers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 16(2), 79—88.
	Mahmoudi, K. A. A., Nouri, A., & Talkhabi, M Identifying the prevalence of neuromyths among teacher-students of Frahangian University of Iran Quartely Journal of Teacher Education 2021 4 1 29 54 Mahmoudi, K. A. A., Nouri, A., & Talkhabi, M. (2021). Identifying the prevalence of neuromyths among teacher-students of Frahangian University of Iran. Quartely Journal of Teacher Education, 4(1), 29—54.
	McMahon, K., Yeh, C. S. H., & Etchells, P. J. The Impact of a Modified Initial Teacher Education on Challenging Trainees’ Understanding of Neuromyths Mind, Brain, and Education 2019 13 4 288 297 McMahon, K., Yeh, C. S. H., & Etchells, P. J. (2019). The Impact of a Modified Initial Teacher Education on Challenging Trainees’ Understanding of Neuromyths. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(4), 288—297.
	OECD. (2002). Understanding the brain: Towards a new learning science. OECD.
	OECD. (2007). Understanding the brain: The birth of a learning science. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
	Oreskes, N. (2019). Science Isn’t Always Perfect, But We Should Still Trust It. Time. https://time.com/5709691/why-trust-science/.
	Özdoğru, A. A., & Balatekin, N Neuromyths as a Challenge and Opportunity for the Learning and Teaching of Neuroscience Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi 2018 7 4 483 494 Özdoğru, A. A., & Balatekin, N. (2018). Neuromyths as a Challenge and Opportunity for the Learning and Teaching of Neuroscience. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 7(4), 483—494.
	Painemil, M., Manquenahuel, S., Biso, P., & Muñoz, C Beliefs Versus Knowledge in Trainee Teachers A Compared Study of Neuromyths at an International Level. Revista Electrónica Educare 2021 25 1 246 267 Painemil, M., Manquenahuel, S., Biso, P., & Muñoz, C. (2021). Beliefs Versus Knowledge in Trainee Teachers. A Compared Study of Neuromyths at an International Level. Revista Electrónica Educare, 25(1), 246—267.
	Papadatou-Pastou, M., Haliou, E., & Vlachos, F Brain knowledge and the prevalence of neuromyths among prospective teachers in Greece Frontiers in Psychology 2017 8 804 Papadatou-Pastou, M., Haliou, E., & Vlachos, F. (2017). Brain knowledge and the prevalence of neuromyths among prospective teachers in Greece. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804
	Park, S., Park, J., Lee, S., & Shin, J Prevalence and Predictors of Neuromyth Among Pre-service Teachers Korean Journal of Teacher Education 2016 32 2 185 212 Park, S., Park, J., Lee, S., & Shin, J. (2016). Prevalence and Predictors of Neuromyth Among Pre-service Teachers. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 185—212. doi: 10.14333/KJTE.2016.32.2.185
	Pasquinelli, E. Neuromyths: Why do they exist and persist? Mind, Brain, and Education 2012 6 2 89 96 Pasquinelli, E. (2012). Neuromyths: Why do they exist and persist?. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(2), 89—96.
	Pei, X., Howard-Jones, P. A., Zhang, S., Liu, X., & Jin, Y Teachers’ Understanding about the Brain in East China Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015 174 3681 3688 Pei, X., Howard-Jones, P. A., Zhang, S., Liu, X., & Jin, Y. (2015). Teachers’ Understanding about the Brain in East China. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3681—3688. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1091
	Pickering, S. J., & Howard Jones, P. Educators’ views on the role of neuroscience in education: Findings from a study of UK and international perspectives Mind, Brain, and Education 2007 1 3 109 113 Pickering, S. J., & Howard Jones, P. (2007). Educators’ views on the role of neuroscience in education: Findings from a study of UK and international perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(3), 109—113.
	Potvin, P., Malenfant-Robichaud, G., Cormier, C., & Masson, S Coexistence of Misconceptions and Scientific Conceptions in Chemistry Professors: A Mental Chronometry and fMRI Study Frontiers in Education 2020 5 542458 Potvin, P., Malenfant-Robichaud, G., Cormier, C., & Masson, S. (2020). Coexistence of Misconceptions and Scientific Conceptions in Chemistry Professors: A Mental Chronometry and fMRI Study. Frontiers in Education, 5, 542458. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.542458
	Privitera, A. J A scoping review of research on neuroscience training for teachers Trends in Neuroscience and Education 2021 24 100157 Privitera, A. J. (2021). A scoping review of research on neuroscience training for teachers. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 24, 100157. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2021.100157
	Rato, J. R., Abreu, A. M., & Castro-Caldas, A. Neuromyths in education: what is fact and what is fiction for Portuguese teachers? Educational Research 2013 55 4 441 453 Rato, J. R., Abreu, A. M., & Castro-Caldas, A. (2013). Neuromyths in education: what is fact and what is fiction for Portuguese teachers?. Educational Research, 55(4), 441—453.
	Rincón, A. N., López, M. J. C., Galvis, C. A. S., & Navarro, L. I Neurodidactics of Languages: Neuromyths in Multilingual Learners Mathematics 2022 10 2 196 Rincón, A. N., López, M. J. C., Galvis, C. A. S., & Navarro, L. I. (2022). Neurodidactics of Languages: Neuromyths in Multilingual Learners. Mathematics, 10(2), 196. doi: 10.3390/math10020196
	Ritchie, S., Chudler, E., & Sala, S. (2012). Don’t try this at school: The attraction of ‘alternative’ educational techniques. In S. D. Sala & M. Anderson (Eds.), Neuroscience in Education: The good, the bad, and the ugly (pp. 244−265). Oxford University Press.
	Roehrig, G. H., Michlin, M., Schmitt, L., MacNabb, C., & Dubinsky, J. M Teaching Neuroscience to Science Teachers: Facilitating the Translation of Inquiry-Based Teaching Instruction to the Classroom CBE—Life Sciences Education 2012 11 4 413 424 Roehrig, G. H., Michlin, M., Schmitt, L., MacNabb, C., & Dubinsky, J. M. (2012). Teaching Neuroscience to Science Teachers: Facilitating the Translation of Inquiry-Based Teaching Instruction to the Classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 413—424.
	Rousseau, L. (2021). Interventions to Dispel Neuromyths in Educational Settings—A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
	Ruhaak, A. E., & Cook, B. G. The prevalence of educational neuromyths among pre-service special education teachers Mind, Brain, and Education 2018 12 3 155 161 Ruhaak, A. E., & Cook, B. G. (2018). The prevalence of educational neuromyths among pre-service special education teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 12(3), 155—161.
	Ruiz-Martin, H., Portero-Tresserra, M., Martínez-Molina, A., & Ferrero, M Tenacious Educational Neuromyths: Prevalence Among Teachers and an Intervention Trends in Neuroscience and Education 2022 29 100192 Ruiz-Martin, H., Portero-Tresserra, M., Martínez-Molina, A., & Ferrero, M. (2022). Tenacious Educational Neuromyths: Prevalence Among Teachers and an Intervention. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 29, 100192. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2022.100192
	Sarrasin, J. B., Riopel, M., & Masson, S. Neuromyths and their origin among teachers in Quebec Mind, Brain, and Education 2019 13 2 100 109 Sarrasin, J. B., Riopel, M., & Masson, S. (2019). Neuromyths and their origin among teachers in Quebec. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(2), 100—109.
	Schwartz, M. S., Hinesley, V., Chang, Z., & Dubinsky, J. M Neuroscience knowledge enriches pedagogical choices Teaching and Teacher Education 2019 83 87 98 Schwartz, M. S., Hinesley, V., Chang, Z., & Dubinsky, J. M. (2019). Neuroscience knowledge enriches pedagogical choices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 87—98. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.002
	Society for Neuroscience. (2009). The promise of interdisciplinary partnerships between brain sciences and education. University of California at Irvine.
	Sullivan, K. A., Hughes, B., & Gilmore, L. Measuring Educational Neuromyths: Lessons for Future Research Mind, Brain, and Education 2021 15 3 232 238 Sullivan, K. A., Hughes, B., & Gilmore, L. (2021). Measuring Educational Neuromyths: Lessons for Future Research. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(3), 232—238.
	Tan, Y. S. M., Amiel, J. J., & Yaro, K Developing theoretical coherence in teaching and learning: case of neuroscience-framed learning study International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 2019 8 3 229 243 Tan, Y. S. M., Amiel, J. J., & Yaro, K. (2019). Developing theoretical coherence in teaching and learning: case of neuroscience-framed learning study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(3), 229—243. doi: 10.1108/IJLLS-10-2018-0072
	Tan, Y. S. M., & Amiel, J. J Teachers learning to apply neuroscience to classroom instruction: case of professional development in British Columbia Professional Development in Education 2022 48 1 70 87 Tan, Y. S. M., & Amiel, J. J. (2022). Teachers learning to apply neuroscience to classroom instruction: case of professional development in British Columbia. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 70—87. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2019.1689522
	Tardif, E., Doudin, P. A., & Meylan, N. Neuromyths among teachers and student teachers Mind, brain, and Education 2015 9 1 50 59 Tardif, E., Doudin, P. A., & Meylan, N. (2015). Neuromyths among teachers and student teachers. Mind, brain, and Education, 9(1), 50—59.
	The Royal Society. (2011). Brain Waves Module 2: Neuroscience: implications for education and lifelong learning. The Royal Society London.
	Torres, J. F. F., & Alvarado, J. C. O Del conocimiento científico al malentendido Prevalencia de neuromitos en estudiantes ecuatorianos. Revista Iberoamericana De Educación 2018 78 1 87 106 Torres, J. F. F., & Alvarado, J. C. O. (2018). Del conocimiento científico al malentendido. Prevalencia de neuromitos en estudiantes ecuatorianos. Revista Iberoamericana De Educación, 78(1), 87—106.
	Tovazzi, A., Giovannini, S., & Basso, D. A New Method for Evaluating Knowledge, Beliefs, and Neuromyths About the Mind and Brain Among Italian Teachers Mind, Brain, and Education 2020 14 2 187 198 Tovazzi, A., Giovannini, S., & Basso, D. (2020). A New Method for Evaluating Knowledge, Beliefs, and Neuromyths About the Mind and Brain Among Italian Teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(2), 187—198.
	van Dijk, W., & Lane, H. B The brain and the US education system: Perpetuation of neuromyths Exceptionality 2020 28 1 16 29 van Dijk, W., & Lane, H. B. (2020). The brain and the US education system: Perpetuation of neuromyths. Exceptionality, 28(1), 16—29. doi: 10.1080/09362835.2018.1480954
	van Elk, M Socio-cognitive biases are associated to belief in neuromyths and cognitive enhancement: A pre-registered study Personality and Individual Differences 2019 147 28 32 van Elk, M. (2019). Socio-cognitive biases are associated to belief in neuromyths and cognitive enhancement: A pre-registered study. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 28—32. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.014
	Varas-Genestier, P., & Ferreira, R. A Neuromitos de los profesores chilenos: orígenes y predictores Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia) 2017 43 3 341 360 Varas-Genestier, P., & Ferreira, R. A. (2017). Neuromitos de los profesores chilenos: orígenes y predictores. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia), 43(3), 341—360.
	Zhang, R., Jiang, Y., Dang, B., & Zhou, A Neuromyths in Chinese Classrooms: Evidence From Headmasters in an Underdeveloped Region of China Frontiers in Education 2019 4 8 Zhang, R., Jiang, Y., Dang, B., & Zhou, A. (2019). Neuromyths in Chinese Classrooms: Evidence From Headmasters in an Underdeveloped Region of China. Frontiers in Education, 4, 8. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00008

[1]	Zhankui Wang. Cultivating “Teacher-Scholar”: Revisiting William C. Bagley’s Philosophy of Teacher Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(7): 48-57.
[2]	Xiaohong Zhu, Meng Wang. Universalization of Teacher Education: Reflection and Reconstruction [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(3): 75-88.
[3]	Baoxin Long. On the Construction of Teacher Education Discipline in the Age of Involution [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(8): 83-93.
[4]	Hualong Chen, Feifei Yin. Normal and Academic: An Exploration in the Early Stage of East China Normal University [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(10): 51-64.
[5]	Song Huan, Tian Shixu, Wu Yuchen. A Systematic Literature Review of the Empirical Research into Pre-service Teacher Education in China (2015—2019) [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(9): 78-102.
[6]	WEI Ge, CHEN Xiangming. The Emergence and Development of Research on Teacher Practical Knowledge [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2018, 36(6): 107-117+158+159.
[7]	LIU Xu-Dong. Teachers’ Knowledge：A Perspective of Divided Knowledge [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2016, 34(1): 51-56.
[8]	ZHOU Huan, YI Xinfa, HU Weiping. The confusion of student teacher and its solution ——A theoretical model of student teacher’ s “reality shock” [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2014, 32(2): 67-73.
[9]	Ma Weina yao yujia Sang Biao . Emotion Regulation Strategies and its’ Neural Mechanism:Take Cognitive Reappraisal and Expressive Suppression as example [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2010, 28(4): 50-55.