The Possibilities and Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Research

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.07.010

Abstract

Abstract:

In the new era, China is vigorously advocating for interdisciplinary research, expediting the goal of establishing world-class universities with a specific focus on dismantling traditional disciplinary barriers. The emphasis is on exploring the cultivation of exceptional, innovative talents through cross-departmental, interdisciplinary, and cross-professional approaches, expediting the integration of disciplines and proposing solutions to interdisciplinary scientific challenges, which holds significant importance. However, genuine multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary methods cannot be engendered through institutional coercion, and achieving authentic interdisciplinary studies proves challenging in current practices. Consequently, questions arise: Is interdisciplinary research imperative? How can the development of interdisciplinary studies be advanced? What opportunities and challenges exist? And what institutional pitfalls hinder interdisciplinary development? Addressing these queries, Professor Zhang Dan from East China Normal University's Institute of International and Comparative Education and Professor Susan Robertson from the Department of Education at the University of Cambridge engage in a dialogue to collectively explore the opportunities and pitfalls in the development of interdisciplinary research.

Key words: interdisciplinary studies, knowledge production, discipline development

Dan Zhang, Susan Robertson. The Possibilities and Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Research[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(7): 114-126.

Figures/Tables 1

References 0

	龚怡祖. 学科的内在建构路径与知识运行机制教育研究 2013 34 9 12 24 龚怡祖. (2013). 学科的内在建构路径与知识运行机制. 教育研究,34(9),12—24.
	张丹, 姚婷洁.. 法国交叉学科研究机构评估的制度变迁与指标体系上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 2023 31 5 100 118 张丹, 姚婷洁. (2023). 法国交叉学科研究机构评估的制度变迁与指标体系. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),31(5),100—118.
	Boix Mansilla, V., Lamont, M., & Sato, K. (2016). Shared Cognitive–Emotional–Interactional Platforms: Markers and Conditions for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaborations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(4), 571—612.
	Guntau, M., and H. Laitoko. (1991). On the Origins and Nature of Scientific Disciplines. In World Views and Scientific Discipline Formation: Science Studies in the German Democratic Republic, edited by W. R. Woodward, and R. S. Cohen, 17—28. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
	Gibbons, Michael; Nowotny, Helga; Schwartzman, Simon; Scott, Peter; Trow, Martin A. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE Publications.
	Klein, J T (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne state university press.
	König, B., K. Diehl, K. Tscherning, and K. Helming. (2013). “A Framework for Structuring Interdisciplinary Research Management. ” Research Policy. 42 (1), 261—272.
	Leydesdorff, Loet (2012). “The Knowledge-Based Economy and the Triple Helix Model”. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Communications Research. arXiv: 1—54.
	Pfrman, S., & Martin, P. (2017). Facilitating interdisciplinary scholars. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, R. dos Santos Pacheco (Eds. ), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed. ) (pp. 586—600). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
	Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the 21st Century, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
	Robertson, S. L. (2009) ‘Producing’ the Global Knowledge Economy: the World Bank, the KAM, Education and Development, in M. Simons, M. Olssen and M. Peters (eds) Re-reading Education Policies: Studying the Policy Agenda of the 21st Century, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
	Silliman, R. H. “Fresnel and the Emergence of Physics as a Discipline” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 1974 4 137 162. Silliman, R. H. (1974). “Fresnel and the Emergence of Physics as a Discipline”. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, ,4, ,137—162. doi: 10.2307/27757329
	Tomas Hellström, Erik Brattström and Leila Jabrane. (2018). Governing interdisciplinary cooperation in Centers of Excellence. Studies in Higher Education. 43(10), 1763—1777.
	Thomas Piketty. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century: a multidimensional approach to the history of capital and social classes. The British Journal of Sociology. 65(4), 736—747.
	Wallerstein, I. (1991). Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-century Paradigms, Cambridge: Polity Press.
	Whitley, R. (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[1]	Xiangjun Hao, Xue He. The Game and Integration between AI and Human in Knowledge Production and its Enlightenment to Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(9): 78-89.
[2]	Zhang Bin, Cheng Chen, Zhang Shuai, Yu Yongping. The Knowledge Production of the Empirical Research and Its Value Guidance for the Development of Preschool Education in China： Based on the Analysis of Sample Papers from 2015 to 2019 [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(9): 228-250.
[3]	Li Dong. Imaginative Pedagogical Theory in the Era of Information Technology: A Perspective of Knowledge Production and Theory Reconstruction [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2019, 37(4): 13-24.
[4]	Cui Yanqiang, Quan Peipei. The Modernity of University Discipline and Its Transcendence [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2019, 37(2): 73-80.